Agricultural Economics and Development

Agricultural Economics and Development

Water Resources Management in Qarehsou River Basin of Golestan Province under Drought Condition and Environmental Protection: A Cooperative Game Theory Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
F. Mazraeh 1
H. Amirnejad 2
A. Nikouei 3
1 PhD Student in Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
2 Associate Professor in Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
3 Corresponding Author and Faculty Member of Scientific Board Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization
10.30490/aead.2022.356039.1381
Abstract
Given the climate change and the need to protect the environment, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, it is necessary to adopt a new mechanism for the equitable allocation of scarce water resources and the resulting benefits among stakeholders. This study used a Cooperative Game Theory (CGT) framework in order to analyze water management under water scarcity and drought conditions in Qarehsou River Basin of Golestan province of Iran. The required data were collected through a survey research and completing the questionnaires in the cropping year of 2017-2018. Loehman stability index was used to investigate the willingness of stakeholders to participate in coalition and the determination of stability. The results showed achieving full cooperation would increase the total benefit of basin. The study of the stability index showed that in general, the grand coalition based on Nash-Harsanyi was more stable than the Shapley value and Nucleolus in drought scenarios. As a result, the cooperation between stakeholders should be increased in the form of basin coordination councils to protect the ecosystem and preserve the economic interests of basin in conditions of water scarcity. The CGT solutions and power index examined demonstrate the importance of combining the strategic behavior of stakeholders in designing acceptable and sustainable policies to reduce the effects of drought in the basin. Therefore, it is recommended to apply Nash-Harsanyi solution to redistribute the benefits of cooperation between stakeholders in the basin; in other words, the distribution of cooperative benefits between stakeholders is based on relative weights, which is calculated based on the maximum demand of water users in the non-cooperative model within a cooperative theory.
Keywords
Cooperative Game Theory (CGT)
Qarehsou River Basin
Drought
Water Resources Management

Subjects

  1. Akbari, M. (2020). Partnership of contractors in cooperative game theory approach to project resource management. Scientia Iranica (International Journal of Science and Technology), 27(1): 469-480.
  2. Alcamo, J., Henrichs, T. and Rosch, T. (2000). World water in 2025: Global modeling and scenario analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century. Report A0002. Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Germany. Available at http://www.env-edu.gr/Documents/World%20Water%20in%202025.pdf.
  3. Amirnejad, H., Rafiee, H. and Atghaee, M. (2010). Estimation of the preservation value of environmental resources (case study: Miankaleh international wetland). Journal of Envirenmental Studies, 36(53): 89-98. (Persian)
  4. Booker, F., Howitt, R.E., Michelsen, A.M. and Young, R.A. (2012). Economics and the modeling of water resources and policies. Natural Resource Modeling, 25(1): 168-218.
  5. Boretti, A. and Rosa, L. (2019). Reassessing the projections of the world water development report. NPJ Clean Water, 2(1): 1-6.
  6. Brouwer, R. and Hofkes, M. (2008). Integrated hydro-economic modelling: approaches, key issues and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 66(1): 16-22.
  7. De Laporte, A. (2007). Tradeoffs between agricultural interests and wetland ecological benefits int he Eramosa watershed. University of Guelph.
  8. Degefu, D.M., He, W., Yuan, L., Min, A. and Zhang, Q. (2018). Bankruptcy to surplus: sharing transboundary river basin’s water under scarcity. Water Resources Management, 32(8): 2735-2751.
  9. Dinar, A., Farolfi, S., Patrone, F. and Rowntree, K. (2008). To negotiate or to game theorize: evaluating water allocation mechanisms in the Kat Basin, South Africa. In: Game theory and policy making in natural resources and the environment (pp. 105-131), Routledge.
  10. Do, P., Tian, F., Zhu, T., Zohidov, B., Ni, G., Lu, H. and Liu, H. (2020). Exploring synergies in the water-food-energy nexus by using an integrated hydro-economic optimization model for the Lancang-Mekong River Basin. Science of The Total Environment, 728: 137996.
  11. Ghorbani, K., Meftah Halaghi, M., Keramatzadeh, A. and Salarijazi, M. (2020). Application of game theory to determining optimal harvesting of water resources (case study: Gharesu basin). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 27(5): 69-87. (Persian)
  12. Harsanyi, J.C. (1959). A bargaining model for the cooperative n-person game. Stanford University.
  13. Howitt, R., Medellin-Azuara, J., Lund, J. and MacEwan, D. (2014). Preliminary 2014 drought economic impact estimates in Central Valley agriculture. Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California Davis. Davis, California. Available at https://watershed.ucdavis.edu/files/biblio/Preliminary_2014_drought_economic_impacts-05192014. pdf. Retrieved ar 10 July, 2014.
  14. Jahani, S., Hesam, M. and Mosaedi, A. (2009). Servaying drought process by rainfall fluctuation of Gorgan. Paper Presented at the First International Conference on Water Crisis, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran. (Persian)
  15. Kahil, M.T., Albic, J., Dinar, A., Calvo, E., Esteban, E., Avella, L. and Garcia-Molla, M. (2016). Improving the performance of water policies: evidence from drought in Spain. Water, 8(2): 34.
  16. Kankash Omran Engineers Company of Gorgan. (2016). Water resource balance of the study areas of the Qarehsou-Gorgan river basin. Rigenal Water Company of Golestan Province.
  17. Kirby, M., Bark, R., Connor, J., Qureshi, M.E. and Keyworth, S. (2014). Sustainable irrigation: How did irrigated agriculture in Australia's Murray–Darling Basin adapt in the Millennium Drought? Agricultural Water Management, 145: 154-162.
  18. Loehman, E., Orlando, J., Tschirhart, J. and Whinston, A. (1979). Cost allocation for a regional wastewater treatment system. Water Resources Research, 15(2): 193-202.
  19. Mallawaarachchi, T., Blamey, R., Morrison, M., Johnson, A. and Bennett, J. (2001). Community values for environmental protection in a cane farming catchment in Northern Australia: a choice modelling study. Journal of Environmental Management, 62(3): 301-316.
  20. Meftah Halaghi, M., Farzaneh, F., Dehghani, A. and Ghorbani, K. (2018). Evaluation of aquifer performance affected by different climate scenarios (case study: Qaraosso basin). Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 12(5): 1140-1153. (Persian)
  21. Middleton, B.A. (2012). Global change and the function and distribution of wetlands (Vol. 1). Springer Science and Business Media.
  22. Mirkarimi, s., Amirnejad, H. and Joolaie, R. (2020). Integration of core and uncertainty bankruptcy methods for optimal allocation of Gorganrod-Gharahso basin. Agricultural Economics, 13(4): 105-126. DOI: 10.22034/iaes.2020.118653.1745. (Persian)
  23. Mosaedi, A., Khalilizadeh, M. and Mohammadi, A. (2008). Drought monitoring in Golestan provinc. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 15(2): 176-182. (Persian)
  24. Nikouei, A., Zibaei, M. and Ward, F.A. (2012). Incentives to adopt irrigation water saving measures for wetlands preservation: an integrated basin scale analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 464: 216-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.013.
  25. Noori, M., Emadi, A. and Fazloula, R. (2021). An agent-based model for water allocation optimization and comparison with the game theory approach. Water Supply, 21(7): 3584-3601.
  26. Poursepahy Samian, H. and Kerachian, R. (2011). Water allocation in common rivers: application of game theory. Paper Presented at the 6th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Semnan. (Persian)
  27. Qureshi, M.E., Ranjan, R. and Qureshi, S.E. (2010). An empirical assessment of the value of irrigation water: the case study of Murrumbidgee catchment. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(1): 99-118.
  28. Ringler, C. and Cai, X. (2006). Valuing fisheries and wetlands using integrated economic-hydrologic modeling — Mekong River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132(6): 480-487.
  29. Royan Consulting Engineers Company of Golestan. (2018). Studies of the detailed phase of the Miankale Biosphere Reserve Management Plan of Mazandaran Province, 16: 1-175. (Persian)
  30. Salehi, , Daneshvar, M., Shahnoushi, N. and Jaleh Rajabi, M. (2010). Application of game theory in determination of optimal groundwater extraction in Taybad Plain. Agricultural Economics, 4(3): 65-89. (Persian)
  31. Schmeidler, D. (1969). The Nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17(6): 1163-1170.
  32. Swathi, N. (2020). Water resource conflicts: a game theory approach. Malaya Journal of Matematik, S(2): 1416-1420.
  33. Taghavi Kaljahi, S., Reiazi, B. and Taghavi, L. (2014). Determination of environmental water requirement of Miankaleh wetland. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(2): 101-109. (Persian)
  34. Teasley, R.L. (2009). Evaluating water resource management in transboundary river basins using cooperative game theory: the Rio Grande/Bravo basin: The University of Texas at Austin.
  35. (2018). Why Are Wetlands Important? Available at: https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/why-are-wetlands-important
  36. Winter, E. (2002). The Shapley value. Chapter 53 in: Handbook of game theory with economic applications, Vol. 3, pp. 2025-2054.
  37. Winter, T.C. (2000). The vulnerability of wetlands to climate change: a hydrologic landscape perspective. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 36(2): 305-311.
  38. WWF (2020). Living Planet Report 2020 - Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten M. and Petersen, T. (Eds). World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Gland, Switzerland. Available at https://www.zsl.org/sites/default/files/LPR%202020%20Full%20report.pdf.
  39. Ziaei, M, Keykha, A.A., Eshraghi, F., Ahmadpour, M., Ziaei, S., Mohammadi, H. (2022). Exploring the effect of environmental indicators on agricultural sustainability in Golestan province, Journal of Natural Environment, 74(2), 304-316. (Persian)
  40. Zilberman, D., Dinar, A., MacDougall, N., Khanna, M., Brown, C. and Castillo, F. (1998). Private and institutional adaptation to water scarcity during the California drought, 1987-1992. Staff Paper No. 9802. Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.