Agricultural Economics and Development

Agricultural Economics and Development

Determining Optimal Cropping Pattern to Enhance Poverty Alleviation Index, Strengthen Food Security, and Conserve Water Resources

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Madineh Salamat 1
Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi 2
Masoumeh Forouzani 3
hassan azarm 4
1 MSc. Graduate in Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.
10.30490/aead.2025.367421.1668
Abstract
Introduction: Poverty is recognized as one of the main human problems, especially in developing countries. Eradicating poverty in all its forms and everywhere by 2030 is the first goal among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations. Therefore, one of the goals of agriculture is to reduce poverty, especially in developing countries. In addition to poverty, food insecurity has also become a global problem in rural areas over recent decades. Given the importance of the agricultural sector in the economy of developing countries, it is crucial to maintain agriculture as a source of income and to produce and supply the required food. Emphasis should be placed on the resources available to farmers and the factors affecting decision-making in resource allocation. Increasing agricultural production necessitates enhancing the productivity of scarce resources. The strong relationship between poverty and income links the issues of poverty and the optimal use of agricultural production factors. Official statistics show that poverty in Iran has increased in recent years. Therefore, this study aimed mainly at providing a Multi-objective Mathematical Programming (MMP) model to improve the poverty index in line with sustainable development and food security of the lands downstream of the irrigation and drainage networks of the Karun-e-Bozorg (Great Karun).
Materials and Methods: This study aimed to develop a mathematical programming model to improve the FGT poverty index and address objectives related to food security and water resource sustainability. The multi-objective mathematical programming method was used. Before explaining the proposed model, the FGT poverty index was reviewed and introduced. This index measures the distributional and income effects on poverty and indicates that poverty rates from different population subgroups can be aggregated to achieve a single poverty rate for the entire population. So, different objectives could be considered depending on the agricultural and livelihood situation in the lands under irrigation networks, including: 1) to minimize the FGT poverty index, 2) to maximize energy production from food consumption (food security), and 3) to minimize irrigation water consumption (environmental). Multi-objective programming methods require harmonizing the measurement criteria in different objectives. A multi-objective fuzzy nonlinear programming model derived from Jones & Barnes (2000) was used to harmonize the objectives. The required data was collected through interviews with experts from the Agriculture-Jahad Center of Ahwaz County of Iran in 2024 and from the Statistical Center of Iran (SCI). The areas studied included North East Ahvaz, Gotvand, Miyan-Ab, East Shoaybiyeh, which had different crops and horticultural crops depending on the climate and soil. The solution of the proposed models was carried out using GAMS software and the CONOPT algorithm, which uses the generalized simplex method to solve linear and nonlinear problems.
Results and Discussion: The study results showed that the poverty index minimization goal had the greatest impact on changing the optimal crop area of the study areas compared to current conditions. The irrigation water minimization scenario had the least contribution in this regard. The amount of water consumed in the multi-objective model was greater in winter and less in summer compared to the current conditions. Considering the triple objectives, the profits of all studied regions would increase compared to the current conditions. The highest profit growth would be related to the Gotvand region, and the lowest to the East Shoaybiyeh region. Under the goal of minimizing irrigation water, the poverty index for the four regions would not change. Considering other goals, the poverty index would decrease compared to the current conditions. By applying optimal conditions in the form of a multi-objective model, the poverty index in the Miyan-Ab region would decrease by 51 percent. Under the objective of minimizing irrigation water consumption, the amount of calorie intake resulting from crop production would not change compared to the current conditions. However, under multi-objective conditions, considering the objective of maximizing calorie production, the volume of calories produced would exceed 57 million calories. The data showed that the total calorie intake would increase by 39 percent under the optimal conditions compared to the current conditions.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The study findings indicated that the allocation of agricultural inputs in the studied areas was not optimal and the current cultivated area was very different from the optimal values. Under the optimal conditions, the cultivated area of beans, cucumbers, alfalfa, and rice in all four studied regions will decrease compared to the current conditions. However, the cultivated area of corn and wheat for all regions will increase under the optimal conditions. This study confirms that the optimal use of agricultural production resources will lead to increased profits, improved poverty, reduced water consumption, and increased calorie intake in the four regions. The proposed mathematical programming model will contribute to achieving sustainable development and improving food security. Encouraging farmers to adopt an optimal cropping pattern requires a combination of support policies and economic incentives. It is recommended to provide financial and credit facilities to farmers to purchase agricultural inputs and equipment needed to implement the optimal cropping pattern, hold training and extension courses for farmers on the benefits of the cropping pattern and optimal cultivation methods, and guarantee the purchase of farmers’ products at reasonable prices to create strong incentives for adopting the cropping pattern.
Keywords
Cropping Pattern
Poverty Index
Produced Calories
Multi-Objective Fuzzy Non-Linear Programming (MOFNLP)

Subjects

1.      Ahmadi, A., Badsar, M., Karami, R., Gholizadeh, H., Mohammadi Nasrabadi, F. (2023). Evaluating the effects of sustainable food system drivers on food insecurity in rural households of West Azerbaijan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 54-2(3), 643-661. DOI: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2023.347212.669169. [In Persian]  
2.      Arifullah, S. A., Yasmaeen, G., Zulfiqar, M., & Chishti, A. F. (2008). Food consumption, calorie intake and poverty status: a case study of north west frontier province. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 24(3), 505-509. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348993107.
3.      Berenger, V., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: standard of living quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(12), 59-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.011.
4.      Chiappero, M. E. (1996). Standard of living evaluation based on Sen’s approach: some methodological suggestions. Notizie di Politeia, 12, 37-53.
5.      Dehghanizadeh, M., Bakhtiari, S., & Daeikarimzadeh, S. (2021). Simultaneous fulfillment of the agricultural sector economic goals, affected by limited water resources in the framework of the Iran’s Sixth Development Plan: a case study of Yazd province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 52(2), 275-285. DOI: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2020.299556.668890. [In Persian] 
6.      Eyasu, A. M. (2020). Determinants of poverty in rural households: evidence from North-Western Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1), 1823652. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2020.1823652. 
7.      Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761-766. DOI: 10.2307/1913475.
8.      Hosseini Yekani, S. A., & Keshiri Kalaei, F. (2016). Investigating the effect of agricultural product price fluctuations on the optimal pattern of crop production in Sari city. Agricultural Economics, 11(2), 75-95. DOI: 10.22034/IAES.2017.24330. [In Persian]
9.      Jain, S., Ramesh, D., & Bhattacharya, D. (2021). A multi-objective algorithm for crop pattern optimization in agriculture. Applied Soft Computing, 112, 107772. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107772.
10.   Jones, D., & Barnes, E. M. (2000). Fuzzy composite programming to combine remote sensing and crop models for decision support in precision crop management. Agricultural Systems, 56, 137-158. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00026-3.
11.   Kavand, H., Ziaee, S., & Mardani Najafabadi, M. (2023). The impact of water conservation policies on the reallocation of agricultural water-land resources. Frontiers in Water, 5, 1138869. DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2023.1138869.
12.   KGPD (2016). Economic, social and cultural report of Khuzestan province in the Iran’s Fourth Development Plan of 2015-2019: storage location. Khuzestan Governorate Planning Deputy (KGPD) Library, Ahvaz. [In Persian]
13.   Laskookalayeh, S. S., Mardani Najafabadi, M., & Shahnazari, A. (2022). Investigating the effects of management of irrigation water distribution on farmers’ gross profit under uncertainty: a new positive mathematical programming model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131277. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131277.
14.   Leal Filho, W., Lovren, V. O., Will, M., Salvia, A. L., & Frankenberger, F. (2021). Poverty: a central barrier to the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science & Policy, 125, 96-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.020.
15.   Lu, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Xu, C., & Cheng, B. (2021). Can health poverty alleviation project reduce the economic vulnerability of poor households? Evidence from Chifeng City, China. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 162, 107762. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107762.
16.   Mahmoodi, A., Aminpour, D., Yavari, G., Ejlali, F., & Nikookar, A. (2025). Optimal cropping pattern considering uncertainty and using linear and fuzzy goal programming models (case study: Saqqez County). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 55(4), 667-682. DOI: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2025.385654.669330. [In Persian]
17.   MAJ (2023). Statistics and publications: Agricultural statistics - Crops 2022-2023 (Vol. 1). Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), Tehran. Available at https://get.agrodl.ir/statistics/field-crops/401-402.pdf. [In Persian]
18.   Mardani Najafabadi, M., Abdshahi, A., Forouzani, M., & Zainali, M. (2019a). Investigating the effects of the quality of water and soil resources on the efficiency of irrigation and drainage networks of Karun Bohor under conditions of uncertainty. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 13(3), 737-749. [In Persian]
19.   Mardani Najafabadi, M., Mirzaei, A., Azarm, H., & Nikmehr, S. (2022). Managing water supply and demand to achieve economic and environmental objectives: application of mathematical programming and ANFIS models. Water Resources Management, 36(9), 3007-3027. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03178-1.
20.   Mardani Najafabadi, M., Ziaee, S., Nikouei, A., & Borazjani, M. A. (2019b). Mathematical Programming Model (MMP) for optimization of regional cropping patterns decisions: a case study. Agricultural Systems, 173, 218-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.006.
21.   Marzban, Z., Asgharipour, M. R., Ghanbari, A., Ramroudi, M., & Seyedabadi, E. (2022). Determining cropping patterns with emphasis on optimal energy consumption using LCA and multi-objective planning: a case study in eastern Lorestan province, Iran. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 7(5), 489-507. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-021-00211-8. 
22.   Maulu, S., Hasimuna, O. J., Mutale, B., Mphande, J., & Siankwilimba, E. (2021). Enhancing the role of rural agricultural extension programs in poverty alleviation: a review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 7(1), 1886663. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2021.1886663.
23.   Mirzaei, A., Abdeshahi, A., Azarm, H., & Naghavi, S. (2022b). New design of water-energy-food-environment nexus for sustainable agricultural management. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(7), 1861-1874. DOI: 10.1007/s00477-021-02131-9.
24.   Mirzaei, A., Azarm, H., & Naghavi, S. (2022a). Optimization of cropping pattern under seasonal fluctuations of surface water using multistage stochastic programming. Water Supply, 22(6), 5716-5728. DOI: 10.2166/ws.2022.224.
25.   Namara, R. E., Hanjra, M. A., Castillo, G. E., Ravnborg, H. M., Smith, L., & Van Koppen, B. (2010). Agricultural water management and poverty linkages. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 520-527. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.05.007.
26.   Okoko, A. N. (2022). Becoming flood insecure: lessons from village level experiences in Tana Delta, Kenya. Progress in Disaster Science, 16, 100265. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100265.
27.   Omodero, C. O. (2021). Sustainable agriculture, food production and poverty lessening in Nigeria. Transport, 3(6). DOI: 10.18280/ijsdp.160108.
28.   Osowole, O. I., & Bamiduro, A. T. (2013). On the derivation of estimators of Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) poverty indices. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 1-13. Available at https://dc.cbn.gov.ng/jas/vol4/iss1/1.
29.   Pakravan-Charvadeh, M .R., Hosseini, S. S., & Noori Naeini, S. (2020). Determining socio-economic factors associated with household food security in rural and urban areas in Khuzestan province. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 25(83), 113-136. DOI: 10.22054/ijer.2020.46842.794. [In Persian]
30.   Pawlak, K., & Kołodziejczak, M. (2020). The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sustainability, 12(13), 5488. DOI: 10.3390/su12135488.
31.   Rezaeifar, M., Khalilian, S., & Najafi Alamdarloo, H. (2022). Spatial distribution of food insecurity in urban and rural areas of Iran. Journal of Agriculture Economics, 16(1), 99-121. DOI: 10.22034/IAES.2022.540824.1881. [In Persian]
32.   Savari, M., & Sookhtanlou, M. (2019). Studying the Villagers Semantic Perception of the Food Security Concept. Journal of Community Development (Rural and Urban), 11(20), 239-266. DOI: 10.22059/JRD.2019.74468. [In Persian]
33.   Sayban, F., Abdeshahi, A., & Mardani Najafabadi, M. (2020). Designing a mathematical programming model to optimize the FGT poverty index in rural areas of Behbahan. Journal of Rural Research, 11(3), 538-555. DOI: 10.22059/JRUR.2020.286858.1412. [In Persian]
34.   SCI (2024). Poverty index in 2023. Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), Tehran. Available at https://www.amar.org.ir. [In Persian]
35.   See, L., Fritz, S., You, L., Ramankutty, N., Herrero, M., Justice, C., ... & Obersteiner, M. (2015). Improved global cropland data as an essential ingredient for food security. Global Food Security, 4, 37-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.10.004.
36.   Singh, P. K., & Chudasama, H. (2020). Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country. PloS One, 15(1), e0227176. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227176.
37.   World Bank (2024). Data 360; World development indicators: countries and economies. Available at https://data.worldbank.org.