Agricultural Economics and Development

Agricultural Economics and Development

Designing an Innovative Digital Agricultural Education Model to Improve Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in Rural Areas of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran University of Applied Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Over recent decades, digital agriculture has emerged as a key tool for enhancing productivity and sustainability in rural areas. This concept involves the use of technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), remote sensing, and machine learning to optimize resource consumption, increase productivity, and manage environmental sustainability. However, rural farmers face challenges in adopting these technologies due to infrastructure and information limitations. Digital agricultural education can play a significant role in empowering farmers and increasing their awareness of modern technologies. In this context, designing an innovative educational model that addresses the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of agriculture is essential. To be effective, such a model must incorporate accessible training methods, local language support, and real-time advisory services tailored to the specific needs of rural communities. It should also consider gender inclusivity, digital literacy, and community engagement to ensure widespread adoption. This research aimed at proposing an effective model for digital agricultural education to contribute to the sustainable productivity of agriculture in rural areas and improve the living standard of farmers. Furthermore, the study highlighted the importance of public-private partnerships and government support in scaling digital initiatives and bridging the digital gap in underserved farming regions.
Materials and Methods: This study utilized a mixed research method with an exploratory sequential approach to design an innovative digital agricultural education model focusing on social, economic, and environmental impacts. In the qualitative phase, the required data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 managers from the Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ) as well as agricultural education specialists and university professors. Data analysis was carried out in five stages: generating initial codes, searching for selective codes, forming sub-themes, and defining main themes. In total, 50 selective codes, 26 sub-themes, and 9 main themes/categories were identified. The validity of the findings was confirmed by interviewees, and their reliability was tested through retesting and comparing coding between two researchers. In the quantitative phase, the required data were collected through a questionnaire designed based on the results of the qualitative phase from a sample population consisting of agricultural education specialists, staff, and university professors. A cluster sampling method was used, and the sample size was determined to be 1960 people. The reliability of the questionnaires was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling to examine the relationships among the identified variables. The final model provided insights into the key drivers of effective digital agricultural education and could serve as a foundation for policy-making and curriculum development. The findings contributed to a better understanding of the factors affecting digital agricultural education and provided an innovative educational model that could be adapted to various rural contexts.
Results and Discussion: The study results showed that the innovative digital agricultural education model had a significant impact on improving productivity and sustainability in rural agriculture. In the qualitative phase, thematic analysis led to the identification of 9 main themes, including social sustainability, economic sustainability, environmental sustainability, digital innovations, education and empowerment, policy-making, technological infrastructure, synergies and partnerships, and research and development. In the quantitative phase, path coefficients showed that all independent variables had significantly positive impacts on the digital agricultural education model (P<0.05). The highest impacts were related to the education and empowerment (β=0.813) and the policy-making and strategy (β=0.817). The R² value (0.585) and the overall model fit index (GOF=0.412) indicated a strong match between the model and the empirical data. In addition, the predictive relevance (Q²) confirmed the model’s predictive accuracy. The findings underscore the importance of educational, technological, and policy factors in the development of digital agriculture and emphasize the role of synergy between government, universities, and the private sector. These results can serve as a foundation for policy strategies and the design of digital educational programs in the field of sustainable agriculture.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The study findings indicated that the innovative digital agricultural education model, focusing on social, economic and environmental impacts, could be an effective solution for improving productivity and sustainability in the rural agriculture. The identification of the above-mentioned nine key themes/dimensions showed that combining these factors could facilitate the successful adoption and implementation of digital agricultural education. The findings also emphasized that technological infrastructure, supportive policies, and the development of farmers’ digital skills would be essential components of this model. Furthermore, the role of digital innovations such as IoT and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in optimizing agricultural processes and enhancing productivity was confirmed. The consistency of this study’s findings with previous research highlights the importance of policy strategies, technology development, and digital education in fostering sustainable agriculture. Therefore, it is recommended that policymakers and planners, considering these dimensions, develop comprehensive strategies for the expansion of digital agricultural education, which will contribute to increased agricultural productivity, the preservation of natural resources, and sustainable development
Keywords

  • Afzali Gorouh, A., Hosseyni, S. M., Rezaei, A., & Alambeigi, A. (2021). Identifying the components of the sustainable agricultural higher education system. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, (Articles in Press). DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.294088.668856. [In Persian]
  • Ayre, M., Mc Collum, V., Waters, W., Samson, P., Curro, A., Nettle, R., ... & Reichelt, N. (2019). Supporting and practicing digital innovation with advisers in smart farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100302.
  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022). A starting point for your journey, not a map: Nikki Hayfield in Conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 424-445.‏
  • Cheraghi, T., Eshraghi, R., Poursaeed, A., Vahedi, M., & Arayesh, M. B. (2020). The impact of medicinal plant production training workshops on employment and livelihood sustainability of Ilam nomadic extension assistants. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 12(54), 53-66. DOI: 10.22092/jaear.2021.352568.1775. [In Persian]
  • Clapp, J., & Ruder, S. L. (2020). Precision technologies for agriculture: digital farming, gene-edited crops, and the politics of sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 20(3), 49-69.
  • Elahi, E., Khalid, Z., Weijun, C., & Zhang, H. (2020). The public policy of agricultural land allotment to agrarians and its impact on crop productivity in Punjab province of Pakistan. Land Use Policy, 90, 104324.
  • Fabregas, R., Kremer, M., & Schilbach, F. (2019). Realizing the potential of digital development: the case of agricultural advice. Science, 366(6471), eaay3038.
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Oualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
  • Finger, R., Swinton, S. M., El Benni, N., & Walter, A. (2019). Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11(1), 313-335.
  • Fleming, A., Jakku, E., Fielke, S., Taylor, B. M., Lacey, J., Terhorst, A., & Stitzlein, C. (2021). Foresighting Australian digital agricultural futures: applying responsible innovation thinking to anticipate research and development impact under different scenarios. Agricultural Systems, 190, 103120.
  • Fuentes-Peñailillo, F., Gutter, K., Vega, R., & Silva, G. C. (2024). Transformative technologies in digital agriculture: leveraging Internet of Things, Remote Sensing, and Artificial Intelligence for smart crop management. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 13(4), 39.
  • Haddadi, S., Mojarradi, G., Hosseini, S. M., & Ghasemi, J. (2024). Designing a representation model for the new agricultural extension system of Iran: the use of grounded theory. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 55(4), 699-718. DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2025.377959.669308. [In Persian]
  • Haggag, W. M. (2021). Agricultural digitalization and rural development in COVID-19 response plans: a review Article. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 17(1), 67-74.
  • Hrustek, L. (2020). Sustainability driven by agriculture through digital transformation. Sustainability, 12(20), 8596.
  • Huang, Ch., Wang, Y., Wu, T., & Wang, P. (2013). An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the Moodle platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217-221.
  • Karpisheh, L., & Aliyari, M. (2024). Green agriculture development: a strategy for economic, social and environmental sustainability in rural areas. Geography and Human Relationships, 7(3), 355-372. DOI: 10.22034/gahr.2025.500393.2368. [In Persian]
  • Kazemi, F., Rezaei, A., Hejazi, Y., & Alembeigi, A. (2023). Examining the challenges of integrating sustainability in higher education of agriculture and natural resources in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, (Articles in Press). DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2023.357522.669209. [In Persian]
  • Khorami, Sh., Rahali, H., & Bayzid, D. (2020). Identifying and categorizing factors affecting the growth of e-commerce for agricultural products with an emphasis on agricultural sustainability. Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 30(3), 253-266. [In Persian]
  • Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and Agriculture 4.0: new contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100315.
  • Montes de Oca Munguia, O., Pannell, D. J., & Llewellyn, R. (2021). Understanding the adoption of innovations in agriculture: a review of selected conceptual models. Agronomy, 11(1), 139. DOI: 3390/agronomy11010139.
  • Nasirahmadi, A., & Hensel, O. (2022). Toward the next generation of digitalization in agriculture based on digital twin paradigm. Sensors, 22(2), 498.
  • Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., & Turner, J. A. (2019). Digitalisation in the New Zealand agricultural knowledge and innovation system: initial understandings and emerging organisational responses to digital agriculture. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100313.
  • Safi Sis, Y., Joodi Damirchi, M., & Maleki, M. (2021). The effect of agricultural extension and education system on farmers’ environmental behavior. Rural Development Strategies, 7(4), 381-396. DOI: 10.22048/rdsj.2020.242509.1864. [In Persian]
  • Shaeri, M., & Rezghi Shirsavar, H. (2021). Providing a model of sustainable development based on the excellence of entrepreneurship education of agriculture-Jahad training centers. Geography (Regional Planning), 11(42), 553-572. DOR: 1001.1.22286462.1400.11.2.29.9. [In Persian]
  • Sharifi, O., & Mahdizadeh Rayeni, M. J. (2024). Investigating the role of education in the application of precision agriculture and its components on sustainable agricultural development with an emphasis on water resource sustainability in southern Kerman. Environmental Science Studies, 9(4), 9702-9718. DOI: 10.22034/jess.2024.455508.2249. [In Persian]
  • Sharma, R., Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Kumar, V., & Kumar, A. (2020). A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Computers & Operations Research, 119, 104926.
  • Shepherd, M., Turner, J. A., Small, B., & Wheeler, D. (2020). Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the ‘digital agriculture’ revolution. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(14), 5083-5092.
  • Steinke, J., Ortiz-Crespo, B., van Etten, J., & Müller, A. (2022). Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: insights from practice. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103313.
  • Weersink, A., Fraser, E., Pannell, D., Duncan, E., & Rotz, S. (2018). Opportunities and challenges for big data in agricultural and environmental analysis. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10(1), 19-37.