Agricultural Economics and Development

Agricultural Economics and Development

The Role of Human Development, Fossil and Renewable Energy Consumption, and Climate Change in Iran’s Food Security

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
alireza sargazi 1
hasti parsamonfared 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 Master's student in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
10.30490/aead.2025.367320.1642
Abstract
Introduction: Ensuring food security— both in terms of quantity and quality—remains a strategic priority for most nations, particularly developing countries facing multifaceted environmental and socio-economic challenges. Iran, characterized by its growing population, urbanization, limited water resources, and vulnerability to climate change, is no exception. These issues, coupled with sanctions and resource mismanagement, have intensified the urgency for policy interventions to sustain and enhance food production systems. This study aimed at investigating the intricate and nonlinear relationship between food security and several influential factors including Human Development Index (HDI), energy consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources, carbon dioxide emissions (as a proxy for climate change), and labor force participation in the agricultural sector. Understanding the asymmetrical impact of these factors over time is essential for formulating robust policies that ensure sustainable food access and resilience against future shocks.
Materials and Methods: This research used annual time-series data from 1990 to 2022 to analyze the dynamic relationships between food security and its potential determinants in Iran. The dependent variable was Food Production Index (FPI), which serves as a proxy for food security. The independent variables included: HDI (Human Development Index), reflecting education, health, and income dimensions; LENE (Log of Non-Renewable Energy Consumption), measured by energy used in the agricultural sector; RNE (Renewable Energy Consumption), expressed as a percentage of total energy consumption; LCO2 (Log of CO₂ Emissions), as a measure of environmental degradation and climate change; and LLAB (Log of Labor in Agriculture), representing workforce capacity in food production. All data were obtained from credible sources such as the World Bank, UNDP, FAO, and OECD. The variables were logarithmically transformed for normalization and to allow for elasticity interpretation. Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model was employed as the econometric methodology. This approach enables the differentiation between the effects of positive and negative shocks (asymmetries) in the explanatory variables on food security, both in the short and long runs. Unit root tests (ADF and PP), BDS nonlinearity tests, bounds testing for cointegration, and diagnostic checks (CUSUM, CUSUMSQ) were applied to ensure the robustness and stability of the model.
Results and Discussion: The estimation results highlighted the asymmetric effects of various socio-economic and environmental factors on the food security in Iran. A positive shock in HDI would improve the food security by 3.09 percent, underscoring the importance of education and healthcare in enhancing agricultural productivity. Conversely, a negative HDI shock would cause a sharp 17.06 percent decline, revealing significant vulnerability to social setbacks. In addition, negative shocks in non-renewable energy consumption (LENE) would reduce the food security by 0.34 percent, emphasizing the role of energy access in agriculture, while positive shocks would be statistically insignificant due to potential environmental trade-offs. Similarly, the negative shocks in renewable energy consumption (RNE) would reduce the food security by 0.3 percent, pointing to the sector’s dependency on stable renewable inputs, whereas the positive shocks would remain insignificant, reflecting the underdeveloped role of renewables in agriculture. Interestingly, both the positive and negative shocks in CO₂ emissions would slightly improve the food security (by 0.21 and 0.39 percent, respectively), possibly due to short-term fertilization effects, despite long-term ecological concerns. In terms of labor, the positive shocks would increase the food security by 0.89 percent, and the negative shocks would reduce it by 0.78 percent, reaffirming the labor-intensive nature of Iranian agriculture. Granger causality tests further confirmed a bidirectional relationship between CO₂ emissions and the food security, unidirectional causality from HDI, RNE, and LENE to the food security, and reverse causality from the food security to the labor. These results underlined the complex and asymmetric dynamics shaping the food security, influenced by socio-economic development, energy use, and environmental pressures.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The study concluded that improving human development indicators, expanding the share of renewable energy in agriculture, and maintaining a stable agricultural workforce were vital for enhancing the food security in Iran. The positive effects of CO₂ emissions, while notable in the short term, should not distract policymakers from the long-term risks of climate change. To mitigate vulnerabilities and build resilience, several policy recommendations are made as follows:
·         Enhancing education, healthcare, and income equity to improve HDI;
·         Reducing dependence on fossil fuels and investing in renewable energy technologies for agricultural use;
·         Developing adaptive agricultural systems resilient to climate variability; and
·         Supporting rural employment programs and reversing urban migration by improving rural livelihoods.
Given Iran’s geopolitical challenges and environmental limitations, these strategies must be pursued through coordinated government planning and international cooperation.
Keywords
Food Security
Econometrics
Clean Energies
Development
Climate Change.

Subjects

1.      Anooshehpour, A., Moghaddasi, R., Mohammadinejad, A., & Yazdani, S. (2020). The relationship between energy consumption and total factor productivity in agriculture: application of Quantile Regression Approach. Iranian Energy Economics, 9(34), 65-85. DOI: 10.22054/jiee.2021.56060.1789. [In Persian]
2.      Arora, N. K. (2019). Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environmental Sustainability, 2(2), 95-96.‏ DOI: 10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w.
3.      Affoh, R., Zheng, H., Dangui, K., & Dissani, B. M. (2022). The impact of climate variability and change on food security in sub-saharan Africa: perspective from panel data analysis. Sustainability, 14(2), 759. DOI: 10.3390/su14020759.‏
4.      Alhudhori, M. (2017). Pengaruh IPM, PDRB dan jumlah pengangguran terhadap penduduk miskin di Provinsi Jambi. Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business, 1(1), 113-124. [In Indonesian]‏
5.      Apriliana, T., & Wahyuningsih, N. D. (2019). The application of TSLS (Two Stage Least Square) in simulant equation among food security, human development index, and poverty in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 11(03-Special Issue), 535-540.‏
6.      Asfew, M., Mitiku, F., Gemechu, A., Bekele, Y., & Lemma, T. (2023). Do climate change and political instability affect crop production in sub-Saharan Africa countries? Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 12, 100576.‏
7.      Ayyildiz, M., & Erdal, G. (2021). The relationship between carbon dioxide emission and crop and livestock production indexes: a dynamic common correlated effects approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 597-610.‏
8.      Azam, A., Shafique, M., Rafiq, M., & Ateeq, M. (2023). Moving toward sustainable agriculture: the nexus between clean energy, ICT, human capital and environmental degradation under SDG policies in European countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 50, 101252. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101252.‏
9.      Behera, U. K., & Sahoo, P. K. (2022). Energy use in conservation agriculture. In: Conservation Agriculture in India, 199-220. DOI: 10.4324/9781003292487-12.‏
10.   Bergougui, B., & Aldawsari, M. I. (2024). Asymmetric impact of patents on green technologies on Algeria’s ecological future. Journal of Environmental Management, 355, 120426.‏
11.   Bernard Jr, B. M., Song, Y., Hena, S., Ahmad, F., & Wang, X. (2022). Assessing Africa’s agricultural TFP for food security and effects on human development: evidence from 35 countries. Sustainability, 14(11), 6411. DOI: 10.3390/su14116411.‏
12.   Bouteska, A., Sharif, T., Bhuiyan, F., & Abedin, M. Z. (2024). Impacts of the changing climate on agricultural productivity and food security: evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141793.‏
13.   Çakar, N. D., Gedikli, A., Erdoğan, S., & Yıldırım, D. Ç. (2021). Exploring the nexus between human capital and environmental degradation: the case of EU countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113057.‏
14.   Can, M. F., Mazlum, Y., & Erkan, B. (2023). Is there a relationship between human development and dependence on fisheries? Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 52(2), 245-257.‏
15.   Cansino-Loeza, B., Bazán-Ramírez, S. Y., & Ponce-Ortega, J. M. (2024). Optimizing the water-energy-food nexus system considering the human development index. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8(4), 1193-1208. DOI: 10.1007/s41660-024-00422-6.‏
16.   Chandio, A. A., Gokmenoglu, K. K., Joyo, M. A., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Modeling the climate change impacts on major fruits production: recent evidence from Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae, 324, 112618.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112618.
17.   Conceição, P. (2020). Human development report 2020: the next frontier—human development and the Anthropocene. Human Development Report Office, UNDP, New York, NY, USA.
18.   Delgado, A., Egea, J. A., Luedeling, E., & Dapena, E. (2021). Agroclimatic requirements and phenological responses to climate change of local apple cultivars in northwestern Spain. Scientia Horticulturae, 283, 110093.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110093.
19.   Di Falco, S., & Veronesi, M. (2013). How can African agriculture adapt to climate change? A counterfactual analysis from Ethiopia. Land Economics, 89(4), 743-766.‏
20.   Fahrika, A. I., Salam, H., & Buhasyim, M. A. (2020). Effect of human development index (HDI), unemployment, and investment realization toward poverty in South Sulawesi-Indonesia. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 2(2), 110-116.‏
21.   FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO (2020). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome, FAO.
22.   Ferranti, P., Berry, E. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2019). The concept of food security. Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, 2, 1-7.‏
23.   Fischer, G., Shah, M., Tubiello, F. N., & Van Velhuizen, H. (2005). Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990-2080. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1463), 2067-2083.‏ DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1744.
24.   Fróna, D., Szenderák, J., & Harangi-Rákos, M. (2019). The challenge of feeding the world. Sustainability, 11(20), 5816.‏
25.   Gani, A., & Chand Prasad, B. (2007). Food security and human development. International Journal of Social Economics, 34(5), 310-319.‏
26.   Hodgson, D., Bains, P., & Moorhouse, J. (2022). Bioenergy–analysis-IEA. International Energy Agsncy (IEA), BIoenergy. France. Available at https://www.iea.org/reports/bioenergy. Retrieved at 17 March, 2023.
27.   IEA (2023). World energy outlook 2023. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France.
28.   IRENA, & FAO (2021). Renewable energy and agri-food systems: advancing energy and food security towards sustainable development goals and the Paris agreement. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Abu Dhabi and Rome. DOI: 10.4060/cb7433en.‏
29.   Jakaria, J. T., & Lutfi, M. Y. (2022). Food security and human development: difference between potential and reality in Asean countries. Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia (p. 116), European Alliance for Innovation.‏
30.   Kabir, M., & Ekici, S. (2024). Energy-agriculture nexus: exploring the future of artificial intelligence applications. Energy Nexus, 13, 100263. DOI: 10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100263.‏
31.   Khurshid, N., & Abid, E. (2024). Unraveling the complexity! Exploring asymmetries in climate change, political globalization, and food security in the case of Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 8, 100220.‏
32.   Kogo, B. K., Kumar, L., & Koech, R. (2021). Climate change and variability in Kenya: a review of impacts on agriculture and food security. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), 23-43.‏
33.   Koondhar, M. A., Li, H., Wang, H., Bold, S., & Kong, R. (2020). Looking back over the past two decades on the nexus between air pollution, energy consumption, and agricultural productivity in China: a qualitative analysis based on the ARDL bounds testing model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 13575-13589.‏
34.   Kumar, P., Sahu, N. C., Kumar, S., & Ansari, M. A. (2021). Impact of climate change on cereal production: evidence from lower-middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(37), 51597-51611.‏
35.   Lamba, A., Novan, R., Lamba, R. A., & Patma, K. (2020). The impact of economic growth and capital expenditures in supporting quality human development. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 2(2), 100-109.‏
36.   Lobell, D. B., & Field, C. B. (2008). Estimation of the carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization effect using growth rate anomalies of CO2 and crop yields since 1961. Global Change Biology, 14(1), 39-45.‏
37.   Mangaraj, B. K., & Aparajita, U. (2020). Constructing a generalized model of the human development index. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70, 100778.‏
38.   Mehdi, S. (2011). The effects of human capital on agricultural sector: the case of Iran. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 1(4), 55-6.‏
39.   Mehdizadeh Rayeni, M. J., Ziaee, S., Salarpour, M., Mohammadi, H., & Ahmadpour, M. (2021). The asymmetric effects of energy consumption on growth of iran's agricultural sector using Nonlinear Auto-Regression Distributed Lads (NARDL). Quarterly Energy Economics Review (QEER), 16(67), 57-86. [In Persian]
40.   Otim, J., Watundu, S., Mutenyo, J., Bagire, V., & Adaramola, M. S. (2023). Effects of carbon dioxide emissions on agricultural production indexes in East African community countries: pooled mean group and fixed effect approaches. Energy Nexus, 12, 100247.‏
41.   Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197-208.‏
42.   Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J., Kastner, T., Moran, D., Schmidt, S., & Wood, R. (2019). Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Global Environmental Change, 56, 1-10.‏
43.   Pickson, R. B., & Boateng, E. (2022). Climate change: a friend or foe to food security in Africa? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 4387-4412. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01621-8.‏
44.   Rahman, M., Chowdhury, M. M. I., Al Amran, M. I. U., Malik, K., ... & Rahman, S. M. (2024). Impacts of climate change on food system security and sustainability in Bangladesh. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 15(5), 2162-2187. DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2024.631.
45.   Rehman, A., Batool, Z., Ma, H., Alvarado, R., & Oláh, J. (2024). Climate change and food security in South Asia: the importance of renewable energy and agricultural credit. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-11.‏
46.   Rehman, A., Rauf, A., Ahmad, M., Chandio, A. A., & Zhang, D. Y. (2019). The effect of carbon dioxide emission and the consumption of electrical energy, fossil fuel energy, and renewable energy, on economic performance: evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 21760-21773. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05550-y. ‏
47.   Rehman, M. A., Fareed, Z., Salem, S., Kanwal, A., & Pata, U. K. (2021). Do diversified export, agriculture, and cleaner energy consumption induce atmospheric pollution in Asia? Application of method of moments quantile regression. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 781097.‏
48.   Rosegrant, M. W., Sulser, T. B., Dunston, S., Mishra, A., Cenacchi, N., Gebretsadik, Y., ... & Wiebe, K. (2024). Food and nutrition security under changing climate and socioeconomic conditions. Global Food Security, 41, 100755.‏
49.   Sarkodie, S. A., & Owusu, P. A. (2017). The relationship between carbon dioxide, crop and food production index in Ghana by estimating the long-run elasticities and variance decomposition. Environmental Engineering Research, 22(2), 193-202. DOI: 10.4491/eer.2016.135.‏
50.   Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Sickles, R., Horrace, W. (eds) Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, NY. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9.‏
51.   Soni, S., & RL, M. (2024). The dynamic nexus between agricultural productivity and renewable energy consumption in BRICS: the role of financial inclusion and foreign direct investment. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(6), 1885-1904.‏ DOI: 10.1108/ijesm-08-2023-0028.
52.   Wei, J., Guo, X., Marinova, D., & Fan, J. (2014). Industrial SO2 pollution and agricultural losses in China: evidence from heavy air polluters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 404-413.‏
53.   Woods, J., Williams, A., Hughes, J. K., Black, M., & Murphy, R. (2010). Energy and the food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2991-3006.‏