Agricultural Economics and Development

Agricultural Economics and Development

Examining the Possibility of Substitution between Farm Inputs and Marketing Services of Livestock Products

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Graduate in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
10.30490/aead.2025.367489.1684
Abstract
Introduction: Given the high concentration of the food industry market in Iran and the events of recent years, including the Covid-19 pandemic, it is essential to examine the potential for substitution between farm inputs and marketing services. This investigation will help determine the derived demand functions. Therefore, this research aimed at examining the possibility of substitution and the elasticity of substitution for farm inputs and marketing services regarding red meat, chicken, egg, and milk products from spring 2015 to winter 2022. The present research introduced two main innovations that would distinguish it from previous studies on the farm input and marketing relationship in Iran. First, to estimate price and income elasticities, the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) was employed. This model offers more reliable results than traditional methods due to its higher flexibility and precision. Second, this study explicitly incorporated the COVID-19 pandemic to investigate the effect of this shock on demand relationships and elasticities. The pandemic and its limitations directly impacted household food prices and consumption by creating uncertainty and disrupting supply chains. These measures sharply reduced economic activity, ultimately affecting household income and consumer behavior. By incorporating these changes into the model, this research provided a more accurate and up-to-date analysis of the farm input and marketing relationship, the results of which were vital for current market conditions.
Materials and Methods: To investigate the possibility of substitution between farm inputs and marketing services, Wohlgenant’s model (1989) was utilized. This analysis required the examination of price and income elasticities, which were obtained from the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS). In order to calculate the price and income elasticities, the price and per capita consumption data of livestock products were needed. In this research, seasonal time series data for the period of spring 2015-winter 2022 were used. The information related to the price of livestock products was obtained from the Joint Stock Company of the Support of Livestock Affairs. To calculate per capita consumption, we first gathered data on the production amounts of red meat, chicken, milk, and eggs from the Joint Stock Company for Livestock Affairs. Then, by summing the amount of output and the amount of import of red meat, chicken, milk and eggs and deducting the amount of export from the concerned amount and dividing it by the population of the country, the amount of consumption per capita was calculated. The amount of export and import of red meat, chicken, milk and eggs was extracted from the export and import report of the Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ) of Iran, which is published monthly. Also, according to the investigation of the possibility of replacing farm inputs and marketing services, the information related to the index of meat processing and storage and the production of dairy products were obtained from the data collected by the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) and the population information was obtained from the estimated data of the Statistical Center of Iran (SCI).
Results and Discussion: The results of the elasticity calculation indicated that red meat and milk were luxury goods for Iranian consumers, and chicken and eggs were essential goods; also, the demand for red meat, chicken, eggs, and fish was inelastic in terms of price. The characteristics of symmetry and constant returns to scale were checked using the Wald test and based on the chi-square statistic. The elasticity calculation results showed that, for Iranian consumers, red meat and milk were considered luxury goods, whereas chicken and eggs were categorized as essential goods. In addition, the demand for red meat, chicken, eggs, and fish was found to be inelastic with respect to price. Therefore, support policies should focus on providing the minimum protein requirements for low-income households through schemes such as electronic food coupons to prevent essential goods from becoming inaccessible luxuries. Furthermore, given the low values of both self-price and cross-price elasticities, utilizing pricing policies for goods substitution may not be very effective in applying optimal demand management and consumption pattern planning. It is important to note that as mentioned earlier, the Wald test was used to verify the characteristics of symmetry and constant returns to scale, based on the chi-square statistic. The results indicated that the characteristics of symmetry and constant returns to scale were upheld. In fact, the marketing sector for livestock products operates competitively with constant returns to scale. The positive elasticity of substitution found for red meat, chicken, eggs, and milk suggests a substitution relationship between farm inputs and marketing services. Additionally, the significant elasticity of substitution for chicken, eggs, and milk confirms the existence of substitution between these inputs.
Conclusion and Suggestions: Considering the potential for substitutability among farm inputs, the implementation of waste reduction methods is crucial. This includes utilizing more skilled labor in the slaughtering and processing of products, enhancing equipment and technology in poultry farms, supporting the growth of packaging industries, and improving transportation processes. These measures are suggested to extend the shelf life of products.
Keywords

Subjects


1.      Asghari, A. R., & Aghapour Sabbaghi, M. (2016). An assessment of livestock and poultry, pp. 133-158 [In Persian]
2.      Ataei Salout, K., & Mohammadi, H. (2018). Determining the demand elasticity of selection food product in Mazandaran province using Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS), case study: chicken, aquatic and beef meat. Agricultural Economics Research, 10(39), 173-186.
3.      Banks, J., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 527-539.
4.      Bopape, E. L. (2006). The influence of demand model selection on household welfare estimates: an application to South African food expenditures. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University, USA (pp. 177).
5.      Deaton, A. S., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, 70(3), 312-326.
6.      Elzaki, R., Sisman, M. Y., & Al-Mahish, M. (2021). Rural Sudanese household food consumption patterns. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 20(1), 58-65.
7.      Falsafian, A., & Ghahremanzadeh, M. (2012). Proper functional form selection to analyze meat demand in Iran. Food Research Journal, 22(2), 175- 187.
8.      Fathi, F., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2014). The relationship between farm-gate and consumer demand for meat products in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 27(4), 300-308. [In Persian]
9.      Gardner, B. L. (1975). The farm-retail price spread in a competitive food industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), 399-409.
10.  Geoffrey, M. P., Capps, O., & Clauson, A. (2005). Demand for non-alcoholic beverages: evidence from the ACNielsen home scan panel. The American Agricultural Economics, 44, 159-170.
11.  Hosseini, S. S., Nikookar, A., Shahbazi, H., & Ghorbani, M. (2008). Assessment of production relation in the agricultural marketing process in Iran (case study: livestock and chicken industry). Journal of Agriculture, Science and Food Industries, 21(2), 99-110. [In Persian]
12.  Hosseini, S. S., & Shahbazi, H. (2010). A model of Iran’s farm-retail marketing margin for beef. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 12(3), 255-264.
13.  Korir, L., Rizov, M., & Ruto, E. (2018). Analysis of household food demand and its implications on food security in Kenya: an application of QUAIDS model. Ageconsearch, 2111-2018-4123. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.273474.
14.  Laili, F., Anindita, R., & Baladina, N. (2021). Indonesian household demand for essential animal proteins and their pattern of price volatility during the Covid-19 season. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 803(1), 012058.
15.  Lee, Y., Li, Q., & Çakır, M. (2023). Elasticities of substitution between marketing and farm inputs in a complete system of food commodities. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 45(3), 1450-1471.
16.  Rezvani, M., & Pendar, M. (2024). Examining the conditions of aggregation and analyzing the demand for animal protein products. Agricultural Economics and Development, 32(1), 255-276. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2024.364466.1576.
17.  Rezvani, M., Pendar, M., Hosseini, E. S., & Rafiee, H. (2025). Assessment of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the analysis of demand for livestock products using a switching regression framework. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development, 39(3), 211-224. DOI: 10.22067/jead.2025.90323.1303.
18.  Roll, S., Chun, Y., Kondratjeva, O., Despard, M., Schwartz-Tayri T. M., & Grinstein-Weiss, M. (2022). Household spending patterns and hardships during COVID-19: a comparative study of the U.S. and Israel. J. Fam. Econ., 43, 261-281.
19.  Wohlgenant, M. K., & Haidacher, (1987). Retail to farm linkage of a complete demand system of food commodity. Final Report on USDA Cooperative Agreement. No. 58-3523-4-00278.
20.  Wohlgenant, M. K. (1989). Demand for farm output in a complete system of demand functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 241-252.