اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

بررسی وضعیت اقتصادی و زیست‏‌محیطی گل محمدی در منطقه سیستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
مجتبی داورپناه 1
ماشاا.. سالارپور 2
محمود احمدپور برازجانی 3
محمدرضا اصغری پور 4
سامان ضیائی 3
علیرضا کیخا 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه زراعت، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران
10.30490/aead.2024.367172.1628
چکیده
کشاورزی یکی از زمینه‌های اصلی نیازمند توجه در راستای دستیابی به توسعه پایدار به‌‏شمار می‏‌رود. از این‏‌رو، پرداختن به مشکلات اقتصادی، زیست‌محیطی و اخلاقی در سراسر جهان ضروری است. پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی وضعیت اقتصادی و پایداری گل محمدی، در منطقه سیستان صورت پذیرفت. آمار و اطلاعات مورد نیاز از طریق مصاحبه حضوری و تکمیل پرسشنامه از 86 باغدار منطقه سیستان در سال زراعی 1400-1401 به‌­دست آمد. تحلیل داده‌­ها با استفاده از روش‏‌های امرژی (EYR)، حاشیه بازار و رگرسیون فضایی صورت گرفت. نسبت عملکرد امرژی (EYR) برای نظام‌های تولید گل محمدی در شهرستان­های زابل، زهک (بخش مرکزی)، زهک (بخش جزینک)، هیرمند و نیمروز (بخش صابری)، به‏‌ترتیب، 033/6، 356/8، 750/11، 823/6 و 326/11 بود. کمترین و بیشترین حاشیه خرده‌فروشی در محصولات گل محمدی و گلاب، به‌‏ترتیب، در شهرستان‌‏های نیمروز و زابل مشاهده شد. بررسی کارآیی فنی محصولات بین مناطق مختلف نشان‏‌دهنده بالا بودن این شاخص برای محصول گلاب در شهرستان زابل بود. مقدار 2R در مدل رگرسیون ساده برابر با 0/63 بود و رگرسیون فضایی 0/99 به ‏دست آمد. در خصوص حاشیه بازاریابی برای محصول گلاب در منطقه سیستان، می­‌توان گفت که علاوه بر سایر عوامل مؤثر در حاشیه بازاریابی، ‌موقعیت کشاورزان نسبت به مناطق مجاور (به لحاظ موقعیت فضایی) نیز تأثیر مستقیم و معنی‏‌دار بر نمونه‌های مجاور از نظر حاشیه بازاریابی این محصول دارد. از آنجا که گلاب به‌­عنوان یک محصول فرآوری‏‌شده مطرح بوده و پایداری نظام تولید گل محمدی به لحاظ زیست‏‌محیطی در شهرستان زابل مطلوب‌‏تر از سایر مناطق مورد بررسی است، با اعمال سیاست افزایش سطح زیر کشت و ایجاد تغییرات فناوری در زمینه کشت، فرآوری و صنایع تبدیلی، می­توان گامی مهم در راستای پایداری و توانمندسازی اقتصادی بهره‌برداران برداشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بار زیست‌محیطی
حاشیه بازار
موقعیت فضایی
گل محمدی
گلاب
سیستان (منطقه)

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Economic and Environmental Status of Damask Rose in Sistan Region of Iran

نویسندگان English

Mojtaba davarpanah 1
mashaalah Salarpour 2
mahmoud ahmadpour borazjani 3
Mohammadreza Asgharipour 4
Saman Ziaee 3
Alireza Keikha 2
1 PhD Student in Agricultural Economics , Zabol University, Zabol, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics , Zabol University, Zabol, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics , Zabol University, Zabol, Iran
4 Associate Professor of Agronomy , Zabol University, Zabol
چکیده English

Introduction: In order to achieve a sustainable development, it is imperative to prioritize agriculture as a key sector and effectively tackle global economic, environmental, and ethical challenges. The sustainable supply chain encompasses the efficient coordination of material, information, and financial flows among companies within the supply chain. It also involves aligning the goals of sustainable development, including economic, environmental, and social dimensions, with the demands of customers and stakeholders. Given the unfavorable climatic conditions in Sistan region of Iran, it is crucial to prioritize the production of products that can both facilitate the participation of farmers in an economic development and minimize damage to environmental resources.
Materials and Methods: This study aimed at investigating the economic condition and long-term viability of the Damask rose in the Sistan region. Data and insights were gathered through personal interviews and questionnaires from individuals involved in the cultivation, wholesale, retail, and distribution of Damask rose and rose water in the region during the period of 2021-2022. The study examined and analyzed production systems by utilizing four types of resources: free renewable environmental inputs (R), free non-renewable environmental inputs (N), free renewable inputs (FR), and non-free non-renewable inputs (FN). The marketing margin was analyzed using both a simple regression equation (econometric model) and geographic weighted regression (GWR) techniques. The estimation was performed using EVIEWSV5 and GIS software. 
Results and Discussion: The free renewable environmental inputs (R) for the production systems of Damask rose in the cities of Zabol, Zahak (Central and Jazinak districts), Hirmand, and Nimruz (Sabori district) were estimated 7.03E+14, 6.43E+14, 8.13E+14, 6.4E+14 sej ha-1, respectively. The quantity of free renewable environmental inputs (R) in this system for the specified areas was found as 1.43E+16, 1.70E+16, 2.23E+16, 1.65E+16, and 2.86E+16 sej ha-1, respectively. The Damask rose production system in Zabol city had the highest EIR index value (0.199), while the rose production system in Zahak city (Jazinak district) had the lowest value (0.093). The ESI* values for the production systems of Damask rose in the mentioned areas were 0.398, 0.441, 0.566, 0.390, and 0.537, respectively. The ESI* values indicated a greater sustainability in the surveyed areas compared to the ESI values. The marketing margin analysis also revealed that the lowest retail sales margin was estimated for rose and rose sub-products in Nimruz (Central district) and Nimruz (Sabori district), respectively. Conversely, the highest margin was observed in Zabol city for both rose and rose sub-products. The rose water product in Zabol city showed the highest level of technical efficiency, with a technical inefficiency score of 0.007. On the other hand, the Central district of Nimruz city was found to be the most inefficient area in terms of both Damask rose and rose water production, particularly in terms of price efficiency. The R2 value in the simple regression model was 0.62, while in the spatial regression model, it was 0.3. This suggests that spatial factors do not significantly impact the marketing margin of this product. The results of both equations are similar, indicating that the marketing margin for this product is not influenced by the geographical location of farmers in different regions. Conversely, the rose water product indicated an R2 value of 0.63 in the simple regression model, while the spatial regression yielded a value of 0.99. The success of the rose water product in the Sistan region is influenced by various factors, including the location of the farmers. The spatial position of the farmers has a direct and significant impact on the marketing of the product, particularly in the adjacent areas. The study findings showed a substantial and statistically significant impact of marketing expenses on the market profit margin. Specifically, for each incremental unit increase in marketing costs, the marketing margin increases by 27.76 units.
Conclusion and Suggestions: Considering the rose water as a sub-product or processed product, it is worth noting the environmental advantages of the rose water produced in Zabol city compared to other areas. Therefore, processing these products can greatly benefit the farmers in terms of economic capability and increased profits from sales. By implementing a policy that focuses on increasing technological advancements and expanding the cultivation of Damask rose in the region, while also incorporating new processing and conversion technologies, two primary objectives of sustainability and economic empowerment for users can be achieved.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Environmental Load
Market Margin
Spatial Status
Damask Rose
Rose Water
Sistan (Region of Iran)
  • Aminifar, Z., Kariminejad, N., & Erabi, M. (2014). Selection and prioritization of sustainability indicators in agricultural supply chain management with the help of AHP method. International Conference on Sustainable Development, Strategies and Challenges with a Focus on Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism, Tabriz. Available at https://civilica.com/doc/354833. [In Persian]
  • Amiri, Z., Asgharipour, M.R., Campbell, D.E., Azizi, K., Kakolvand, E., & Hassani Moghadam, E. (2021). Conservation agriculture, a selective model based on emergy analysis for sustainable production of shallot as a medicinal-industrial plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126000
  • Amiri, Z., Asgharipour, M. R., Campbell, D. E., & Armin, M. (2019). A sustainability analysis of two rapeseed farming ecosystems in Khorramabad, Iran, based on emergy and economic analyses. Journal of cleaner production, 226, 1051-1066. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.091
  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Dord Drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Asgharipour, M. R., Shahgholi, H., Campbell, D. E., Khamari, I., & Ghadiri, A. (2019). Comparison of the sustainability of bean production systems based on emergy and economic analyses. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(1), 2-11.
  • Azizi, K., & Heidari, S. (2013). A comparative study on energy balance and economic indices in irrigated and dry landbarley production systems. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10, 1019-1028. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-012-0157-0.
  • Ballou, R., Gilbert, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2000). New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities. International Marketing Management, 29(1), 7-18. DOI: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00107-8.
  • Bastianoni, S., Marchettini, N., Panzieri, M., & Tiezzi, E. (2009). Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 365-373. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00079-2.
  • Brandt-Williams, S. L. (2002). Emergy of Florida Agriculture. In: Handbook of emergy evaluation: a compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of Follos, Folio #4. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
  • Brown, M. T., & Ulgiati, S. (2004). Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H. T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecological Modelling, 178, 201-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.002.
  • Brown, M. T., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). Assessing the global environmental sources driving the geobiosphere: a revised emergy baseline. Ecological Modelling, 339, 126-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.017.
  • Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A.S., & Charlton, M. (1996). Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationary. Geographical Analysis, 28(4), 281-298.
  • Burma, Z. A. (2014). Human resource management and its importance for today’s organizations. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(2), 85-94.
  • Campbell, D. E., Brandt-Williams, S. L., & Meisch, M. E. A. (2005). Environmental accounting using emergy: evaluation of the State of West Virginia. USEPA, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, pp. 116.
  • Cavalett, O., & Ortega, E. (2009). Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 762-771. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.022.
  • Charlton, M., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2009). Geographically weighted regression. National Centre for Geocomputation, National University of Ireland Maynooth.
  • Dirani, A., & Ahmad, A. (2016). Exploring the determinants of an agricultural anomaly: the case of the Damask Rose (Rosa damascena) value chain in Qasarnaba, Lebanon. AUB Scholar Works.‏
  • Dzoyem, J. P., Santosh, K. G., Constant, A. P., Victor, K., Akash, Sh., Inshad, A. Kh., Ajit, K. S., & Ram A. V. (2013). Cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of selected Cameroonian edible plants. BMC Complement Altern Med, 6882, 13-78. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-78.
  • Fallahinejad, S., Armin, M., & Asgharipour, M. R. (2021). A survey on the ecological sustainability of introducing new crops in the cropping pattern using emergy approach. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100083. DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100083.
  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (1996). The geography of parameter space: an investigation of spatial non-stationary. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 10, 605-627. DOI: 10.1080/02693799608902100.
  • Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M., & Brunsdon, C. (1997). Two techniques for exploring non-stationarity in geographical data. Geographical Systems, 4, 59-82.
  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2009). Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester, Wiley.
  • German, L. A., Anya, M. B., Laura, C. F., & Lorenzo, C. (2020). “Inclusive business” in agriculture: evidence from the evolution of agricultural value chains. Journal of World Development, 134, Article 105018. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105018.
  • Ghasemi Mobtaker, H., Akram, A., & Keyhani, A. (2010). Investigation of energy consumption of perennial Alfalfa production, case study: Hamedan province. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8, 379-381.
  • Giannetti, B. F., Ogura, Y., Bonilla, S. H., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2011). Emergy assessment of a coffee farm in Brazilian Cerrado considering in a broad form the environmental services, negative externalities and fair price. Agricultural Systems, 104(9), 679-688. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.08.001.
  • Giray, F. H., Kart, M., & Omerci, C. (2012). Economics of Rosa damascena in Isparta, Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18(5), 658-667.
  • Hosseini, S. S., Nikookar, A., & Dourandish, A. (2010). Analysis of market structure and the impact of price transmission on marketing margin in Iranian beef market. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 2-41(2), 147-157. DOR: 1001.1.20084838.1389.241.2.3.9. [In Persian]
  • Jafari, M., Asgharipour, M. R., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., & Hadarbadi, G. (2018). Sustainability assessment of date and pistachio agricultural systems using energy, emergy and economic approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 642-651. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.089.
  • Khaksar Astaneh, H., Yaghoubi, M., & Kalateharabi, V. (2014). Determining revealed comparative advantage and target markets for Iran's stone fruits. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16(2), 253-264. DOR: 20.1001.1.16807073.2014.16.2.14.0.
  • Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Yousefi, M., & Movahedi, M. (2013). Modeling of energy consumption andGHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Isfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks.Energy, 52, 333-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.028.
  • Lee, J., & Wong, D. W. (2001). Statistical analysis with arc view GIS. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Lefroy, E., & Rydberg, T. (2003). Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia. Ecological Modelling, 161, 195-211. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00341-1.
  • Lokko, Y., Heijde, M., Schebesta, K., Scholt`es, P., Van Montagu, M., & Giacca, M. (2018). Biotechnology and the bioeconomy: towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. New Biotechnology, 40, 5- DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.005.
  • Mirshekari, S., Dahmardeh, M., Asgharipour, M. R., Ghanbari, A., & Seyedabadi, E. (2021). Sustainability assessment of six crop production systems based on emergy and economic analysis in Hirmand City. Journal of Agroecology, 13(3), 539-561. DOR: 20.1001.1.20087713.1400.13.3.11.4. [In Persian]
  • Navarrete, S. D. S., Borini, F. M., & Avrichir, I. (2020). Environmental upgrading and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121563.
  • Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley.
  • Odum, H. T. (2000). Folio #2, emergy of global processes. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville.
  • Ortega, E., Cavalett, O., Bonifácio, R., & Watanabe, M. (2005). Brazilian soybean production: emergy analysis with an expanded scope. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 25(4), 323-334. DOI: 10.1177/0270467605278367.
  • Pelliciardi, V., Varvaro, L., & Pulselli, F. M. (2014). Emergy evaluation of a traditional farming system, case study: Leh District (Ladakh-Indian Trans-Himalaya). European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3, 1-8. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.
  • Pyakurel, D., Sharma, I. B., & Smith-Hall, C. (2018). Patterns of change: the dynamics of medicinal plant trade in far-western Nepal. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 224, 323-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.06.004.
  • Quintero-Angel, M. & González-Acevedo, A. (2018). Tendencies and challenges for the assessment of agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 254, 273-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.030.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,
  • 254 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
  • Ripen, J. E., & Noweg, G. T. (2016). Economic valuation of medicinal plants in Jagoi area, Bau, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 124-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.415.
  • Sadr al-Ashrafi, M., & Karbasi, A. (2014). Investigating the marketing margins of grapes and raisins in Iran. Journal of Commerce. 237, 213-35. [In Persian]
  • Shrestha, K., Shah, I. H., Liu, Z., & Park, H. S. (2021). Efficiency assessment in co-production systems based on modified emergy accounting approach. Ecological Indicators, 126, 1-7.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107675.
  • Soleimanipoor, A., Nikoei, A., & Bagheri, A. (2005). A study of marketing issues of damask rose and its products (rose and essential oil): a case study in Kashan. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences. 9(1), 73-89. DOR: 1001.1.22518517.1384.9.1.6.9. [In Persian]
  • Su, Y., He, S., Wang, K., Shahtahmassebi, A. R., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., & Gan, M. (2020). Quantifying the sustainability of three types of agricultural production in China: an emergy analysis with the integration of environmental pollution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119650. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119650.
  • Su, Y., Xia, P., Yu, R., Wang, X., Wang, C., Jiang, J., & Li, Y. (2023). Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of different planting systems in China: implications for coordinating poverty alleviation and rural revitalization. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21(1), 2247799. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2023.2247799.
  • Tavakoli Dehaghani, M. R., Shahverdiani, S., & Mousapour, H. (2018). Sustainable supply chain and environmental and financial performance. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 22(85), 171-194. [In Persian]
  • Vafabakhsh, J., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2019). Energy flow and GHG emissions in major field and horticultural crop production systems (case study: Sharifabad Plain). Journal of Agroecology, 11(2), 365-382. DOI: 22067/jag.v11i2.81742. [In Persian]
  • Vandermeer, J. (2011). The inevitability of surprise in agroecosystems. Ecological Complexity, 8(4), 377-482. DOI: 1016/j.ecocom.2011.10.001.
  • Volenzo, T., & Odiyo, J. (2020). Integrating endemic medicinal plants into the global value chains: the ecological degradation challenges and opportunities. Journal of Heliyon. 6(9), 49-70.
  • Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Zhang, J., & Wu, X. (2014). Emergy analysis of grain production systems on large-scale farms in the North China Plain based on LCA. Agricultural Systems, 128, 66-78.
  • Zamzami, P., Poursaeed, A., & Farajollah Hoseeini, S. (2022). A model to stabilize the livelihood of gardeners on the shores of Lake Urmia against late spring cold: using a grounded theory approach. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 53(1), 55-74. DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.327178.669062. [In Persian]
  • Zhang, G J., & Long, W. D. (2010). A key review on emergy analysis and assessment of biomass resources for a sustainable future. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2948- DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.032.
  • Zhang, L. X., Song, B., & Chen, B. (2012). Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 28, 33-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.042.
  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S. M. (2007). Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64, 253-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024.