اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی چالش‌های مدیریت زنجیره تأمین هوشمند گندم با رویکرد توسعه پایدار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، مدیریت صنعتی و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
زنجیره تأمین هوشمند گندم به‌عنوان یکی از ارکان اصلی امنیت غذایی و توسعه پایدار دارای نقشی بی‌بدیل در ارتقای بهره‌وری، کاهش ضایعات و بهینه‌سازی مصرف منابع طبیعی بوده و استقرار موفق آن مستلزم شناسایی و مدیریت نظام‌مند چالش‌های زیست‏‌محیطی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی مؤثر بر فرآیند تحول دیجیتال در کشاورزی است. در پژوهش حاضر، با هدف شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی چالش‌های استقرار زنجیره تأمین هوشمند گندم در ایران، از ترکیبی از روش‌های پژوهش کیفی و تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره فازی بهره گرفته شد. ابتدا با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، چالش‌های اساسی از منابع علمی معتبر استخراج و سپس، با بهره‌گیری از روش دلفی فازی و اخذ نظرات خبرگان دانشگاهی، دولتی و صنعتی، این چالش‌ها اعتبارسنجی شدند. در ادامه، به روش فوکام فازی، اولویت‌بندی چالش‌ها بر اساس میزان اهمیت و تأثیرگذاری آنها صورت گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مصرف بالای انرژی، فقدان نظام‌های مؤثر بازیافت تجهیزات دیجیتال، کمبود شایستگی‌های دیجیتال و فناورانه در میان ذی‌نفعان، ضعف سیاست‌های حمایتی، هزینه‌های بالای فناوری‌های نوین و موانع ناشی از تحریم‌های بین‌المللی از جمله چالش‌های کلیدی و بازدارنده به‏شمار می‏روند. برای مواجهه مؤثر با این چالش‌ها، در سطح کلان، تشکیل «ستاد ملی کشاورزی هوشمند»، تدوین نقشه راه جامع، طراحی مشوق‌های مالی برای استفاده از انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر، گسترش زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی و داده‌محور و تقویت تولید داخلی فناوری‌های کشاورزی پیشنهاد می‌شود. در سطح اجرایی نیز توسعه آموزش‌های مهارتی متناسب با فناوری‌های نوین، ایجاد مراکز تخصصی بازیافت تجهیزات دیجیتال، بهره‌گیری از مدل‌های اقتصادی نوآورانه نظیر «همه چیز به‌عنوان خدمت» و حمایت هدفمند از کسب‌وکارهای فناورانه کشاورزی ضرورت دارد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر می‌تواند ضمن ارتقای ادبیات علمی حوزه زنجیره تأمین هوشمند، مبنایی برای تدوین سیاست‌های دقیق، توسعه ظرفیت‌های فناورانه بومی و تحقق توسعه پایدار در زنجیره‌های تأمین کشاورزی کشور فراهم آورد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Identifying and Prioritizing the Smart Wheat Supply Chain Management Barriers with a Sustainable Development Approach

نویسندگان English

Ali Otarkhani 1
Somaye Alemi Neisi 2
Abbas Raad 1
Alireza Hassanzadeh 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management and Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD Candidate for Industrial Management and Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Wheat is one of the most strategic agricultural commodities globally serving as a critical foundation for food security, national economic stability, and sustainable development. In Iran, wheat has a particularly vital role, not only because it constitutes a major share of household caloric intake but also because it symbolizes self-sufficiency efforts in the agricultural sector. Nevertheless, the traditional wheat supply chain in Iran is characterized by inefficiencies including excessive consumption of water and energy, limited utilization of digital technologies, low transparency in information flow, outdated infrastructure, and multiple economic and policy-related constraints. These inefficiencies are further exacerbated by the country's vulnerability to climate change, water scarcity, and international sanctions, which together pose significant challenges to maintaining and improving food security. The advent of smart supply chain technologies, including the Internet of Things, blockchain, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and digital twins, has opened new pathways for improving supply chain efficiency, traceability, and sustainability. A smart wheat supply chain can enable real-time monitoring of production, predictive analytics for resource optimization, transparent transactions among stakeholders, and resilient logistics systems that are adaptable to environmental and market shocks. Transitioning to such a model is increasingly seen as not merely an option but a necessity for Iran’s agricultural future. However, this transformation is neither simple nor automatic. It is hampered by multiple technological, social, economic, and environmental barriers, the identification and prioritization of which are critical for effective policy formulation and implementation.
Materials and Methods: The present study was designed to systematically identify, validate, and prioritize the key challenges associated with managing a smart wheat supply chain within the framework of sustainable development. A qualitative research strategy was employed, combining meta-synthesis, fuzzy Delphi, and fuzzy FOCUM methodologies. Initially, a comprehensive meta-synthesis was conducted on scholarly articles published between 2014 and 2024, accessed through reputable databases such as Web of Science and Scopus. Inclusion criteria mandated that articles should address technological, environmental, economic, or social barriers to smart supply chain implementation.
Following the extraction of relevant challenges from the literature, a fuzzy Delphi method was utilized to validate these barriers. A panel of 23 experts participated in two iterative rounds of the Delphi process. This fuzzy approach was selected to handle uncertainties inherent in expert opinions and to provide a more nuanced assessment. Finally, the validated challenges were prioritized using the fuzzy FOCUM. This method offers an efficient and consistency-checked prioritization of factors by requiring fewer pairwise comparisons than traditional methods like AHP, making it particularly suitable for complex decision-making scenarios with multiple criteria under uncertainty.
Results and Discussion: The analysis resulted in the identification of a wide range of barriers, which were classified into three main dimensions as follows: (1) Environmental barriers included high energy consumption during production and transportation, lack of recycling systems for electronic and smart agricultural equipment, dependency on non-renewable energy sources, and inefficient water resource management. These factors not only increase operational costs but also undermine the environmental sustainability of the wheat supply chain, posing risks to long-term agricultural resilience in Iran's water-scarce context; (2) Social challenges were found to be particularly complex and multi-layered. A significant proportion of farmers and supply chain actors displayed limited digital literacy, with inadequate access to training programs that could bridge the technological knowledge gap. Cultural resistance to change, lack of trust in new technologies, and weak collaboration among supply chain participants were also prominent barriers. Moreover, digital divides between rural and urban areas hindered equitable access to smart solutions, creating imbalances in technological adoption. The absence of supportive policies and regulatory frameworks further compounded these challenges, making it difficult to build momentum for widespread digital transformation; and (3) Economic barriers were among the most critical. High initial investment costs for smart technologies, uncertainty regarding return on investment, technological dependence on foreign suppliers, and financial constraints, especially among smallholder farmers and medium-sized enterprises, were major issues. The impact of international sanctions, which restrict access to advanced technologies and international financing, emerged as a uniquely significant barrier in Iran’s case. Furthermore, the lack of robust digital infrastructure, such as high-speed internet connectivity in rural areas, posed additional obstacles to the successful implementation of smart supply chains. In response to these findings, a set of comprehensive policy recommendations were developed. These include the establishment of a National Smart Agriculture Council to orchestrate multi-stakeholder efforts, the formulation of a detailed operational roadmap for smart supply chain transformation, and the provision of financial incentives for renewable energy adoption and local technology development. Expanding digital infrastructure in rural areas, setting up specialized e-waste recycling centers, and adopting flexible financial models such as "Everything-as-a-Service" (XaaS) were also proposed to lower adoption costs and risks. Promoting collaborative ecosystems and enhancing transparency through blockchain technology could additionally support stakeholder trust and cooperation.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The successful development of a smart wheat supply chain in Iran hinges on addressing a complex interplay of environmental, social, and economic barriers. Strategic policymaking at the national level must be complemented by effective institutional coordination and robust capacity-building initiatives at the operational level. There is an urgent need for investment not only in physical infrastructure but also in human capital through training and education programs that can raise digital literacy among all supply chain actors. Moreover, given the unique challenges posed by international sanctions, Iran must pursue localized technological innovation and foster indigenous capacity-building to reduce reliance on external sources. Transparent governance structures, data security frameworks, and regulatory standards must be developed to foster trust and ensure ethical management of digital resources. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering a comprehensive and context-specific analysis of the barriers to smart agricultural supply chain transformation, emphasizing the importance of a holistic and integrated approach that balances technological advancement with environmental stewardship, economic viability, and social inclusiveness. By providing actionable insights, the findings can guide policymakers, researchers, and industry practitioners in designing interventions that not only enhance the efficiency and resilience of the wheat supply chain but also promote broader goals of sustainable agricultural development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Smart Supply Chain
Sustainable Development
Technology Implementation Challenges
Wheat
Food Security
  • Aamer, A. M., Al-Awlaqi, M. A., Affia, I., Arumsari, S., & Mandahawi, N. (2021). The internet of things in the food supply chain: adoption challenges. Benchmarking, 28(8), 2521-2541. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-07-2020-0371.
  • Abbaspour Gilandeh, Y., & Mohtasebi, S. S. (2024). Review of new adaptive ecosystem technologies in smart agriculture. Strategic Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 9(1), 65-76. DOI: 10.22047/srjasnr.2024.192136. [In Persian]
  • Abedi Jafari, A., & Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-synthesis as a method for synthesizing qualitative researches. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(99), 1-15. DOI: 10.30471/mssh.2019.1629. [In Persian]
  • Ajodani, E., Yavari, G., Mahmoodi, A., Khaledi, M., & Nikoukar, A. (2021). An effective model for evaluating wheat supportive government policies: error minimization approach. Agricultural Economics and Development28(4), 269-305. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2021.341377.1189. [In Persian]
  • Alipour, A. , Mousavi, S. H., Khalilian, S., & Mortazavi, A. (2018). Wheat self-sufficiency and population growth in Iran’s 2025 perspective (investigating the role of the guaranteed purchase policy). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(4), 635-649. DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.254163.668578. [In Persian]
  • Allipour Birgani, R., Kiani Rad, A., Takian, A., & Pouraram, H. (2021). Bread wastage in Iran during 2001-2021: a systematic review. Payesh, 20(6), 687-702. DOI: 10.52547/payesh.20.6.687. [In Persian]
  • Amentae, T. K., & Gebresenbet, G. (2021). Digitalization and future agro-food supply chain management: a literature-based implications. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21), 12181. DOI: 10.3390/su132112181.
  • Asem-Hiablie, S., Uyeh, D. D., Iyiola, O., Park, T., & Mallipeddi, R. (2023). Enhancing resilience in agricultural production systems with AI-based technologies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(9), 21955-21983. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03588-0.
  • Balyan, S., Jangir, H., Tripathi, S. N., Tripathi, A., Jhang, T., & Pandey, P. (2024). Seeding a sustainable future: navigating the digital horizon of smart agriculture. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(2), 475. DOI: 10.3390/su16020475.
  • Bayatzadeh, S., & Amiri, M. (2024). Identifying and evaluating supplier selection criteria in Iran’s steel industry according to Industry 4.0 technologies. Innovation Management and Operational Strategies, 5(3), 306-330. DOI: 10.22105/imos.2024.472776.1379. [In Persian]
  • Carmela Annosi, M., Brunetta, F., Capo, F., & Heideveld, L. (2020). Digitalization in the agri-food industry: the relationship between technology and sustainable development. Management Decision, 58(8), 1737-1757. DOI: 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1328.
  • Chanchaichujit, J., Balasubramanian, S., & Shukla, V. (2024). Barriers to Industry 4.0 technology adoption in agricultural supply chains: a Fuzzy Delphi-ISM approach. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 41(7), 1942-1978. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2023-0222.
  • Chiaraluce, G., Bentivoglio, D., Finco, A., Fiore, M., Contò, F., & Galati, A. (2024). Exploring the role of blockchain technology in modern high‑value food supply chains: global trends and future research directions. Springer; Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), 12(1), 1-22. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-024-00301-1.
  • Corallo, A., De Giovanni, M., Latino, M. E., & Menegoli, M. (2024). Leveraging on technology and sustainability to innovate the supply chain: a proposal of agri-food value chain model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(3), 661-683. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-12-2022-0484.
  • Costa, F., Frecassetti, S., Rossini, M., & Portioli-Staudacher, A. (2023). Industry 4.0 digital technologies enhancing sustainability: applications and barriers from the agricultural industry in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 137208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137208.
  • Da Silveira, F., Da Silva, S. L. C., Machado, F. M., Barbedo, J. G. A., & Amaral, F. G. (2023a). Farmers’ perception of the barriers that hinder the implementation of agriculture 4.0. Agricultural Systems, 208, 103656. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103656.
  • Da Silveira, F., Barbedo, J. G. A., da Silva, S. L. C., & Amaral, F. G. (2023b). Proposal for a framework to manage the barriers that hinder the development of agriculture 4.0 in the agricultural production chain. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 214, 108281. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108281.
  • Da Silveira, F., Lermen, F. H., & Amaral, F. G. (2021). An overview of agriculture 4.0 development: systematic review of descriptions, technologies, barriers, advantages, and disadvantages. Elsevier B.V., Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 189, 106405. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106405.
  • Deng, L., Zhang, H., Wang, C., Ma, W., Zhu, A., Zhang, F., & Jiao, X. (2021). Improving the sustainability of the wheat supply chain through multi-stakeholder engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321(2), 128837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128837.
  • Derakhti, A., Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. R., & Mardani, A. (2023). Industry 4.0 and beyond: a review of the literature on the challenges and barriers facing the agri-food supply chain. Sustainability, 15(6), 5078. DOI: 10.3390/su15065078.
  • Dibbern, T., Romani, L. A. S., & Massruhá, S. M. F. S. (2024). Main drivers and barriers to the adoption of digital agriculture technologies. Smart Agricultural Technology, 8, 100459. DOI: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100459.
  • Dora, M., Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Pant, A., & Kamal, M. M. (2022). Critical success factors influencing artificial intelligence adoption in food supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), 4621-4640. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1959665.
  • Dos Santos Silva, J., Matos de Oliveira, A., Veríssimo de Oliveira, J., & Bouzon, M. (2024). Barriers to digital transformation in fruit and vegetable supply chains: a multicriteria analysis using ISM and MICMAC. OPSEARCH, 0123456789. DOI: 10.1007/s12597-024-00809-6.
  • Dündar, A. O., Peker, K., Tekin, M., Şahman, M. A., & Büber, M. (2016). A suggestion for a new e-governance system in the wheat supply chain management. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Electronics and Computers (Special Issue-1), 346-346. DOI: 10.18100/ijamec.277444.
  • Escribà-Gelonch, M., Liang, S., van Schalkwyk, P., Fisk, I., Long, N. V. D., & Hessel, V. (2024). Digital twins in agriculture: orchestration and applications. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72(19), 10737-10752. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c01934.
  • FAO (2021). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture – systems at breaking point (SOLAW 2021). DOI: 10.4060/cb7654en.
  • FAO (2024). World food and agriculture – statistical yearbook 2024. DOI: 10.4060/cd2971en.
  • Farooq, M. S., Ansari, Z. K., Alvi, A., Rustam, F., De La Torre Díez, I., Mazón, J. L. V., Rodríguez, C. L., & Ashraf, I. (2024). Blockchain based transparent and reliable framework for wheat crop supply chain. PLoS ONE, 19(1 January), 1-21. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295036.
  • Gholamian, M. R., & Taghanzadeh, A. H. (2017). Integrated network design of wheat supply chain: a real case of Iran. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 140, 139-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.038.
  • Guixia, X., Samian, N., Mohd Faizal, M. F., Mohd As’Ad, M. A. Z., Mohamad Fadzil, M. F., Abdullah, A., Seah, W. K. G., Ishak, M., & Hermadi, I. (2024). A Framework for blockchain and internet of things integration in improving food security in the food supply chain. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 34(1), 24–37. DOI: 10.37934/araset.34.1.2437.
  • Gupta, M., & Kumar, R. (2023). Modeling Cloud Computing adoption barriers for Indian SMEs’ supply chain using TISM and MICMAC analysis. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 14(1), 29-55. DOI: 10.1504/ijbpscm.2023.10048490.
  • Hedayati, E., Zeinalnezhad, M., & Samiallah, S. (2024). Identify and rank barriers to the use of blockchain technology in the sustainable supply chain of the food industry. Supply Chain Management, 26(82), 17-42. DOR: 1001.1.20089198.1403.26.82.2.9. [In Persian]
  • Heydari, N., & Taran, F. (2025). Investigating the status of virtual water of irrigated wheat and providing technical and policy solutions for its improvement in Iran. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 25, 15-34. DOI: 10.22092/idser.2025.367448.1596. [In Persian]
  • Jararweh, Y., Fatima, S., Jarrah, M., & AlZu’bi, S. (2023). Smart and sustainable agriculture: fundamentals, enabling technologies, and future directions. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 110, 108799. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108799.
  • Khan, S., Kaushik, M. K., Kumar, R., & Khan, W. (2023). Investigating the barriers of blockchain technology integrated food supply chain: a BWM approach. Benchmarking, 30(3), 713-735. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0489.
  • Khebbache, R., Merizig, A., Rezeg, K., & Lloret, J. (2023). The recent technological trends of smart irrigation systems in smart farming: a review. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 14(1), 10317-10335. Available at https://journal.uob.edu.bh/handle/123456789/5127.
  • Kukk, M., Põder, A., & Viira, A.-H. (2022). The role of public policies in the digitalisation of the agri-food sector: a systematic review. NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences, 94(1), 217-248. DOI: 10.1080/27685241.2022.2147870.
  • Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2022a). Barriers for adoption of Industry 4.0 in sustainable food supply chain: a circular economy perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 73(2), 385-411. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0695.
  • Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Agrawal, N., Cheikhrouhou, N., Sharma, M., & Daim, T. (2022b). Integrated blockchain and internet of things in the food supply chain: adoption barriers. Technovation, 118, 102589. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102589.
  • Lahane, S., Paliwal, V., & Kant, R. (2023). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to overcome the barriers of Industry 4.0 enabled sustainable food supply chain adoption. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 8, 100116. DOI: 10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100116.
  • Langridge, P., Alaux, M., Almeida, N. F., Ammar, K., Baum, M., Bekkaoui, F., Bentley, A. R., Beres, B. L., Berger, B., Braun, H. J., Brown-Guedira, G., Burt, C. J., Caccamo, M. J., Cattivelli, L., Charmet, G., Civáň, P., Cloutier, S., Cohan, J. P., Devaux, P. J., … Zhang, X. (2022). Meeting the challenges facing wheat production: the strategic research agenda of the global wheat initiative. Agronomy, 12(11), 1–17. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12112767.
  • Lezoche, M., Hernandez, J., Alemany, M., Panetto, H., & Kacprzyk, J. (2020). Agri-food 4.0: a survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Computers in Industry, 117(103187), 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187.
  • Limpamont, A., Kittipanya-ngam, P., Chindasombatcharoen, N., & Cavite, H. J. M. (2024). Towards agri-food industry sustainability: addressing agricultural technology adoption challenges through innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 7352-7367. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3871.
  • Manning, L., Brewer, S., Craigon, P. J., Frey, J., Gutierrez, A., Jacobs, N., Kanza, S., Munday, S., Sacks, J., & Pearson, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and ethics within the food sector: developing a common language for technology adoption across the supply chain. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 125, 33-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.025.
  • Menon, S., & Jain, K. (2024). Blockchain technology for transparency in agri-food supply chain: use cases, limitations, and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 106-120. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3110903.
  • Mohammed, A., Potdar, V., Quaddus, M., & Hui, W. (2023). Blockchain adoption in food supply chains: a systematic literature review on enablers, benefits, and barriers. IEEE Access, 11, 14236-14255. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236666.
  • Moshayedi, A. J., Sohail Khan, A., Yang, Y., Hu, J., & Kolahdooz, A. (2024). Robots in agriculture: revolutionizing farming practices. EAI Endorsed Transactions on AI and Robotics, 3, 1-23. DOI: 10.4108/airo.5855.
  • Motevalli-Taher, F., Paydar, M. M., & Emami, S. (2020). Wheat sustainable supply chain network design with forecasted demand by simulation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 178(June), 105763. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105763.
  • Mowla, M. N., Mowla, N., Shah, A. F. M. S., Rabie, K. M., & Shongwe, T. (2023). Internet of things and wireless sensor networks for smart agriculture applications: a survey. IEEE Access, 11, 145813-145852. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3346299.
  • Narwane, V. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gardas, B. B. (2022). Unlocking adoption challenges of IoT in Indian agricultural and food supply chain. Smart Agricultural Technology, 2, 100035. DOI: 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100035.
  • Nayal, K., Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B. E., Priyadarshinee, P., Panchal, G. B., & Gedam, V. V. (2023). Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 327(1), 293-337. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04423-3.
  • Nisar, U., Zhang, Z., Wood, B. P., Ahmad, S., Ellahi, E., Ul Haq, S. I., Alnafissa, M., & Fathi Abd-Allah, E. (2024). Unlocking the potential of blockchain technology in enhancing the fisheries supply chain: an exploration of critical adoption barriers in China. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59167-4.
  • Nouri, M., Homaee, M., Pereira, L. S., & Bybordi, M. (2023). Water management dilemma in the agricultural sector of Iran: a review focusing on water governance. Agricultural Water Management, 288, 108480. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108480.
  • Nurgazina, J., Pakdeetrakulwong, U., Moser, T., & Reiner, G. (2021). Distributed ledger technology applications in food supply chains:a review of challenges and future research directions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8), 4206. DOI: 10.3390/su13084206.
  • Ocampo, L. (2022). Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) and weighted sum under fuzzy information for evaluating the sustainability of farm tourism sites. Soft Computing, 26(22), 12481-12508. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07184-8.
  • OECD/FAO (2024). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2024-2033. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). DOI: 10.1787/4c5d2cfb-en.
  • Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Symmetry, 10(9), 1-22. DOI: 10.3390/sym10090393.
  • Pedersen, S. M., Erekalo, K. T., Christensen, T., Denver, S., Gemtou, M., Fountas, S., Isakhanyan, G., Rosemarin, A., Ekane, N., Puggaard, L. L., Nertinger, M., Brinks, H., Puško, D., & Adrián, J. B. (2024). Drivers and barriers to climate-smart agricultural practices and technologies adoption: insights from stakeholders of five European food supply chains. Smart Agricultural Technology, 8, 100478. DOI: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100478.
  • Pelé, P., Schulze, J., Piramuthu, S., & Zhou, W. (2023). IoT and blockchain based framework for logistics in food supply chains. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(5), 1743–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10343-9
  • Purcell, W., Neubauer, T., & Mallinger, K. (2023). Digital twins in agriculture: challenges and opportunities for environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 61, 101252. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101252.
  • Rajabzadeh, M., Elahi, Sh., Hassanzadeh, A., & Mehraiin, M. (2021). Mapping factors affecting IoT deployment in storage sector of wheat supply chain. Industrial Management Studies, 19(60), 121-144. DOI: 10.22054/jims.2021.54482.2528. [In Persian]
  • Rathore, S., Gupta, N., & Rathore, A. S. (2022). Blockchain-based smart wheat supply chain model in Indian context. Advanced Series in Management, 27, 77-96. DOI: 10.1108/S1877-636120220000027006.
  • Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C. A. (2021). Agriculture 4.0: making it work for people, production, and the planet. Land Use Policy, 100, 104933. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933.
  • Saha, A., Raut, R., & Kumar, M. (2025). Digital technology adoption challenges in the agri-food supply chain from the perspective of attaining sustainable development goals. International Journal of Logistics Management, 36(2), 556-588. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-09-2023-0412.
  • Salehnia, M. (2023). Economic impacts of climate change on selected strategic crops in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 30(3), 175-205. DOI: 10.30490/AEAD.2023.356916.1403. [In Persian]
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
  • Schmidt, D., Casagranda, L. F., Butturi, M. A., & Sellitto, M. A. (2024). Digital technologies, sustainability, and efficiency in grain post-harvest activities: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(3), 1244. DOI: 10.3390/su16031244.
  • Sehgal, S., Singh, B., & Sharma, V. (2022). Smart and sustainable food technologies. Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-1746-2.
  • Sezer, M. D., Kazancoglu, Y., Mangla, S. K., & Lafçı, Ç. (2024). Smart, sustainable, and resilient food supply chains in disruptive events context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6156-6171. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3801.
  • Shahmoradi, M., & Varamziyari, H. (2025). National strategic document and action plan for digital agriculture: necessities and components (Report No. 20431). Monthly Expert Reports of the Islamic Parliament Research Center, 32(11), Article 20431. DOI: 10.22034/report.mrc.2025.1403.32.11.20431. [In Persian]
  • Shepherd, M., Turner, J. A., Small, B., & Wheeler, D. (2020). Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the ‘digital agriculture’ revolution. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(14), 5083-5092. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9346.
  • Sonar, H., Sharma, I., Ghag, N., & Raje, B. (2024). Harvesting sustainability: assessing Industry 4.0 in agri-food supply chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 36(2), 647-668. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-10-2023-0443.
  • Sullivan, C. S., Gemtou, M., Anastasiou, E., & Fountas, S. (2024). Building trust: a systematic review of the drivers and barriers of agricultural data sharing. Smart Agricultural Technology, 8, 100477. DOI: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100477.
  • Toader, D. C., Rădulescu, C. M., & Toader, C. (2024). Investigating the adoption of blockchain technology in agri-food supply chains: analysis of an extended UTAUT model. Agriculture (Switzerland), 14(4), 614. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14040614.
  • Tripathi, S., & Gupta, M. (2020). Transforming towards a smarter supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 36(3), 319-342. DOI: 10.1504/ijlsm.2020.10019293.
  • UN (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: our common future. United Nations (UN). Available at https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811.
  • UN (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations (UN). Available at https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/70/1.
  • Vaezi, R., Aslipour, H., Zarandi, S., & Shams, L. (2024). Identifying the challenges of providing the basic goods of wheat in the public service ecosystem. Studies in Public Service Administration, 2(3), 183-224. DOI: 10.22054/spsa.2023.74961.1025. [In Persian]
  • Vern, P., Panghal, A., Mor, R. S., Kamble, S. S., Islam, M. S., & Khan, S. A. R. (2023). Influential barriers to blockchain technology implementation in agri-food supply chain. Operations Management Research, 16(3), 1206-1219. DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00388-7.
  • Virmani, N., & Singh, R. K. (2024). Analysis of barriers for adopting blockchain in agri-food supply chain management: a decision support framework. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 41(8), 2122-2145. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-03-2023-0078.
  • Wang, W., Cao, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, C., Han, X., Zhou, B., & Wang, W. (2024). Assessing the adoption barriers for the AI in food supply chain finance applying a hybrid interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-ARAS model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79177-6.
  • Weerabahu, W. M. S. K., Samaranayake, P., Nakandala, D., & Hurriyet, H. (2022). Digital supply chain research trends: a systematic review and a maturity model for adoption. Benchmarking, 30(9), 3040-3066. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-12-2021-0782.
  • Yadav, V. S., & Majumdar, A. (2024). What impedes digital twin from revolutionizing agro-food supply chain? Analysis of barriers and strategy development for mitigation. Operations Management Research, 17(2), 711-727. DOI: 10.1007/s12063-024-00444-w.
  • Yadav, V. S., Singh, A. R., Gunasekaran, A., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. E. (2022). A systematic literature review of the agro-food supply chain: challenges, network design, and performance measurement perspectives. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 685-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.019.
  • Zhao, G., Ye, C., Dennehy, D., Liu, S., Harfouche, A., & Olan, F. (2024). Analysis of barriers to adopting Industry 4.0 to achieve agri-food supply chain sustainability: a group-based fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 8559-8586. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3928.
  • Zkik, K., Belhadi, A., Rehman Khan, S. A., Kamble, S. S., Oudani, M., & Touriki, F. E. (2023). Exploration of barriers and enablers of blockchain adoption for sustainable performance: implications for e-enabled agriculture supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 26(11), 1498-1535. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2022.2088707.