اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

بهره‌گیری از ظرفیت موافقت‌نامه‌های بین‌المللی در تأمین پایدار غلات و دانه‌های روغنی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار موسسه پژوهش‏‌های برنامه‏‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی
2 کارشناس ارشد و معاون دبیرخانه شورای قیمت‌‏گذاری و اتخاذ سیاست‏‌های حمایتی محصولات اساسی کشاورزی
3 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد بین الملل و رئیس کمیته سیاست تجاری دبیرخانه شورای قیمت‌گذاری و اتخاذ سیاست‌های حمایتی محصولات اساسی کشاورزی
چکیده
بسیاری از کشورها، به‏‌ویژه کشورهای در حال توسعه، برای دستیابی به بازارهای هدف ایمن‌تر و کاهش موانع تجاری، سعی در بهره‌گیری از توافق‌نامه‌های تجاری دارند. بخشی قابل توجه از نیازهای داخلی ایران به غلات و دانه‌های روغنی، به‏‌عنوان مهم‌ترین کالاهای اساسی بخش کشاورزی، از طریق واردات تأمین می‌شود. در پژوهش حاضر، با استفاده از الگوی کاربردی اسمارت، تجارت غلات و دانه‌های روغنی ایران با پنج کشور عضو اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا در دوره زمانی 1402-1395 و همچنین، پیامدهای ایجاد تجارت و انحراف تجارت غلات و دانه‌های روغنی ناشی از موافقت‌نامه موقت ایران و اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا بررسی و تحلیل شد. نتایج بررسی نشان داد که تجارت غلات و دانه‌های روغنی بین ایران و پنج کشور اتحادیه طی چهار سال پس از اجرای موافقت‌نامه، در مقایسه با میانگین سه سال قبل از اجرای آن، به‌‏طور نسبی بهبود یافته است. بر پایة نتایج کاربرد الگوی اسمارت، واردات غلات و دانه‌های روغنی، روغن خام و کنجاله از این اتحادیه، به‏دلیل کاهش تعرفه، افزایش 13/6 درصدی داشته، که بخشی از آن ناشی از ایجاد تجارت و بخش دیگر ناشی از انحراف تجارت بوده است. بنابراین، استفاده از سازوکار موافقت‌نامه‌های بین‌المللی در دیپلماسی اقتصادی کشور می‌تواند در شرایط تحریم، در تأمین کالای اساسی مورد نیاز و بهبود امنیت غذایی کشور مؤثر واقع شود. از این‌‏رو، پیشنهاد می‌شود که به‏‌منظور تأمین پایدار کالاهای اساسی، تدوین راهبرد‌های میان‌مدت برای بهره‎‌گیری از موافقت‌نامه‌های بین‌المللی در دستور کار دولت قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Utilizing the Potential of International Agreements in the Sustainable Supply of Grains and Oilseeds

نویسندگان English

mehdi kazemnejad 1
Leila Azizi 2
Seyede Zohre Hoseini Amin 3
1 Associate Professor and Faculty Member of Agricultural Planning, Economics and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI)
2 Senior expert and deputy of the secretariat of pricing council and adoption of support policies for basic agricultural
3 Phd Student of international economics and Head of the Trade Policy Committee of the Secretariat of the Council for Pricing and Adopting Supportive Policies for Essential Agricultural Products
چکیده English

Introduction: In today's world, no country can meet all the needs of its society without relying on the products and services of other countries. Even if such a capability exists in a country, it is not economically rational and cost-effective. On the other hand, agricultural products are one of the most important sources of meeting human nutritional needs. Meanwhile, globalization has led to the rapid growth of trade at the global level and the reduction of information and communication costs. In this context, the food market in developing countries has undergone fundamental changes due to rapid urbanization, increased food diversity, trade convergence, and liberalization of foreign direct investment in the food industry. One of the most important changes in the global trading system during this period is the increase in Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs). The domestic market needs are met through domestic production and imports. Several factors, including government policies, international conditions, and world prices, affect the process of supplying products. Given the frequent droughts and climate change, Iran needs to supply part of its agricultural products through imports, taking advantage of the capacities of preferential agreements such as the Iran-Eurasia Agreement (IEA). This study aimed at examining the use of economic opportunities arising from IEA in the field of grain and oilseed trade with the member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). This agreement was signed between Iran and EEU on May 17, 2018, after two years of negotiations. The main question of this research was as follows: What was the effect of IEA’s Trade Creation (TC) and Trade Deviation (TD) on grain and oilseed imports after its implementation? A review of past studies indicated that these studies had analyzed various agreements and their effects on the development of trade in EEU member countries using various methods such as [1]. Software on Market Analysis and Restriction on Trade (SMART) and Gravity models. However, the significant difference of this study from other research is that it is the first to examine the effects of IEA after its implementation compared to before, using the SMART model for some basic products.
Materials and Methods: In this paper, using a partial equilibrium model called SMART Simulation Model, the effects of tariff reduction on Iran’s trade flow in agricultural trade with EEU member countries in the form of concepts of TC and TD were investigated. In the next step, the effects of tariffs on agricultural commodity groups at the classification level of Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) were analyzed. The statistical population of this study included EEU and Iran. Data on the total value of bilateral trade (exports and imports) between Iran and the Union between 2016-2023 were based on information from Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA) for 2017 to 2022 were extracted from the International Trade Center (ITC) website. Also, Iran’s tariff statistics were obtained from the book of export and import regulations for 2016-2023.
Results and Discussion: A statistical study showed that the value of Iran’s agricultural exports to the world had decreased by 11 percent between 2016 and 2023. In contrast, the average agricultural exports to EEU in the four years after the agreement was ratified increased by a significant 96 percent compared to the three years before. The value of agricultural imports from EEU also decreased by 7.6 percent during the period under study after the implementation of the agreement. This information indicated that since 2019 and after the implementation of the IEA, Iran’s trade with the union has had increased significantly and experienced significant growth. The TC and TD consequences on the import side of the aforementioned products from the Eurasian Union resulting from the tariff reduction were estimated to be $31 million in TC and $25.8 million in TD. Therefore, the total estimated increase in imports of the aforementioned products from the Union compared to their average imports during the four years following the implementation of the agreement (2019-2023) would be equal to $56.8 million, which would be a 13.4 percent increase in imports from the Union. In other words, the volume of trade has improved.
Conclusion and Suggestions: In line with the increasing trend of EEU share of world grain trade, the average share of wheat, barley and maize production in the studied period has varied from 1.5 percent for maize to 16.6 percent for barley. Therefore, the effects of the agreement on trade synergies between the Union and its partners and the world are very significant. In contrast, in the area of ​​oilseeds, this trend has been decreasing for the Union during the concerned period. The results of the SMART model indicated that the Trade Creation (TC) and Trade Deviation (TD) effects resulting from the implementation of the agreement were equal to $31 and $25.8 million, respectively, representing a total increase of $56.8 million in imports (13.4 percent) from this union compared to their average imports during the four years following the implementation of the agreement (2019-2023). Therefore, all numerical indicators in the goods covered by the agreement indicated its positive effects on the trade of Iran. According to the obtained results, the following points are recommended: 1) The government should put on its agenda the development of a medium-term strategy for taking advantage of international agreements; 2) It is necessary to take more serious measures to maximize the capacity of the Iran-Eurasia Memorandum of Understanding in supplying basic goods; 3) It is necessary to pay more attention to the issue of guiding businessmen and economic activists in utilizing the capacities of the Iran-Eurasia Agreement (IEA) in order to improve food security by using timely information and short-term and practical training; 4) Incentive and guiding approaches should be applied in implementing the ‘oilseed import policy subject to domestic purchase’ to further utilize the capacity of IEA; and 5) The diversity of import sources of agricultural products should be increased by utilizing various international agreements to supply basic products which seems necessary to be placed on the agenda of Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ) of Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Cereals
Oilseeds
Trade Agreement
Iran-Eurasian
SMART Model
  • Azad, G. (2000). Development economics. Nei Publication, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Bhagwati, J. & Panagaria, A. (1996). The theory of preferential trade agreements: historical evolution and current trends. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 22-40.
  • Bhagwati, J. (1971). Trade diverting Customs Union and welfare improvement: clarification. Economic Journal, 81(323), 28-51.
  • Chandran, S. (2011). Trade complementarity and similarity between india and asean countries in the context of the RTA (February 17, 2011). DOI: 2139/ssrn.1763299.
  • Chandran, B.P. Sarath (2011), Trade Compelementarity and Ssimilarity between India and ASEAN Countries in the Context of the RTA, Goa: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  • Cooper, C. A. & Massell, B. F. (1965). Toward a general theory of Customs Unions for developing countries. Journal of Political Economy, 73(5), 256-283.
  • De Castro, T. (2012). Trade cooperation indicators:development of BRIC bilateral trade Flows. International Review of Business Research Papers, 8(1), 211-223.
  • FAO (2024). Production trend of wheat, barley, corn and oilseeds (soybean, sunflower and rapeseed). Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Available at www.fao.org/faostat/.
  • Ghosh, J., Havlik, P., Ribiero, M. p., & Urban, W. (2009). Models of BRIC Economic Development and challenges for EU competitiveness. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
  • Hosseini, M., & Zahedtalaban, A. (2006). Quantitative assessment of Iran-EU trade and cooperation agreement on Iran’s foreign trade development. Journal of Trade Studies (JTS), 10(41), 27-52 . [In Persian]
  • IRICA (2022). Customs import and export statistics of IRI Customs Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA), Tehran, Iran. Available at https://www.irica.ir. [In Parsian]
  • ITC (2024). ITC Trade map. International Trade Center (ITC). Available at https://www.trademap.org.
  • Jachia, L. & Teljeur, E. (1998). Free trade between South Africa and the European Union: a quantitative analysis. UNCTAD Discussion Papers141, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  • Kazemnejad, M., Azizi, L., & Hosseini Amin, S. Z. (2021). Impact of the interim agreement between Iran and the Eurasian Economic Union in the development of trade between these countries. Agricultural Economics, 15(60), 61-93. DOI: 10.22034/iaes.2021.538892.1868. [In Persian]
  • Khorana, , Kimbugwe, K., & Perdikis, N. (2007), Regional integration under the East African community: an assessment of the trade and welfare effects for Uganda. The International Conference on Policy Modeling, Sao Paulo, 11-13 July.
  • Kim, S. J. (2013). Trade complementarity between South Korea and her major trading countries: its changes over the period of 2005-2009. World Review of Business Research, 3(2), 64-83.
  • Koochaki, A., Yazdi Samadi, B., Mazaheri, D., Valizadeh, R., Rezaei, A., & Vojdani, P. (2007). Food security and crop production in Iran. Nameh Farhangistan (Letter of Academy), 3, 177-237. [In Persian]
  • Krungman, P. (1991). The move toward Free Trade Zones in policy implications of trade and Currency Zones. Article Provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in Its Journal Economic Review, pp. 5-25.
  • Lipsey, R. G. (1957). The theory of Customs Unions: trade diversion and welfare. Economica, 24(93), 40-46.
  • Lipsey, R. G. (1970). The theory of Customs Unions: a general equilibrium analysis, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.
  • MAJ (2024). Agricultural statistics from different years. Ministry of Agriculturae-Jahad (MAJ), Deputy for Planning and Economy, Center for Statistics, Information and Communication Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  • Manteghi, N., & Taghavi, M. (2008). Investigating the effect of the preferential trade agreement on the development of foreign trade using the SMART model (case study of Iran, Turkey and Pakistan). Economics Research, 8(29), 181-204. [In Persian]
  • Mehrabi, l. (2007). Investigating the effects of establishing a preferential trade arrangement agreement between Iran and Central Asian countries. Journal of Trade Studies (JTS), 11(44), 101-129. [In Persian]
  • Mehrparvar Hosseini, E., Rafiee, H., Rostamzadeh, Z., & Aminizadeh, M. (2023). The effect of membership in trade agreements on Iran’s agricultural bilateral trade balance. Agricultural Economics Research, 15(4), 93-107. DOI: 10.30495/jae.2023.28591.2273. [In Persian]
  • Mohammadi, H., Saghaian, S. M., Aghasafari, H., & Aminizadeh, M. (2018). Assessing the effective factors on agricultural intra-industry trade between Iran and Asian trading partners. Agricultural Economics, 12(3), 133-151. DOI: 10.22034/iaes.2018.62046.1442. [In Persian]
  • Naseri, M. (2008). Calculating the competitiveness of industrial activities in order to prepare a table of tariff concessions in the negotiations for accession to the World Trade Organization. Deputy Minister of International Affairs, Ministry of Commerce. [In Persian]
  • Sagheb, H., & Ghanbari, M. (2006). The effects of imposition of preferential tariffs among D8 members on Iran’s agricultural trade. Agricultural Economics and Development, 14(55), 91-120. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2006.58909. [In Persian]
  • Sagheb, H., & Sadeghi Yarandi, S. (2006). Study of the effects of the bilateral trade agreement between Iran and Pakistan: using smart model Journal of Trade Studies (JTS), 10(38). 259-294. [In Persian]
  • Sepanlou, H. & Ghanbari, A. (2011). Investigation of factors affecting Iran’s import demand by intermediate, capital and consumer goods separately. Journal of Trade Studies (JTS) Quarterly, 57, 209-233. [In Persian]
  • Sheffield, S. (1998). Agriculture, GATT, and regional trade agreement. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC.
  • Summers, L. (2005). Regionalism and the world trading system. In: Policy implications of trade and currency zones: a summary of the Bank’s 1991 Symposium. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, November/December, 2005, Kansas City, MO.
  • Veeramani, C., & Saini, G. K. (2010). Impact of ASEAN-India FTA on India’s plantation commodities: a simulation analysis. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai. Available at https://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2010-004.pdf.
  • Viner, J. (1950) The Customs Union issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York.
  • Wonnacott, P. & Lutz, M. (1989). Is there a case for free trade areas? In: Schott, J. (ed.) Free trade areas and U.S. trade policy. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, pp 59-84.
  • Wonnacott، P. & Wonnacott, R. G. (1981). Is unilateral tariff reduction preferable to a Customs Union? The curious case of missing foreign tariffs. The American Economic Review, 71(4), 69-92.