اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

تحلیلی بر نابرابری فضایی توسعه کشاورزی مناطق روستایی منطقه سیستان و عوامل مؤثر بر آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، پژوهشگر مؤسسه پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، تهران، ایران.
2 دکتری برنامه‌‏ریزی راهبردی کشاورزی و امنیت غذایی، قائم مقام مؤسسه پژوهش‏‌های برنامه‏‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، سرپرست معاونت امور پژوهشی این مؤسسه، تهران، ایران.
3 دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، پژوهشگر مؤسسه پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
طی سال­‌های اخیر، مطالعه نابرابری و وجود آن در محدوده‌­های جغرافیایی مختلف به‌‏ویژه در کانون توجه برنامه‌­ریزان و سیاست‏گذاران بوده است. با توجه به موقعیت جغرافیایی و ویژگی‌های زیست‏‌شناختی منحصربه‏‌فرد استان‌های کشور، نابرابری فضایی در حوزه کشاورزی در ایران، هم در سطح درون‌منطقه‌ای و هم در سطح بین‌منطقه‌ای، به‌طور گسترده مشاهده می‌شود. در این میان، منطقه سیستان از اهمیت ویژه برخوردار است، زیرا الگوهای توسعه کشاورزی به‏ویژه در نواحی روستایی این منطقه به‌‏گونه‌‏ای متفاوت شکل گرفته‌اند، که منجر به ایجاد شکاف‌های قابل توجه در بهره‌وری، دسترسی به منابع و فرصت‌های اقتصادی شده است. بنابراین، پرداختن به موضوع نابرابری فضایی در بخش کشاورزی روستاهای این منطقه بسیار اهمیت دارد. بر این اساس، پژوهش حاضر، با هدف تحلیل نابرابری فضایی در توسعه کشاورزی روستاهای منطقه سیستان و بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر آن، از نوع کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش، توصیفی- تحلیلی و اکتشافی بود؛ و نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که توسعه کشاورزی در روستاهای منطقه سیستان در وضعیت نامطلوب قرار دارد. بر اساس یافته‌­های بخش کیفی پژوهش، عوامل علی نابرابری فضایی در توسعه کشاورزی نواحی روستایی منطقه سیستان عبارت‏‌اند از تغییرات اقلیمی، جایگاه نامشخص عدالت فضایی در نظام اداری و اجرایی، رویکرد متمرکز، نگاه بخشی و تک‌بعدی به توسعه؛ همچنین، عدم توجه به قابلیت‌­های فیزیکی- محیطی موجود در روستاهای منطقه سیستان، توزیع نامتوازن زیرساخت‌­ها و خدمات کشاورزی در سیاست‌گذاری‌های منطقه‌­ای، حکمروایی نامطلوب روستایی، عدم مشارکت مردم در فرآیند توسعه کشاورزی و نبود سازوکارهای مقابله با پدیده خشکسالی به‏‌عنوان عوامل زمین‌ه­ای نابرابری فضایی شناسایی شدند. علاوه بر این، بر اساس نتایج مطالعه، عوامل مداخله­‌گر مؤثر در نابرابری­‌های فضایی توسعه کشاورزی در روستاهای منطقه سیستان شامل عدم تسریع انتقال آب به سیستان، سیاسی‌کاری در مسئله تقسیم آب رودخانه هیرمند بین ایران و افغانستان، اتخاذ سیاست قطبی، مدیریت نامنسجم در بین سازمان­‌ها، عدم حمایت مؤثر نظام بانکی از بخش کشاورزی روستاهای سیستان و ناکارآمدی اسناد بالادستی در زمینه توسعه متوازن و محرومیت‌­زدایی ارزیابی شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

An Analysis of Spatial Inequality in Agricultural Development of Rural Areas in Sistan Region and Its Influencing Factors

نویسندگان English

Ashraf Sajadi 1
Mojtaba Palouj 2
Hossein Esmaeilnia 3
1 PhD in Geography and Rural Planning, Kharazmi University, Researcher at Agricultural Planning, Economics and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI), Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD in Agricultural Strategic Planning and Food Security, Deputy Director of Agricultural Planning, Economics and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI), Head of the Vice President for Research Affairs at APERDRI, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD in Geography and Rural Planning, Researcher at the Institute for Planning Research, Agricultural Economics and Rural Development. Tehran. Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Despite the significant potential in the agricultural sector, particularly in tropical crop production in Sistan region of Iran, spatial policies and the distribution of government activities and services in agriculture and natural resources have not been aligned with comparative advantages and climatic conditions, especially for essential products. This deficiency has led to the neglect of the actual potential of rural areas in this region for production, preventing adequate growth in their agricultural sector. Furthermore, the development of complementary services and infrastructure for agricultural development in these rural areas has not been proportional to their agricultural production potential. As a result, the rural areas with high potential comparative advantages have been marginalized and excluded from agricultural development management decision-making. Agricultural development plays a key role in various aspects such as achieving economic and political independence, self-sufficiency in strategic products, creating employment for the growing population, supplying raw materials for industry, regional balance and equilibrium, rural development, regulating urban-rural relations, limiting uncontrolled migration to cities, and ensuring food security for national development. Therefore, identifying and analyzing the current agricultural situation is one of the most important issues in regional planning for the Sistan region. Achieving this goal requires a thorough analysis of the status of the Sistan rural areas. It should also be noted that since one of the objectives of the rural planning is to achieve economic and social development at the rural level, with agricultural development always being a priority, assessing the agricultural development along with identifying causal, contextual, and intervening factors contributing to spatial inequality is a crucial step for planners to achieve the development goals. Accordingly, this research aimed to investigate and respond to the following questions:

What combination of causal, contextual, and intervening factors has contributed to spatial inequality in agricultural development?
How can agricultural planning be improved to leverage the region’s comparative advantages?
What policy measures are needed to integrate marginalized rural areas into agricultural development decision-making?

Materials and Methods: This was an applied study in terms of purpose while it could be considered as descriptive-analytical exploratory research in terms of nature and methodology. The research data was collected through documented-desk studies (literature review) as well as questionnaires and interviews. The required information and data were organized in two phases: quantitative and qualitative. For data analysis in the quantitative phase, SPSS software was used, while in the qualitative phase, grounded theory and Delphi method were employed. It is worth noting that the statistical population of the study was different for the two quantitative and qualitative stages. In the quantitative stage, the statistical population included all rural households in the Sistan region, which according to the information of the Statistical Center of Iran (SCI) in 2016, numbered 60,075 households in 796 rural locations. The sample size was determined using Cochran formula and at a confidence level of 95 percent, equal to 321 households, which were randomly selected to respond the questionnaire. In the qualitative stage, the statistical population of study included specialists in the fields of geography and rural planning, agriculture, and land use planning, of which 30 individuals were selected using purposive sampling.
Results and Discussion: The study findings indicated that the agricultural development in the rural areas of Sistan region was in an unfavorable state. Based on the qualitative research findings, the causal factors of spatial inequality in the agricultural development in rural areas of the region included climate change, the undefined position of spatial justice in the administrative and executive system, centralized and sectoral approaches, and a one-dimensional perspective on development. Also, lack of attention to the physical-environmental capabilities available in the rural areas of Sistan region, unbalanced distribution of infrastructure and agricultural services in regional policies, unfavorable rural governance, lack of public participation in the agricultural development process, and lack of mechanisms to deal with drought were identified as underlying factors of the spatial inequality. In addition, based on the results of the study, the intervening factors affecting the spatial inequalities of agricultural development in the rural areas of Sistan region included the failure to accelerate the transfer of water to the Sistan region, the politicization of the issue of sharing the water of the Helmand River between Iran and Afghanistan, the adoption of polar policies, inconsistent management among organizations, lack of effective support from the banking system for the rural agricultural sector of Sistan, and the inefficiency of upstream documents were foung to be the main factors in the field of balanced development and elimination of deprivation.
Conclusion and Suggestions: To prevent the wasting of the capacities and capabilities of the Sistan rural areas, to make optimal use of them, and to eliminate agricultural imbalances, the need for the presence of a land use planning program in the planning of the agricultural sector in the Sistan region is evident. This approach in the discussions related to agricultural development is one of the basic areas of applied geography, which often organizes and establishes a balance in agricultural indicators in the region with demand and authority. Therefore, it is necessary to look into the future of Sistan agricultural space by understanding the current situation in the agricultural development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Spatial Inequality
Agricultural Development
Rural Areas
Sistan (Region)
  • Abdollahzadeh, Gh., & Sharifzadeh, A. (2012). Classifying regional development in Iran (application of composite index approach). (University of Isfahan), Urban-Regional Studies and Research, 4(13), 41-62. [In Persian]
  • Afrakhteh, H., Hajipour, M., Gourzin, M., & Nejati, B. (2013). The situation of sustainable agricultural development in Iran development plans, case: five-year plans after the revolution. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 1(1), 43-62. [In Persian]
  • Ahangari, A., & Saadat Mehr, M. (2007). Comparative study of development level of Lorestan counties according to their economic and social sectors. Knowledge and Development, 21, 159-194. [In Persian]
  • Azami, M., & Vahdat Moaddab, H. (2021). Analysis of the geographical gap of agricultural development indicators in Hamadan province. Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas, 2(4), 115-132. [In Persian]
  • Binswanger, H. P. (2001). Income distribution effect of technical change: some analytical issues. South East Asian Economic Review, 1(3), 179-218.
  • Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Chivu, L., Andrei, J. V., Zaharia, M., Gogonea, R. M. (2020). A regional agricultural efficiency convergence assessment in Romania: appraising differences and understanding potentials. Land Use Policy, Elsevier, 99, 154-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104838.
  • Ebrahimi, M. S. (2013). Rural development management. Amookhteh Publications, Isfahan. [In Persian]
  • Ebrahimi, M. S., Asadikhoob, M., & Khatounabadi, S. A. (2020). Spatial analysis of agricultural development in Behbahan. Village and Space Sustainable Development1(2), 41-60. DOI: 10.22077/vssd.2020.3784.1008. [In Persian]
  • FAO (2010). What is meant by the term “sustainability”? Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy. Available at https://www.fao.org/4/ai388e/AI388E05.htm.
  • Ghaderi, N., Shams, A., Ahadnejad Reveshty, M., & Hooshmandan Moghaddam Fard, Z. (2016). Measuring and analyzing agricultural development of sub-districts in paveh township using Vikor method. Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(1), 81-109. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2016.59023. [In Persian]
  • Haroon, J. (2016). Spatial disparities in socioeconomic development: the case of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 55(4), 421-435. DOI: 30541/v55i4I-IIpp.421-435.
  • Hosseini, s. A., Mirehei, M., Nazari, B. B., Hosseini, S. M. (2020). Analysis of spatial disparities in regional development in Iran (case studies: cities of the north coastal regions). Geographical Engineering of Territory, 3(6), 79-92. [In Persian]
  • Haughton, G., & Counsell, D. (2004). Regions, spatial strategies and sustainable development.
  • Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. J. (2005). Rising spatial disparities and development. Policy Brief, No. 3. UN University.
  • Klaus, D., Dávid, K. N., & Esteban, R. H. (2016). The geography of development. Journal of Political Economy, 126(3), 903-983. DOI: 10.1086/697084?journalCode=jpe.
  • Mikaniki, J., Sadeghi, H. A., & Fadayi, M. (2015). The evaluation and environmental assessment, appropriate pattern in order to recognition regional of capabilities with emphasis on agriculture (case study: cultivation of saffron in Qaenat and Zirkooh counties. Regional Planning, 5(19), 43-56. [In Persian]
  • Mosayyebzadeh, A., Mozaffarinia, A., & Shabestar, M. (2021). An analysis of spatial inequalities and assessment of the state of regional development in the provinces of Iran. Geography and Environmental Studies, 10(40), 71-84. DOR: 20.1001.1.20087845.1400.10.40.5. [In Persian]
  • Motiei Langaroudi, S. H., & Shamsaei, E. (2007). Rural area based on the continuity and sustainability of agriculture: a case study of Sejasroud district of Zanjan. Geographical Research, 2, 85-104 . [In Persian]
  • Mullayi Hashjin, N., & Mullaee Pardeh, S. (2014). Spatial analysis regarding agricultural development in Khuzestan’s counties. Space Economy and Rural Development, 3(8), 19-38. Available at http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2011-en.html. [In Persian]
  • Raman, R., & Kumari, R. (2012). Regional disparity in agricultural development: a district level analysis for Uttar Pradesh. Regional Development and Planning, 1(2), 71-90.
  • Rokneddin Eftekhari, A. R., Pourtahari, M., Farajzadeh, M., & Heydari Sarban, V. (2009). The role of empowerment in agricultural development, case study: Ardabil province. Human Geography Research, 69, 87-104. [In Persian]
  • Saeidirad, M., Esfaram, Y., Karami, F., & Ghourchi, M. (2020). Geographical gap analysis of agricultural development indicators in Lorestan province. Geographical Studies of Mountainous Regions, 1(1), 31-44. DOI: 10.29252/gsma.1.1.31. [In Persian]
  • Sarafi, M. (1998). Basics of regional development planning. Plan and Budget Organization (National Management and Planning Organization), Tehran. [In Persian]
  • SCI (2016). Population and Housing Census. Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), Tahran. [In Persian]
  • Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y. D. P., & Faria, A. S. (2004). An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18(1), 35-54. DOI: 1023/B:WARM.0000015348.88832.52.
  • Stringer, R. (2001). How important are the ‘non-traditional’ economic roles of agriculture in development? Adelaide University SA 5005, Center for International Economic Studies, Australia.
  • Tavakoli, M., Ebrahimi, A., & Hamidi Tehrani, S. (2018). Analysis of Iran spatial planning zoning pattern from Post-Constitutional Revolution till present. The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 22(1), 85-123. Available at  http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-25177-en.html. [In Persian]
  • Tizchang, M., & Azadeh, M. A. (2020). A meta-analysis of inequality in regional development programs. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 11(42), 1-39. DOI: 10.22054/qjsd.2020.11921. [In Persian]
  • Zheng, L., Shepherd, D., & Enowbi, B. M. (2021). Variations in the determinants of regional development disparities in rural China. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 29-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.011.