اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش کشاورزی هوشمند در مواجهه با تنوع اقلیمی: مطالعه موردی کشاورزان استان فارس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشیار گروه مدیریت کشاورزی، واحد گچساران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گچساران، ایران
چکیده
تغییرات آب‌وهوایی تهدیدی بزرگ و فزاینده، برای امنیت غذایی جهان است. دامنه و سرعت تغییرات آب‏‌وهوایی و اثرات سازگاری و تعدیلی آن در کشاورزی، برای بخش‌‏هایی بزرگ از جمعیت جهان در آینده، حیاتی و بحرانی خواهد بود. کشاورزی هوشمند، رویکردی برای هدایت مدیریت کشاورزی در عصر تغییر آب‏‌وهوایی است. پژوهش حاضر، با هدف شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش کشاورزی هوشمند در مواجهه با تنوع اقلیمی، جزو پژوهش‌‏‏های توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بوده، از لحاظ ماهیت، کمّی و از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی است. جامعة آماری پژوهش شامل کشاورزان استان فارس به تعداد 287456 نفر بود که بر اساس جدول مورگان، تعدد 384 نفر به ‏عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. برای انتخاب حجم نمونه، از روش نمونه‌‏گیری خوشه‌‏ای استفاده شد. ابزار مورد استفاده برای گردآوری‌ اطلاعات پرسشنامه بود که روایی آن از طریق پانل متخصصان و پایایی آن از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به‏ دست آمد. در بخش اول پرسشنامه، سؤالات مربوط به ویژگی‏‏‌های فردی پاسخ‏گویان و در بخش دوم، سؤالات تخصصی برای سنجش متغیر‏های تحقیق شامل 41 گویه بود که بر اساس طیف لیکرت پنج ‏گزین‏ه‌ای (خیلی کم= 1 تا خیلی زیاد= 5) تنظیم شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌‏‏ها، از نرم‌‏افزار‏های SPSS22 و Smart PLS2 استفاده شد. یافته‏‏‌های پژوهش نشان داد که عوامل اقتصادی،‌ اجتماعی، زراعی و فردی با پذیرش کشاورزی هوشمند در مواجهه با تنوع اقلیمی رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار دارند. بر همین اساس، پیشنهاد می‌شود که به‏ منظور ترویج کشاورزی هوشمند، علاوه بر تمرکز بر برنامه‌‏‏های آموزشی و ترویجی در راستای تغییر نگرش و رفتار کشاورزان، به ‏ویژه به مسائلی مانند وضعیت فرهنگی و اجتماعی گروه‌‏‏های هدف نیز توجه شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

dentifying Factors Affecting the Adoption of Smart Agriculture in the Face of Climate Variability: A Case Study of Farmers in Fars Province of Iran

نویسنده English

mohsen moosaei
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Management, Gachsaran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Climate change is one of the most important ecological problems of the 21st century, which has significant impacts on water resources, soil, floods and soil erosion. Thus, adopting appropriate measures to reduce the concerned damages requires assessing the impact of climate change and the effectiveness of adaptation options. The climate change affects all economic sectors to some extent and has widespread consequences on natural ecosystems and is a very important factor in intensifying the occurrence of dust, biodiversity loss, pest outbreaks in ecosystems, threatening the biological functions of wetlands and changing the natural geographical distribution of animals. Therefore, the issue of climate change and its consequences as a global problem requires further investigation. Smart agriculture is an emerging concept that refers to the management of agricultural land with Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IOT), and robotics. The goal of using smart agriculture is to improve the quantity and quality of products and reduce the human labor required during the production process. The smart agriculture provides farmers with various technologies such as sensors, software, robots, connections, positioning, and data analysis. In this way, the farmers can control their land anywhere and make the best decisions with the useful information obtained from the tools. The goal of smart agriculture is to provide globally applicable principles for agricultural management for food security under the influence of climate change. One of the main features of smart agriculture is to meet three objectives: increasing food security through increased productivity and income, resilience and adaptation to climate change, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. According to the mentioned materials, this research aimed to investigate the factors influencing the adoption of smart agriculture to respond to (in the face of) climate variability among the farmers of Fars province of Iran.
Materials and Methods: This study ws an applied research in terms of purpose and a descriptive-survey research in terms of methodology. The statistical population of the study included 287,863 farmers in Fars province. Morgan table was used to determine the sample size; and based on this table, the sample size was determined 384 people. Also, a simple random sampling method was used to select the sample size. The main tool for collecting research data was a questionnaire. In order to determine the construct validity, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) index was calculated; and to calculate the reliability of the questionnaire, Composite Reliability (CR) test and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used. Frequency distribution tables and central tendency indices including frequency distribution, standard and mean deviations were used to describe the research variables as well as Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach and coefficient of determination, CVCom and CVRed statistics were used to fit the model. SPSS22 and SMART PLS2 software were used to analyze the research data.
Results and Discussion: The results of the structural equation test for the relationship between the studied variables and adoption of smart agriculture for responding to (in the face of) climate variability showed that the significance of individual factors was 10.057, indicating a greater value than the critical limit of 1.96, and the factor loading value in the standard case was estimated 0.962, indicating that the relationship between the two variables was positive and in the direct direction, because the coefficient obtained was positive. For agricultural factors, the significance was 8.846, and the factor loading value in the standard case was calculated 0.883, indicating that the relationship between the two variables was positive and in the direct direction as well. For the social factors, it was equal to 6.693, and the factor loading value in the standard case was equal to 0.680, indicating that the relationship between the two variables was positive and in the direct direction too. Finally, for the economic factors, the significance was 4.916 and the factor loading value in the standard case was obtained as 0.425, indicating that the relationship between the economic factors and the adoption of smart agriculture tin the face of the climate variability was positive and in a direct direction as well, because the obtained coefficient was positive. The study findings showed that there were positive and significant relations of the social, agricultural and individual factors with the adoption of smart agriculture in the face of the climate variability. 
Conclusion and Suggestions: Based on the study results, indicating that there were some positive and significant relations between the studied economic, social, agricultural and individual factors and the adoption of smart agriculture in the face of the climate change (variability), it is suggested that the government take necessary measures to provide the economic and technical infrastructure needed to implement the smart agriculture; also, special and low-interest facilities be considered for farmers who are more inclined to adopt it. In addition, it is suggested that in order to promote the smart agriculture, in addition to focusing on educational and extension programs that can lead to changes in farmers’ attitudes and behaviors, a special attention should be paid to issues such as the cultural and social status of target groups as well as the individual characteristics of farmers, especially young and progressive farmers with higher levels of education.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Smart Agriculture
Climate Variability
Adoption. Fars (Province).
1.      Abbaszadeh, F. (2020). Smart agriculture and its relationship with climate change. Proceedings of Jiroft National Agriculture and Health Conference, Jirof, Iran. [In Persian]
2.      Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3.      Ali, A, & Erenstein, O. (2017). Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan. Climate Risk Management, 16, 183-194.
4.      Amiri, S., & Mirakzadeh, A. (2022). Investigating factors affecting the adoption of smart water meters among farmers in the Mahidasht Plain. Advanced Technologies in Water Productivity, 2(3), 36-53. [In Persian]
5.      Asseldonk, M. V., Girvetz, E., Pamuk, H., Wattel, C., & Ruben, R. (2023). Policy incentives for smallholder adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices. Politics of Technology, 5, 1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2023.1112311.
6.      Bakhshoudehnia, N., Farhadian, H., Akbari, A., & Saadoundi, M. (2023). Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA). The 9th National Conference on Food Security, Ideas and Researches in Recycling Engineering and Reducing Agricultural Waste, Tehran. Available at https://civilica.com/doc/1679365. [In Persian]
7.      Belay, A., Mirzabaev, A., Recha, J. W., Oludhe, C., Osano, P. M., Berhane, Z., Olaka, L. A., Tegegne, Y. T., Demissie, T., Mutsami C., & Solomon D. (2023). Does climate-smart agriculture improve household income and food security? Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 12, 1-28. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03307-9. 
8.      Below, T. B., Mutabazi, K. D., Kirschke, D., Franke, C., Sieber, S., Siebert, R., & Tscherning, K. (2012). Can farmers adaptation to climate change be explained by socio-economic household-level variables? Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 223-235.
9.      Benson, T., Natal, A., Wycliffe, T., & Hegarty, J. Ph. (2023). Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) for Sustainable Agriculture nexus: a tool for transforming food systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology, 1-11(6), 1195-1199. DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.V11i6.1195-1199.5591.
10.  Bose, M, Abdullah, A, Harun, R, Jamalani, M, Elawad, R, & Fallah, M. (2014). Perception of and adaptation to climate change by farmers in the semi-arid zone of north-eastern Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science Toxicology and Food Technology, 1(8), 52-57.
11.  Butler, J. R. A, Skewes, T, Mitchell, D, Pontio, M, & Hills, T. (2014). Stakeholder perceptions of ecosystem service declines in Milne Bay, Papua New Guinea: Is human population a more critical driver than climate change? Marine Policy, 46, 1-13.
12.  Camarotto, C., Dal Ferro, N., Piccoli, I., Polese, R., Furlan, L., Chiarini, F., & Morari, F. (2018). Conservation agriculture and cover crop practices to regulate water, carbon and nitrogen cycles in the low-lying Venetian plain. Catena, 167, 236-249.
13.  Chisanga, K, Bosco Mvula, A, & Habibu, T, (2017). The role of indigenous knowledge in climate adaptation: experiences with farmer perceptions from climate H. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(9), 94-101.
14.  Chou, K. T. (2013). The public perception of climate change in Taiwan and its paradigm shift. Energy Policy, 61, 1252-1260.
15.  Cooper, P. J. M., Dimes, J., Rao, K. P. .C., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B., & Twomlow, S. (2008). Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of Sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 126(1), 24-35.
16.  Deng, J., Sun, P., Zhao, F., Han, X., Yang, G., & Feng, Y. (2016). Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models. Sci. Total Environ., 550, 382-390.
17.  Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., Ringler, C., Alemu, T., & Yesuf, M. (2009). Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Globbal Environ. Change, 19, 248-255.
18.  Etemadi, M, Mousavi, N, & Amini, A. (2021). Evaluation of factors affecting the adoption of smart gricultural solutions to the climate with an emphasis on the characteristics of social and psychological capital. Agricultural Economy Magazine, 16(1), 1-33. [In Persian]
19.  FAO (2010). Climate-smart agriculture: policies, practices, and financing for food security, adaptation and mitigation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
20.  FAO (2015). FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/. Retreived at 03.12. 2015.
21.  Filippini, R., Marescotti, M. E., Demartini, E., & Gaviglio, A. (2020). Social networks as drivers for technology adoption: a study from a rural mountain area in Italy. Sustainability, 12(22), 9392. DOI: 10.3390/su12229392.
22.  Freed, E. K., Schulte, R. P. O., & Loboguerrero, A. M. (2023). How does climate-smart agriculture contribute to global climate policy? Bridging the gap between policy and practice. Front. Sustain. Food System., 7, 802289. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.802289.
23.  Ghambar Ali, R, Papzan, A, & Afsharzadeh, N. (2013). Analysis of farmers’ perceptions of climate change and adaptation strategies. Journal of Rural Research, 3(11), 192-213. [In Persian]
24.  Ghasemlou, N., Mutkan, A., Alimohammadi Sarab, A., Aqiqi, H., & Mirbagheri, B. (2023). Using Internet of Things technology in collecting environmental information of agricultural land using sensor observation service. Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System in Natural Resources, 14(4), 12-19. DOI: 10.30495/girs.2023.691226. [In Persian]
25.  Hesabi, F., Jafarpanah, A., Karshenas, A., & Ahmadzadeh, M. H. (2023). Technological trends in smart agriculture. Entrepreneurship Strategies in Agriculture, 10(2), 102-115. [In Persian]
26.  IPCC (2013). Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker, T. F, Qin, D, Plattner, G. K, Tioner, M, Allen, S. K, Boschung, J, Nauels, A, Xia, Y, Bexm V, Midgley, P. M. (Eds) Climate change 2013: Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York.
27.  Jahangirpour, D.., & Zibaei, M. (2021). Cropping pattern optimization within the framework of climate-smart agriculture objectives: a case study of the Dorudzan irrigation network, Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development (Agricultural Sciences and Industries), 35(4), 407-422. Available at https://sid.ir/paper/1053935/fa. [In Persian]
28.  Jiri, O, Mtali-Chafadza, L, & Mafongoya, P. L. (2017). Influence of smallholder farmers’ perceptions on adaptation strategies to climate change and policy implications in Zimbabwe. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 3(1), 47-55.
29.  Kazem Alilou, V., & Jamshidi, B. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence in climate smart agriculture. Agricultural Information Science and Technology, 5(2), 51-60. DOI: 10.22092/jaist.2023.362065.1090. [In Persian]
30.  Kimeli, P, Nyasimi, M, & Radeny, M. (2017). Strengthening farmer adaptive capacity through farms of the future approach in Nyando, western Kenya. In: Filho, W. L. et al (Eds) Climate change adaptation in africa: fostering resilience and capacity to adapt (Part II, Cham). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 629-645.
31.  Kuvelkar, R., Anjanappa, J., & Bhattacharya, A. (2023). Climate smart agriculture to attain food security based on a global outlook. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=4384125. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.438 4125.
32.  Levidow, L., Zaccaria, D., Maia, R., Vivas, E., Todorovic, M., & Scardigno, A. (2014). Improving water-efficient irrigation: prospects and difficulties of innovative practices. Agricultural Water Managagement, 146, 84-94.
33.  Luo, L., Qin, L., Wang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2016). Environmentally-friendly agricultural practices and their acceptance by smallholder farmers in China: a case study in Xinxiang County, Henan province. Sci. Total Environ., 571, 737-743.
34.  Manandhar, S, Pratoomchai, W, Ono, K, Kazama, S, & Komori, D. (2015). Local people’s perceptions of climate change and related hazards in mountainous areas of northern Thailand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 11, 47-59.
35.  Moosaei, M., & Seyednejad, M. (2021). The impact of information and communication technology on agricultural systems and the transition to food stability and security (case study: Agriculture-Jahad Organization, Khuzestan province). International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems (IJASRT in EESs), 11(1), 41-53.
36.  Nguyen, T. P. L, Seddaiu, G, Virdis, S. G. P, Tidore, C, Pasqui, M, & Roggero, P. P. (2016). Perceiving to learn or learning to perceive? Understanding farmers’ perceptions and adaptation to climate uncertainties. Agricultural Systems, 143, 205-216.
37.  Oduntan, O., & Obisesan, A. (2022). Factors influencing adoption of climate smart agricultural practices among maize farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Allied Research, 7(4), 164-177. Available at https://jearecons.com/index.php/jearecons/article/view/264.
38.  Ogisi, O. D., & Begho, T. (2023). Adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of the progress, barriers, gender differences and recommendations. Farming System, 1(2), [100019].
39.  Pagliacci, F, Defrancesco, E, Mozzato, D, Bortolini, L, Pezzuolo, A, Pirotti, F, Pisani, E, & Gatto, P. (2020). Drivers of farmers’ adoption and continuation of climate-smart agricultural practices: a study from northeastern Italy. Science of the Total Environment, 710, 136345.
40.  Parry, M, Canziani, O, Palutikof, J, Van der Linden, P, & Hanson, C. (2007). Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA.
41.  Reyhani, M., & Manavipour, D. (2020). Standardization and evaluation of psychometric properties of Midchildhood Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAI). Islamic Life Style, 4(3), 123-138. [In Persian]
42.  Roostaei, M., Asadi, A., & Kalantari, Kh. (2021). Examining the interrelationships of smart climate agricultural components using DEMATEL technique. Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 52(3), 569-589. DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2019.260450.66861. [In Persian]
43.  Rosenzweig, C., & Tubiello, F. N. (2007). Adaptation and mitigation strategies in agriculture: an analysis of potential synergies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(5), 855-873.
44.  Sabet, F., & Mohammadpour, M. (2021). Smart agriculture. Extension Journal of Agricultural Information Science and Technology, 4(1), 49-58. [In Persian]
45.  SCI (2018). Agricultural products of Fars province, 2017. Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), Tehran. [In Persian]
46.  Shi, X, An, X, Zhao, Q, Liu, H, Xia, L, Sun, X, & Guo, Y. (2019). State-of-the-art internet of things in protected agriculture. Sensors, 19(8), 1833.
47.  Stavtsev, A. N., Natarov, D. S., & Porfirov, P. A. (2018). European market of organic livestock: modern trends. Economy, Labor, Management in Agriculture, 12, 37-45. DOI: 10.33938/1812-37.
48.  Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., Stern, P., & Weber, E. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A Report by the American Psychological Association’s Task Force on the Interface between Psychology and Global Climate Change. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
49.  Tesfahunegn, G. B., Mekonen, K., & Tekle, A. (2016). Farmers’ perception on causes, indicators and determinants of climate change in northern Ethiopia: implication for developing adaptation strategies. Applied Geography, 73, 1-12.
50.  Tromboni, F., Bortolini, L., & Martello, M. (2014). The use of water in the agricultural sector: a procedure for the assessment of large-scale irrigation efficiency with GIS. Irriggation, Drain., 63, 440-450.
51.  Wood, S. A, Jina, A. S, Jain, M, Kristjanson, P, & DeFries, R. S. (2014). Smallholder farmer cropping decisions related to climate variability across multiple regions. Global Environmental Change, 25, 163-172.
52.  Zhao, J., Liu, D., & Huang, R. (2023). A review of climate-smart agriculture: recent advancements, challenges, and future directions. Sustainability, 15(4), 3404. DOI: 10.3390 /su15043404.