Investigating the Effects of International Trade on Food Security (Case Study: A Selection of Countries with Middle-High-income)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Ardakan, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Hunger, food insecurity and poverty is the most important critical issues in some countries. Of all the rights given to a community's basic household needs, "food security" is one of the most important individual needs that governments are responsible for providing. International trade can reduce food insecurity in countries by facilitating access to larger markets, Hence, food trade could be regarded as the solution to world food security. Thus for global food security, food trade is vital. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between international trade and food security in the group of high-middle income countries including Iran during the period of 2002–2016 using a random-effects panel econometric approach. The results show that there is a U-shaped relationship between the two variables of food security and international trade. It indicates that food security declines in the early stages of trade development and increases beyond a certain threshold. Based on the findings of the study, suggestions have been made to improve the relationship between food security and international trade that need to be considered by policy makers.

Keywords

References

  1. Agenor, P.R. (2004). Does globalization hurt the poor? Journal of International Economics and Economic Policy, 1: 21-51.
  2. An, C.B. and Jeon, S.H. (2006). Demographic change and economic growth: an inverted-U shape relationship. Journal of Economics Letters, 92: 447-454.
  3. Assoumou-Ella, G. (2019). External trade and food security: the case of CEMAC countries. Journal of Food Security, 7(2): 58-62.
  4. Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 1). Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley and Sons.
  5. Biniaz, A. and Mohammadi, H. (2018). The effect of agricultural trade openness on food security in Iran: ARDL approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 10(2): 81-103. (Persian)
  6. Dorosh, P.A. (2001). Trade liberalization and national food security: rice trade between Bangladesh and India. Journal of World Development, 29(4): 673-689.
  7. Diaz-Bonilla, E. and Ron, J.F. (2011). Food security, price volatility and trade: Some reflections for developing countries. ICTSD Issue Paper 27, ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Available at http://ictsd.org/downloads/2011/12/foodsecurity-price-volatility-and-trade.pdf.
  8. Fattahi Ardakani, A. and Fazlollahi Maleh, E. (2015). A comparison of general preferences and willingness to pay of tourists and residents of Sari County for conservation of Caspian Sea. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(1): 135-152. (Persian)
  9. Fattahi Ardakani, A. (2010). Economic valuation of ground water in Yazd Plain. PhD Thesis, Agricultural Economics, University of Tehran. (Persian)
  10. Fattahi Ardakani, A., Rezvani, M., Bostan, Y. and Arab, M. (2016). Estimating public participation in investment in organic products in Babol (case study: Organic rice). The Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Science and Technology, Batumi.
  11. FAO (2012). Food security indicator. Available at http:// www.fao.org/ economic/ ess/ess–fs/ess–fadata /en.
  12. FAO (2017). Percentage prevalence of malnutrition and Average value of food production in countries with different income levels during 2002-2016. Available at http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/2017/en/.
  13. Green, W.H. (2003). Econometric analysis. 5th Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  14. Li, S. (2009). The effect of trade liberalization on Chinese rural poverty. Journal of Asian Social Science, 5: 23-33.
  15. Johnson, D.G. (1998). Food security and world trade prospects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80: 941-947.
  16. Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. and Mousavi Mohammadi, H. (2009). The effect of trade liberalization on food security of rural households in Iran. Journal of Rural and Development, 12(2): 1-13. (Persian)
  17. Mostajeran, F., Zibaei, M. and Farajzadeh, Z. (2018). Trade liberalization consequences with an emphasis on food security in Iran: Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 26(101): 145-180. (Persian)
  18. Kang, H. (2015). A study on the relationship between international trade and food security: evidence from less developed countries (LDCs). Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10: 475-483.
  19. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. Journal of American Economic Review, 45: 1-28.
  20. Nisa, M., Rizwan Yaseen, M. and Quddoos, A. (2017). Food security and international trade: an application of Kuznet curve in the most populous South asiAn countries. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 7(6):119-125.
  21. Souri, A. (2012). Econometrics with application of EVeiws and Stata. (5th, Vol. 2). Tehran: Farhangshenasi Publications. (Persian)
  22. Torras M. and Boyce, J.K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Ecological Economics, 25: 147-160.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics