The Effect of Livelihood Strategies and Capitals on Natural Rangelands and Household Poverty in Fars Province of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Corresponding Author and PhD Graduate in Agricultural Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Professor of Agricultural Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Revenues from traditional ranching activity have declined in recent years. In addition, overgrazing on natural rangelands are known to be one of the main reasons of adverse environmental conditions. Some researchers believe that households will be able to achieve sustainable livelihoods by selecting the correct livelihood strategy and using capitals properly. In this regard, this study was conducted to investigate the impact of livelihood strategies and capitals on rangeland sustainability and reducing household poverty in the northern rangelands of Fars province in Iran. For this purpose, since nomads are the main users of rangelands, a sample of 393 nomadic households was selected to collect the required data. Also, to deal with the unknown heterogeneity, the environmental consequences and poverty of the livelihood strategies adopted by the households were examined in the counterfactual analysis framework using multinomial endogenous switching regression. The study results showed that if should the nomads select the strategy based on diversity of activities, the household poverty index would decrease by five percent and the rangeland sustainability index would increase by four percent. Therefore, by adopting a strategy based on diversity of activities, it is possible to simultaneously reduce household poverty and increase rangeland sustainability. 

Keywords

References

  1. Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M. and Gurgand, M. (2017). Selection bias corrections based on the multinomial logit model: Monte Carlo comparisons. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1): 174-205.
  2. Carter, D.W. and Milon, J.W. (2005). Price knowledge in household for utility services. Land Economics, 81: 265-283.
  3. Chen, J., Yin, S., Gebhardt, H. and Yang, X. (2018). Farmers' livelihood adaptation to environmental change in an arid region: a case of the Minqin Oasis, northwestern China. Ecological Indicators, 93: 411-423.
  4. Danso-Abbeam, G. and Baiyegunhi, L.J.S. (2018). Welfare impact of pesticidies management practices among smallholder cocoa farmers in Ghana. Technology in Society, 52(1): 1-10.
  5. Dehghanipour, M., Barati, A.A., Azadi, H. and Scheffran, J. (2018). Revealing the role of livelihood assets in livelihood strategies: towards enhancing conservation and livelihood development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 94: 336-347.
  6. Di Falco, S., Veronesi, M. and Yesuf, M. (2011). Does adaptation to climate change provide food security? A micro perspective from Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(3): 829-846.
  7. Di Falco, S. and Veronesi, M. (2014). Managing environmental risk in presence of climate change: the role of adaptation in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57: 553-577.
  8. Di Falco, S. and Veronesi, M. (2013). How can African agriculture adapt to climate change? A counterfactual analysis from Ethiopia. Land Economics, 89(4): 743-766.
  9. Freier, K.P., Bruggemann, R., Scheffran, J., Finckh, M. and Schneider, U.A. (2012). Assessing the predictability of future livelihood strategies of pastoralists in semi-arid Morocco under climate change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(2): 371-382.
  10. Ghazali, S. and Zibaei, M. (2018). Households' perception and livelihood vulnerability to climate change: nomads in Fars province. Agricultural Economics, 12(1): 39-58. (Persian)
  11. Heckman, J.J., Tobias, J.L. and Vytlacil, E.J. (2001). Four parameters of interest in the evaluation of social programs. Southern Economic Journal, 68: 210-233.
  12. Jiao, X., Pouliot, M. and Walelign, S.Z. (2017). Livelihood strategies and dynamics in rural Cambodia. World Development, 97: 266-278.
  13. Kassie, M., Teklewold, H., Marenya, P., Jaleta, M. and Erenstein, O. (2015). Production risks and food security under alternative technology choices in Malawi: application of a multinomial endogenous switching regression. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3): 640-695.
  14. Khedri Gharibvand, H., Azadi, H., Teklemariam, D., Houshyar, E., De Maeyer, P. and Witlox, F. (2019). Livelihood alternatives model for sustainable rangeland management: a review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Environment, Development and Sustainability 21: 11-36. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8566466.
  15. Kinuthia, V.N. and Wahome, R.G. (2019). Attitudes on land-use systems and social mindset transformations after group ranch subdivision in Kenya. Land Use Policy, 87: 104004.
  16. Kuyah, S., Sileshi, G.W., Luedeling, E. Akinnifesi, F.K., Whitney, C.W., Bayala, J. and Mafongoya, P.L. (2020). Potential of agroforestry to enhance livelihood security in Africa. In: J.C. Dagar et al. (eds) Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes: Recent Advances and Emerging Challenges (Vol. 1), 135-167, Springer, Singapore. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_4.
  17. Manlosa, A.O., Hanspach, J., Schultner, J., Dorresteijn, I., and Fischer, J. (2019). Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia. Food Security, 11: 167-181.
  18. Markakis, J. (2004). Pastoralism on the margin. London: Minority Rights Group International.
  19. Mazzone, A. (2019). Decentralised energy systems and sustainable livelihoods, what are the links? Evidence from two isolated villages of the Brazilian Amazon. Energy and Buildings, 186: 138-146.
  20. Paul, S., Das, T.K., Pharung, R., Ray, S., Mridha, N., Kalita, N. and Singh, A.K. (2020). Development of an indicator based composite measure to assess livelihood sustainability of shifting cultivation dependent ethnic minorities in the disadvantageous northeastern region of India. Ecological Indicators, 110: 105934.
  21. Peng, W., Zheng, H., Robinson, B., Li, C. and Wang, F. (2017). Household livelihood strategy choices, impact factors, and environmental consequences in Miyun reservoir watershed, China. Sustainability, 9(2): 175. Available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020175.
  22. Porro, R., Lopez-Feldman, A. and Vela-Alvarado, J.W. (2015). Forest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peru: Livelihood strategies, poverty and wealth in an Amazon frontier. Forest Policy and Economics 51: 47-56.
  23. Rockenbauch, T., Sakdaplrak, P. and Sterly, H. (2019). Beyond the local-Exploring the socio-spatial patterns of translocal network capital and its role in household resilience in northeast Thailand. Geoforum, 107: 154-167.
  24. Scheaffer, R.L., Mendenhall-III, W., Lyman-Ott, R. and Gerow, K. (2012). Elementary survey sampling. New York: Duxbury Press.
  25. Shiferaw, B. and Holden, S.T. (1998). Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopia highlands: a case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa. Agricultural Economics, 18(3): 233-247.
  26. Soltani, A., Angelsen, A., Eid, T., Naieni, M.S.N. and Shamekhi, T. (2012). Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran. Ecological Economics, 79: 60-70.
  27. Su, M.M., Wall, G., Wang, Y. and Jin, M. (2019). Livelihood sustainability in a rural tourism destination - Hetu town, Anhui province, China. Tourism Management, 71: 272-281.
  28. Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B. and Keohlin, G. (2013). Cropping systems diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: impact on household income, agro-chemical use and demand for labor. Ecological Economics, 93: 85-93.
  29. Tilahun, M., Maertens, M., Deckers, J., Muys, B. and Mathijs, E. (2016). Impact of membership in Frankincense cooperative firms on rural income and poverty in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 62: 95-108.
  30. Tuyen, T.Q., Lim, S., Cameron, M.P. and Huong, V.V. (2014). Farmland loss and livelihood outcomes: a microeconometric analysis of household surveys in Vietnam. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 19(3): 423-444.
  31. Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, Q., Kush, J., Xu, Y. and Xu, L. (2016). Assessment of sustainable livelihoods of different farmers in hilly red soil erosion areas of southern China. Ecological Indicators, 64: 123-131.
  32. Yang, X., Dong, Q., Zhang, C. (2020). Optimizing the Alpine grazing system to improve carbon management and livelihood for Tibetan herders. In: Shang, Z., Degen, A., Rafiq, M., Squires, V. (eds) Carbon management for promoting local livelihood in the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) Region. Springer, Cham. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20591-1_11.
  33. You, H. and Zhang, X. (2017). Sustainable livelihoods and rural sustainability in China: ecologically secure, economically efficient or socially equitable? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120: 1-13.
  34. Zhang, C. and Fang, Y. (2020). Application of capital-based approach in the measurement of livelihood sustainability: a case study from the Koshi River basin community in Nepal. Ecological Indicators, 116: 106474.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics