اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

ارائه مدل حکمرانی خوب به‏ منظور پایداری کسب‌‏وکارهای کشاورزی در استان تهران: مطالعه موردی بانک کشاورزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
مطالعه حاضر، با هدف طراحی مدل حکمرانی خوب در راستای پایداری کسب‌‏وکارهای کشاورزی، در پی حل این مسئله بود که «حکمرانی خوب چگونه می‌­تواند منجر به پایداری کسب‏‌وکار کشاورزی در بانک کشاورزی ایران شود؟»؛ و از این‏‌رو، از نظر هدف، اکتشافی بود و از نظر روش، با تلفیقی از روش‌­های کیفی و کمی (آمیخته) صورت گرفت. در بخش کیفی تحقیق، ابتدا با بررسی ادبیات نظری، ابعاد حکمرانی خوب در بانک کشاورزی ایران در سال 1402 شناسایی شد و سپس، پانزده نفر از مدیران بانک و جهاد کشاورزی که با رویکرد نمونه­‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند، با بهره­‌گیری از روش دلفی، به ارزیابی عوامل پرداختند که در نهایت، 32 شاخص در قالب شش مؤلفه اصلی شناسایی شدند. همچنین، به‌‏منظور شناسایی ابعاد پایداری کسب‏‌وکار، از روش کتابخانه‌­ای بر اساس بررسی پیشینه و مبانی نظری تحقیق استفاده شد و ابعاد پایداری کسب‏‌وکار در قالب پرسشنامه در سه مؤلفه (اجتماعی، زیست‏‌محیطی و اقتصادی) و نوزده شاخص طراحی شد. در مرحله بعد، به‏‌منظور برقراری ارتباط و توالی بین ابعاد، مؤلفه‌­ها و شاخص­‌ها و ارائه مدل ساختاری، از روش معادلات ساختاری به روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مرتبه سوم در دو نرم‏افزار SPSS23 و Smart PLS3 بهره گرفته شد. در بخش کمی تحقیق نیز برای سنجش مدل تحقیق، پرسشنامه‌­ای طراحی و پس از احراز اعتبار و پایایی آن، در اختیار 330  نفر از گلخانه‏‌داران استان تهران، که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌‏گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شده بودند، قرار گرفت. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که از میان مؤلفه­‌های مؤثر بر پایداری کسب‏‌وکار کشاورزی، کنترل فساد (279/0b=) اثرگذارترین مؤلفه بر پایداری کسب‏‌وکار کشاورزی است؛ پس از آن، مؤلفه‌‏های کیفیت قوانین و مقررات (274/0b=)، حاکمیت قانون (271/0b=)، حق اظهار نظر و پاسخ‏گویی (172/0b=)، اثربخشی دولت (043/0b=) و ثبات سیاسی (022/0b=)، به‌‏ترتیب اولویت، در رتبه‌­های بعدی اهمیت قرار دارند. بدین ترتیب، از نتایج مطالعه می‌­توان در تقویت نظام حقوقی و اجرای قوانین و مقررات مرتبط با کشاورزی سود جست تا از این رهگذر، با نظارت بر تولید، بازاریابی و توزیع محصولات، در جلوگیری از فساد و نیز در راستای پایداری کسب‏‌وکارهای مرتبط با کشاورزی مؤثر افتد..
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Providing a Good Governance Model for Sustainability of Agricultural Businesses: A Case Study of Agriculture Bank of Iran (BKI)

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Mehdi Salarinia 1
Mehrdad Niknami 2
Mohammad Sadegh Sabouri 2
Hamed Rafiee 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ga.C., Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ga.C., Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: In addition to production factors such as water, land, and labor, businesses in agricultural sector need capital as a driving production factor to develop their economic activities. Easy and quick access to financial resources is one of the necessities and prerequisites for the development of business activities in the agricultural sector, because many farmers and activists in the agricultural sector, due to low-income levels and high production costs, are unable to make large and widespread investments, on the one hand, and the private sector is not highly interested in investing in the agricultural sector due to high risk and low returns, on the other hand. In this regard, the Agricultural Bank, as the only specialized bank in the agricultural sector, is responsible for providing financial resources for this sector. In fact, the basic mission of the Agricultural Bank is to provide credit facilities for the development of the agricultural sector and its related activities, to improve the living standards and income of the rural people, and in short, to finance agriculture and related activities and the businesses of this sector. Accordingly, one of the topics that has been paid attention to by researchers over recent years, leading to the improvement of agricultural production and productivity, is the effect of good governance, so that in addition to paying attention to physical and educational investments, there should be considered and improved the infrastructure related to governance in the concerned countries. The goal of governance in the agricultural sector is to emphasize the increase of agricultural, livestock, and industrial production that will meet public needs and bring the country to the stage of self-sufficiency and free it from dependence. In this regard, the importance of agricultural businesses is highlighted. By moving in the direction of good governance, comprehensive institutions are formed and cause the growth of various economic sectors and finally, development. Therefore, this study aimed at presenting a good governance model in line with the sustainability of agricultural businesses in Agriculture Bank of Iran known as BKI which stands for Bank-e-Keshavarzi Iran in Persian.
Materials and Methods: This research was as an applied study, in terms of purpose, and it was a descriptive (non-experimental) one, in terms of data collection method, following a mixed research strategy, after defining the topic and conducting library studies, the dimensions of good governance in BKI were identified in Delphi method; and to identify the dimensions of business sustainability, the library method and the theoretical foundations of the research were used. In the qualitative part of the research, firstly, by reviewing the theoretical literature, the dimensions of good governance in the Agricultural Bank were identified, resulting in selection of 15 managers of BKI and Agriculture-Jahad Organization of Tehran who were selected through a purposeful sampling approach, while the factors were evaluated using the Delphi technique. Finally, 32 indicators were identified in the form of six main components. Also, to identify the dimensions of business sustainability, the library method was used based on the background and theoretical foundations of the research, and the dimensions of business sustainability were designed in the form of a questionnaire in three components (social, environmental and economic) and 19 indicators. In the quantitative part of the research, to measure the research model, a questionnaire was designed and after verifying its validity and reliability, the questionnaire was given to 330 greenhouse owners of Tehran province, who were selected in a simple random sampling method. Then, to establish the relationship and sequence between the dimensions, components and indicators and to provide a structural model, the method of structural equations was used in the third-order confirmatory factor analysis method in SPSS23 and Smart PLS3 software.
Results and Discussion: The analysis of the results showed that among the six components affecting the good governance of the BKI, corruption control was the most effective component with an impact factor (factor load) of 0.279, followed by the component related to the quality of laws and regulations (0.274) in the second, the factors related to the rule of law (0.271) in the third, the component of the right to comment and respond (0.172) in the fourth, the component of government effectiveness (0.043) in the fifth and finally, the political stability factor (0.022) in the sixth places. Based on the study results, the social dimension of agricultural business sustainability with an impact factor (factor load) of 0.901, the economic dimension of agricultural business sustainability (0.891), and the environmental dimension of agricultural business sustainability (0.843) are the most important components of the sustainability of agricultural business. The analysis of the results showed that among the components affecting the sustainability of agricultural business, corruption control was found to be the most effective component (T-value = 17.854 , p < 0.01), followed by the components of the quality of laws and regulations (T-value = 0.274, T-value = 14.433), the rule of law (T-value = 0.271, T-value = 14.075), the right to comment and respond (T-value = 0.172, T-value = 11.301), the government effectiveness (T-value = 2.146, T-value = 0.043) and the political stability (T-value = 0.022 , T-value = 2.080) were in the next ranks of importance in order of priority.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The study results make it clear that executives (agricultural business managers) have an important role in the sustainability of agricultural business, but designing a good governance model is not simply the responsibility of executives, rather, it is affected by many factors and variables. Also, it can be concluded that many issues and problems related to the sustainability of agricultural business are formed during the formulation of policies and programs and are influenced by other factors. Therefore, in order to successfully implement a good governance in the BKI, the other concerned components and indicators might be considered as well.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Good Governance
Agricultural Business Sustainability
Agriculture Bank of Iran (BKI)
Tehran (Province)
  • Abdelaziz, S. A. (2021). The importance of the governance role in achieving stability and sustainability in family business companies through generations. Business and Management Studies, 7(3), 16-24. DOI: 10.11114/bms.v7i3.5300.
  • Aggarwal, A. (2023). Which factors determine good governance? Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=4530095 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4530095.
  • Alarabiat, A., & Ramos, I. (2019). The Delphi method in information systems research (2004‑2017). Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 17(2), 86-99. DOI: 10.34190/JBRM.17.2.04.
  • Anwarudin, O., & Dayat, D. (2019). The effect of farmer participation in agricultural extension on agribusiness sustainability in Bogor, Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(3), 1061-1072. DOI: 10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.1028.
  • Arend, R. J. (2020). Modeling social entrepreneurship: consideration of the reacting forces. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 32(3), 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2020.1718744.
  • Ariabod, A., Moghaddasi, R., Zeraatkish, Y., & Mohammadinejad, A. (2019). Governance and agricultural growth: evidence from selected developing countries. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(1), 73–80. DOI: 10.20885/ejem.vol11.iss1.art7.
  • Badji, A., Benseddik, A., Bensaha, H., Boukhelifa, A., & Hasrane, I. (2022). Design, technology, and management of greenhouse: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133753.
  • Behdani, , Mahmoudzadeh Vashan, M., & Salihnia, M. (2023). The relationship between business sustainability and good governance. The Fifth National Conference and the Second International Conference on New Models of Business Management in Unstable Conditions. 29 August, 2023, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Bennett, N. J., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental governance: a practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conservation Letters, 11(6), e12600. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12600.
  • Drebee, H. A., & Abdul-Razak, N. A. (2020). The impact of corruption on agriculture sector in Iraq: econometrics approach. The Proceedings of IOP Conference, Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 1-9. DOI: 1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019.
  • Dias, C., Gouveia Rodrigues, R., & Ferreira, J. J. (2021). Small agricultural businesses' performance — What is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1898-1912. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2723.
  • Dhaoui, I. (2019). Good governance for sustainable development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(6), 1-9.
  • Efthymiou, L., & Zarifis, A. (2021). Modeling students’ voice for enhanced quality in online management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100464. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100464.
  • Esmaiely, M., Niknami, M., & Badragheh, A. (2016). Effective factors influencing on the implementation of knowledge management in the agricultural bank of Qom province. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 6(2), 205-210. Available at https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ijamad/Article/1037704.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312.
  • Gashi, R., Ahmeti, H. G., & Baliu, E. (2022). Challenges of women entrepreneurs in the developing economy. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(2), 134-142. DOI: 10.22495/cgobrv6i2p13.
  • Gutterman, A. (2023). Sustainability and corporate governance. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4493058.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The Second Edition. Thousand Oaks,
  • Hajimirza, H., & Shakeri Bostanabad, R. (2021). Investigating the effect of good governance quality on agricultural sector growth. Agricultural Economics Research, 12(48), 145-170. [In Persian]
  • Hamsal, M., & Ichsan, M. (2021). Business sustainability in the times of crisis: propositions and framework. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 729, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012049.
  • Humphrey-Murto, S., Wood, T. J., Gonsalves, C., Mascioli, K., & Varpio, L. (2020). The Delphi method. Academic Medicine, 95(1), 168. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002887.
  • Ikenwa, K. O., Sulaimon, A. H. A., & Kuye, O. L. (2017). Transforming the Nigerian agricultural sector into an agribusiness model – the role of government, business, and society. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, 5(1), 71-115. DOI: 10.1515/auseb-2017-0005.
  • Ismayilo, V., Shalbuzov, N., Cabbarli, L., Safarov, A., & Karimova, V. (2022). Government agencies in the field of sustainable agricultural development in various countries. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita,12(2), 165-183. DOI: 10.3280/riss2022-002011.
  • Jansson, J., Nilsson, J., Modig, F., & Hed Vall, G. (2017). Commitment to sustainability in small and medium‐sized enterprises: the influence of strategic orientations and management values. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 69-83. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1901.
  • Karimi, E., & Niknami, M. (2020). Analyzing impacts of farmer field school on the economic, social, production, and knowledge status of greenhouse owners: evidence from Tehran province and its surrounding counties. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 22(1), 27-41.
  • Kiani, F., Peidaei, M. M., & Dorniani, S. (2023). Design a model to explain the role of good governance in facilitating the Iranian business environment with a data mining approach. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 14(2), 247-263. DOI: 10.22075/ijnaa.2022.27317.3556.
  • Li, T., Zhou, D., Razzaq, A., & Wang, Q. (2021). Rethinking the role of grain banks in China’s agriculture. Agriculture, 11(1), 49. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11010049.
  • MAJ (2023). Statistics of agriculture, garden, and greenhouse products. Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ). Information and Information Technology Center of Iran, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Malorgio, G., & Marangon, F. (2021). Agricultural business economics: the challenge of sustainability. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9, 1-4. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-021-00179-3.
  • Maraveas, C., Karavas, C. S., Loukatos, D., Bartzanas, T., Arvanitis, K. G., & Symeonaki, E. (2023). Agricultural greenhouses: resource management technologies and perspectives for zero greenhouse gas emissions. Agriculture, 13(7), 1464. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13071464.
  • Moreda, T. (2020). Review on factors affecting youth participation in agribusiness in Ethiopia. Plant, 8(3), 80-86. DOI: 10.11648/j.plant.20200803.15.
  • Morkūnas, M., Volkov, A., Bilan, Y., & Raišienė, A. G. (2018). The role of government in forming agricultural policy: economic resilience measuring index exploited. Administratie si Management Public, 31, 111-131. DOI: 24818/amp/2018.31-08.
  • Ndukwe, O. J., & Allison, P. (2021). Good governance and ease of doing business in Nigeria: problems and prospects. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research (IJAMSR), 5(1), 88-96.
  • Nguyen, T. P. (2023). Factors affecting the establishment and development of the agri-tourism business model. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(6), 2891-2904. DOI: 10.55248/gengpi.4.623.28912904.
  • Niknami, M., Hatami, F., & Lashgarara, F. (2009). Impacts of agricultural crops insurance on economic situation of damaged wheat farmers in the Qom city. Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 2(3), 107-117. [In Persian]
  • Nosrati Nigjeh, M., Malek-Mohammadi, I., & Farajallah Hosseini, S. J. (2023). Analytic hierarchy process and SWOT analysis of Agricultural Bank [BKI] in promoting innovation and entrepreneurship in agriculture sector. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 25(2), 301-313. DOI: 10.52547/jast.25.2.301.
  • Parada, M. J., Gimeno, A., Samara, G., & Saris, W. (2020). The adoption of governance mechanisms in family businesses: an institutional lens. Journal of Family Business Management, 10(2), 33-47. DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-07-2019-0054.
  • Paygan, V., Yaqoubi, N., & Keikha, A. (2022). Identifying and prioritizing factors affecting good governance and sustainable development. Public Management Research, 15(55), 93-123. DOI: 10.22111/JMR.2022.40358.5640. [In Persian]
  • Raiten, D. J., & Bremer, A. A. (2023). Exploring the intersection of climate/environmental change, food systems, nutrition, and health: a global challenge, opportunity, or both?. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 117(2), 224-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.11.024.
  • Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: a theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36(1), 48-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.003.
  • Ronaghi, M., Kohansal, M., & Ghorbani, M. (2020). Determining the factors of governance in the agricultural sector in Iran by Using the Type-2 Fuzzy AHP mAgricultural Economics Research, 12(47), 253-288. [In Persian]
  • Roopa, D., Prabha, R., & Senthil, G. A. (2021). Revolutionizing the education system with interactive augmented reality for quality education. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 3860-3863. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.294.
  • Safari, K., Ahmadi Gharacheh, A. M., & Danaei, H. (2019). The mediating role of blended learning infrastructures in the relationship between good governance, social capital and general attitude toward business environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 10(4), 65-74. DOI: 10.30476/ijvlms.2019.84320.1005.
  • Świerczyńska, K., Kaczmarek, F., & Kryszak, Ł. (2020). Political stability as a factor affecting growth in agricultural Sub-Saharan African countries. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 63, 160-176. DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2020.3.7.
  • Tatiana, K. (2022). State regulation of ensuring long-term economic sustainability of agricultural enterpriser. Sustainable Development Policy: Eu Countries Experience, 175(1), 1-8.
  • Tavassoti, A., Niknami, M., Farajollah Hosseini, S. J., & Omidi Najafabadi, M. (2021). Modeling farmers' behavior in optimal management of agricultural water consumption based on smart climate agriculture in Pakdasht County: application of planned behavior theory. Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 14(53), 53-70. [In Persian]
  • Ulvenblad, P., Barth, H., Ulvenblad, P. O., Ståhl, J., & Björklund, J. C. (2020). Overcoming barriers in agri-business development: two education programs for entrepreneurs in the Swedish agricultural sector. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 26(5), 443-464. DOI: 1080/1389224X.2020.1748669.
  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly. 33(1), 177-195. DOI: 10.2307/20650284.
  • World Bank (2022). Worldwide governance indicators. Available at https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators.
  • Worrell, J. L., Di Gangi, P. M., & Bush, A. A. (2013). Exploring the use of the Delphi method in accounting information systems research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(3), 193-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2012.03.003.
  • Zahiri, M., Zaianderoodi, M., & Jalaee, S. A. (2021). Investigating the effect of good governance dimensions on the sustainable development index of Iran. Macroeconomic Research Journal, 15(30), 210-231. DOI: 10.22080/IEJM.2021.20090.1809. [In Persian]