اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

تحلیل و مقایسه کارآیی بازار ارقام گیلاس تک‏دانه و خوشه‌ای: مطالعه موردی شهرستان ارومیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
2 نویسنده مسئول و استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
3 استاد گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
از سال‏‌های پیش از انقلاب اسلامی ایران تاکنون، یکی از اهداف مهم برنامه‌های توسعه کشور تولید و صادرات محصولات غیرنفتی بوده است. در این راستا، شناخت محصولات و فعالیت‌های تولیدی دارای مزیت نسبی و شرایط لازم برای نفوذ در بازار جهانی ضروری به‌‏نظر می‌رسد. شهرستان ارومیه، با برخورداری از شرایط اقلیمی و خاک مناسب، دارای توان بالا در تولید و صادرات گیلاس است. با این همه، وضعیت تولیدکنندگان این شهرستان در زمینه نسبت منفعت به هزینه‌ و سهم از قیمت نهایی محصول در بازار مناسب نیست. از این‌‏رو، در مطالعه حاضر، به بررسی کارآیی بازار محصول گیلاس در شهرستان ارومیه پرداخته شد. بدین منظور، ابتدا با استفاده از شاخص‌های منتخب جاذبۀ بازاریابی، تصویری از وضعیت بازار در هر کدام از مسیرهای پیش روی تولیدکننده ارائه شد و در ادامه، با استفاده از شاخص‌های سهم عوامل بازار از قیمت نهایی محصول، حاشیه بازار، ضریب هزینه‌های بازاریابی و نسبت منفعت به هزینه، به بررسی کارآیی بازار محصول گیلاس در شهرستان ارومیه پرداخته شد. نتایج نشان داد که در مجموعه مسیرهای بررسی‌شده، میانگین سهم تولیدکننده از قیمت نهایی محصول گیلاس تک‌دانه و خوشه‌ای، به‌‏ترتیب، 50/55 و 57/33 درصد بوده و بالاترین میزان حاشیه بازار عمده‌فروشی در ارقام گیلاس تک‌دانه و خوشه‌ای مربوط به مسیر تولیدکننده- عمده‌فروش- مصرف‌کننده است؛ همچنین، بالاترین میزان ضریب هزینه‌ بازاریابی در گیلاس تک‌دانه و خوشه‌ای با 28/85 و 31/86 درصد، به‌‏ترتیب، مربوط به مسیر بازاررسانی تولیدکننده_ عمده‌فروش_ صادرکننده و مسیر تولیدکننده_ عمده‌فروش_ خرده‌فروش بوده و بالاترین نسبت منفعت به هزینه گیلاس تک‌دانه با 4/26 مربوط به عمده‌فروش و برای سطوح تولیدکننده، خرده‌فروش و صادرکننده به‌‏طور میانگین، به‌‏ترتیب، برابر با 2/60، 2/81 و 1/97 بوده است. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش حاضر، در مورد گیلاس خوشه‌ای نیز نسبت منفعت به هزینه برای تولید‌کننده، عمده‌فروش و خرده‌فروش، به‏‌ترتیب، برابر با 1/8، 1/8 و 1/74 محاسبه شد. از این‏‌رو، پیشنهاد می‌شود که برای مقابله با کاهش سهم تولیدکنندگان از قیمت نهایی محصول، تمرکز بر بازار صادراتی محصول گیلاس با رویکرد استفاده از تعاونی بازاریابی تولیدکنندگان در کانون توجه قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analysis and Comparison of Market Efficiency of Single-seeded and Clustered Cherry Varieties: A Case Study of Urmia County of Iran

نویسندگان English

Atabak Kazempour Kahriz 1
Hamed Rafiee 2
Seyed Safdar Hosseini 3
1 PhD Student in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: The development of production and export of non-oil products has been considered as one of the major goals of Iran's development programs since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. In this regard, it is necessary to know the country's products and activities that have a comparative advantage and the potential to influence the global market. Nevertheless, despite the great impact of agricultural products in creating employment and income for farmers and the economic growth of countries, the issue of marketing the agricultural products in developing countries, including Iran, is currently one of the important issues that is simply given less attention in the course of the economic development of the agricultural sector. It has been taken and accepted that in the conditions of not identifying the market and ensuring the existence of demand for the goods, production has no meaning and before the production of the desired product, factors such as market efficiency and the agricultural products marketing should be examined and paid due attention. Therefore, examining the price situation of agricultural products at different levels of the market is considered as one of the most important topics in the field of market efficiency and marketing system. Among the agricultural products of the world, cherry is of great importance, so that this product has become one of the most important sources for generating income, commercial exchanges and employment for the residents of about 80 cherry-growing countries around the world.
Materials and Methods: Tucker believes that efficiency has maximum importance in marketing analysis, and profit in the marketing of a manufactured product is directly related to its efficiency. According to him, the ineffective marketing system causes high costs, large losses, destruction of products and unreasonable prices. But, on the other hand, the high efficiency of marketing causes the income of producers to increase by selling at a higher price or the satisfaction of consumers by reducing the purchase price. In this study, to investigate the efficiency of the cherry product market in Urmia County of Iran, first, by using visual marketing attraction indicators, the market situation was revealed and presented in each of the channels facing the producer, followed by using the indicators of the share of market factors in the final price of the product, the market margin, the coefficient of marketing costs and the benefit-cost ratio, the ‘market efficiency’ of the cherry product in Urmia County was analyzed.
Results and Discussion: Examining the share of production factors in the final price of the product in the market showed that, on average, in the total of four analyzed channels, the share of the producer, wholesaler, retailer and exporter in the final price of the product was 50.55, 22.62, 5.79 and 21.04, respectively, while special processing or high marketing cost used to be rarely done by exporters, wholesalers and retailers in the market. Therefore, the producer's low share of the cherry market in Urmia can ultimately lead to a decrease in the motivation to produce this product. In the case of clustered cherry, in the two main investigated channels, the average share of the producer, wholesaler and retailer in the final price of cherries was equal to 57.33, 28.29 and 28.76, respectively, so that the high price share of wholesalers and retailers, despite their low marketing costs, has caused dissatisfaction among the producers of this product. Based on the results obtained, the highest wholesale marketing margin in single-seeded and clustered cherry cultivars was related to the producer-wholesaler-consumer channel. The highest ‘marketing expenditure coefficient’ in single-seeded cherry with 28.85 percent was related to marketing channel 2, and in the case of clustered cherries, marketing channel 1 had the highest marketing expenditure coefficient with 31.86 percent. For single-seeded cherries, the highest benefit-cost ratio with 4.26 was related to the wholesale and for producer, retailer and exporter levels, on average was 2.60, 2.81 and 1.97, respectively. For clustered cherries, the benefit-cost ratio for producer, wholesaler and retailer was calculated to be 1.8, 1.8 and 1.74, respectively.
Conclusions and Suggestions: According to the study results, the producer's economic benefits in single-seeded cherries are more than clustered cherries. Therefore, it is suggested that in the long-term plan, taking into account government incentives such as ease of access to facilities, the worn-out clustered cherry orchards should be transformed into the single-seeded cherry orchards. Also, due to the good yield rate in single-seeded cherry orchards, there would be less concern about the repayment of facilities in this type of cherry. In addition, due to the existence of significant benefits in the export channels of single-seeded cherry products, it is suggested to pave the ground for empowering production cooperatives in the region, so that these cooperatives can form the core of the single-seeded cherry exports, aiming at obtaining more benefits for the producer.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Cherry
Market Efficiency
Market Margin
Benefit-Cost Ratio
Urmia (County)
  1. Agom, I., Etim, C., & Etuk, A. (2012). Analysis of wholesale frozen fish markets in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Economics, 5(2), 61-69.
  2. AJOWAP (2021). Status of cherry exports of West Azerbaijan province. Agriculture-Jahad Organization of West Azarbaijan Province (AJOWAP), Statistics and Information Center, AJOWAP, Urmia. [In Persian]
  3. Amiri, Z., Fattahi, A., & Rafiee, H. (2017). Survey of agricultural products market with emphasis on the share of different factors from market gains (case study: pomegranate market of Yazd province). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 25(97), 119-136. [In Persian]
  4. Amirnejad, H., & Rafiee, H. (2010). Market margin and efficiency analysis of rice in Mazandaran province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(2), 195-204. [In Persian]
  5. Ardestani, M., & Moazeni, S. (2012). Kerman pistachio marketing survey. Journal of Commercial Surveys, 53, 43-54. [In Persian]
  6. Ashrafi, M., Sadrolashrafi, S. M., & Karbasi, A. (2005). Investigation on marketing margins of raisins and grape in Iran. Journal of Trade Studies, 9(35), 213-237. [In Persian]
  7. Aslam, M., Ghafoor, A., Hashmi, A. H., Raza, M. A., & Rasool, S. (2013). Marketing margins analysis of seed cotton in District Khanewal, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Science, 65(2): 224-227.
  8. Babapour, M., Seyed Nourani, S. M, & Ebrahimi, A. A. (2021). Policy analysis the impact of GDP, the ratio of prices and exchange rates in neighboring countries on the development of agricultural exports. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 16, 261-273. Avalable at https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/2379/97.
  9. Balali, H., & Ebrahimi, Y. (2015). Investigation of margin and efficiency of shrimp market in Bushehr province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 7(27), 167-179. [In Persian]
  10. Beykzadeh, S., & Chizari, A. H. (2007). The study of marketing channel and the effective factors on potato marketing margin in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 15(57), 81-103. [In Persian]
  11. Cotterill, R. (2001). Testimony on the impact of the northeast dairy compact channel pricing strategies on the performance of the New England dairy industry. Food Marketing Policy Issue Paper, England.
  12. Dadmand, F., & Naji Azimi, Z. (2018). The application of fuzzy DEA in evaluating the efficiency of wheat production, case study: city of Torbat-e Heydariyeh. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 10(37), 87-110. [In Persian]
  13. Ehsan, A., Soleymanzadeh, Z. S., & Haghighi, M. (2011). Dezful citrus marketing review. Agricultural Economics and Development, 18(72), 23-42. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2011.58784. [In Persian]
  14. Eisapour, S. S., Moghaddasi, R., Piroozian, M., & Ajali, J. (2018). Evaluating technical, allocation and economic efficiency and small-peasant farming systems in the villages of Miyaneh County. Rural Development Strategies, 5(3), 407-424. DOI: 10.22048/rdsj.2019.115991.1703. [In Persian]
  15. FAO (2021). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Available at https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1c38676f-f5f7-47cf-81b3-f4c9794eba8a/content.
  16. Getnet, K., Verbek, W., & Viaene, J. (2005). Modeling spatial price transmission in the grain markets of Ethiopia with an application of ARDL approach to white teff. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 33, 491-502.
  17. Hassanpour, B. (1997). Economic study of fig production and marketing in Fars province. Master's Thesis in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran. [In Persian]
  18. Hayami, Y., Kikuchi, M. & Marciano, E. B. (1999). Middlemen and peasants in rce marketing. In: H. Manir (1996) South Asian economics in the global trading system. The Australian National University, Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 75-82.
  19. Heidari Kamalabadi, R., & Shahnooshi, N. (2012). Examination of chicken meat marketing margin using rational expectations hypothesis. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 4(13), 179-193. [In Persian]
  20. Hosseini, S. S. (2006). Economic models of price analysis and agricultural policies. Tehran University Publications.
  21. Hosseini, S. S., & Doorandish, A. (2006). A model for the transmission of Iranian pistachio price in world market. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(1), 145-153. [In Persian]
  22. Hosseini, S. S., & Nikoukar, A. (2006). Asymmetric price transmission and its impact on marketing margin in Iranian chicken industry. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(1), 1-9. [In Persian]
  23. Hosseini, S, S., & Rafiee, H. (2008). Investigating the behavior of the citrus market in Mazandaran province, a case study of Sari city. Agricultural Economics, 2(4), 73-92. [In Persian]
  24. Hosseini, S.S., Peykani Machiani, Gh. R., Shahbazi, H., & Hosseini, A. (2008). Assessment of red meat marketing margin in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(2), 1-17. [In Persian]
  25. Hussain, M. B., Aslam, M., & Rasool, S. (2013). An estimation of marketing margins in the supply chain of tobacco in District Faisalabad, Pakistan. Academic Research International, 4(6), 402-408.
  26. Kakati, R. P., & Chakraborty, M. B. (2017). Evaluation of traditional marketing channels of agricultural produce: paddy and rice. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 16(2), 54-69. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3210467
  27. Karimifard, S., Abdshahi, A., & Moghaddasi, R. (2011). Study of marketing and export problems of dates in Khuzestan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 3(4), 153-169. [In Persian]
  28. Kazempour, A. (2019). Investigating the structure of the local cherry market in Urmia. Master's Thesis, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian]
  29. Khaledi, M., Shokat Fadaei, M., & Nekoofar, F. (2010). Marketing efficiency of poultry industry in Iran (case study: Karaj). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(4), 448-455. DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v1389i4.8193. [In Persian]
  30. Mahdipour, I., Sadr-Alashrafi, S. M., & Karbasi, A. R. (2005). Study of potato marketing in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(3), 121-131. [In Persian]
  31. Martin, S., & Jagadish, A. (2006). Agricultural marketing and agribusiness supply chain issues in developing economies: the case of fresh produce in Papua New Guinea. Available at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu.
  32. Moghaddasi, R., Asadzadeh, M., & Kazemnejad, M. (2011). The study of tomato marketing margin and it's influencing factors in the Khuzestan province (case study: Dezful and Shoushtar counties). Journal Of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 4(2), 43-54. [In Persian]
  33. Mohaddes Hosseini, S, A., & Mansoorian, Sh. (2020). The factors influencing marketing margin melon in the Taybad of Razavi Khorasan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 12(47), 189-210. [In Persian]
  34. Mohaddes Amini, S. A., & Zare, Sh. (2021). Evaluation of melon cultivation efficiency and economic productivity using data envelopment analysis in Taybad, Razavi Khorasan. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 13(3), 117-133. [In Persian]
  35. Mohammadbeigi, K. F., Daniali, S., & Mohammadbeiki, Y. (2019). Prioritizing factors affecting Iranian non-oil export using group decision making approach based on hierarchical analysis process. Управление (Management in Ecobomy: Problems and Prospects), 7(4), 60-66.
  36. Mohammadi, M. (2015). Investigating the effective factors on producers’s share of citrus market in Mazandaran province. Master's Thesis in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  37. Mohammadi, Y., Rafiee, H., Iravani, H., & Loghmani, N. (2008). Investigation of margin and efficiency of citrus market in Fars province (case study of Jahrom County). Bi-Quarterly Journal of Agriculture, 10(2), 161-172. [In Persian]
  38. Musanejad, M., & Mojaverian, M. (1996). Babol city citrus market survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 4(13), 101-117. [In Persian]
  39. Paquet-Clouston, M., Décary-Hétu, D., & Morselli, C. (2018). Assessing market competition and vendors' size and scope on AlphaBay. International Journal of Drug Policy. 54, 87-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.003.
  40. Pokhrel, D. M., & Thapa, G. B. (2007). Are marketing intermediaries exploiting mountain farmers in Nepal? A study based on market price. Marketing Margin and Income Distribution Analyses, Agricultural Systems, 94, 151-164.
  41. Shajari, Sh. (2002). Study of marketing and export problems of date: a case stady of Jahrom in Fars province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 10(39), 141-168. [In Persian]
  42. Sharafzadeh, S., & Alizadeh, O. (2012). Some medicinal plants cultivated in Iran. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 2(1), 134-137. [In Persian]
  43. Shepherd, G. S., & Futrell, G. A. (1969). Marketing farm product: economic analysis, 5th Iowa State University Press. Iowa, USA.
  44. Shirvanian, S. (2017). Share of marketing agents in final price of agricultural products with an emphasis on exports: a case study of Fars province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 25(2), 131-156. [In Persian]
  45. Shrivastave, R. S., & Randhir, M. (1995). Efficiency of fish marketing at Bhubaneshwar City of Orissa (India): some policy implications. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 18(1), 89-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.202683.
  46. Singh, P. K. Singh, O. P., & Rakesh, N. (2022). Marketing of tomato in Kolar District of Karnataka, India. Annals of Agri-Bio Research, 27(1), 108-111.
  47. Tahmasbi, A., & Moghaddasi, R. (2010). Factors affecting the chicken meat marketing margin in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 17(71), 163-178. [In Persian]
  48. Takur, D. S. (1974). Foodgrain marketing efficiency: a case study of Gujarat. Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29(4), 64-74. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.268099.
  49. Todaro, M. (1985). Economic development in the third world. Translated by Gh. A. Farjadi. Ministry of Planning and Budget, Center for Economic, Social and Publishing Documents, Tehran. [In Persian]
  50. Traub, L. & Jayn, T. (2008). The effects of price deregulation on maize marketing margin in South Africa. Food Policy Journal, 33, 224-236.
  51. Wohlgenant, M. K. (1985). Competitive storage, rational expectations, and short-run food price determination. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 739-748.
  52. Wolter, R. P. (2000). Operational techniques for applied decision analysis under uncertainty. PhD Dissertation, Michigan State University.
  53. Zare, A. (1997). Economic study of grape production and marketing in Fars province. Master's Thesis in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University. [In Persian]