اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

بررسی اثر ردپای بوم‌شناختی و کسری بوم‏‌شناختی بر کیفیت محیط زیست در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری بخش اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد بخش اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
3 دانشیار بخش اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
در تحلیل رابطه میان رشد اقتصادی و کیفیت محیط زیست، بسیاری از مطالعات از متغیرهای مرتبط با کیفیت هوا مانند میزان انتشار آلودگی یا ردپای کربن استفاده کرده‌­اند. در مطالعه حاضر، علاوه بر انتشار دی­‌اکسیدکربن، از روش ارزیابی ردپای بوم‌­شناختی و کسری بوم‌­شناختی نیز به‌­عنوان متغیرهای نشان‌­دهنده کیفیت محیط زیست استفاده شده که در سال‌های اخیر، ردپای بوم‌‏شناختی به‌عنوان شاخصی برای تعیین کیفیت محیط زیست پذیرفته شده است، زیرا این روش ابعاد جامع­‌تر محیط زیست شامل زمین‌های زراعی، چراگاه‌ها، مناطق ماهی­گیری، جنگل‌ها و ردپای کربن را در نظر می‌گیرد. در پژوهش حاضر، با استفاده از روش گروهی پردازش داده‌­ها (GMDH)، مهم‌ترین متغیرهای اثرگذار بر کیفیت محیط زیست انتخاب شدند. از آنجا که در مطالعات مرتبط با رابطه میان کیفیت محیط زیست و رشد اقتصادی، چندین متغیر دیده شده است، می‏‌توان از روش گروهی پردازش داده‌­ها در انتخاب متغیرهای کلیدی تحلیل زیست‏‌محیطی سود جست. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که متغیرهای مصرف انرژی، ارزش‌­افزوده بخش کشاورزی، تولید ناخالص داخلی و آزادی تجارت عوامل تعیین­‌کننده کیفیت محیط زیست به‌‏شمار می‌‏روند. بر اساس این نتایج، فرضیه منحنی زیست‏‌محیطی کوزنتس برای هر سه مدل در بلندمدت تأیید می‏‌شود؛ همچنین، بر حسب ردپای بوم­‌شناختی، با افزایش تولید ناخالص داخلی، شرایط بوم‌­شناختی بهبود می­‌یابد، در حالی که با در نظر گرفتن انتشار آلودگی و کسری بوم­‌شناختی، تولید ناخالص داخلی در مرحله اول منحنی زیست‌‏محیطی کوزنتس قرار دارد. ضریب متغیر آزادی تجارت نیز نشان داد که یک درصد افزایش در میزان تجارت منجر به 0/11 تا 0/24 درصد بهبود در شاخص‌­های منتخب کیفیت محیط زیست می­‌شود. در خصوص انرژی نیز ضرایب به‌­دست­‌آمده نشان داد که با یک درصد افزایش مصرف انرژی، انتشار دی­‌اکسید­کربن 0/28، ردپای بوم­‌شناختی 0/75 و کسری بوم­‌شناختی 0/72 درصد افزایش می­‌یابد. همچنین، مشخص شد که با افزایش سهم ارزش افزوده بخش کشاورزی از تولید ناخالص داخلی به میزان یک درصد، انتشار دی‌­اکسیدکربن، ردپای بوم‌­شناختی و کسری بوم‌­شناختی، به‌‏ترتیب، 0/13، 0/15 و 0/46 درصد افزایش می‌­یابد. با توجه به اثر مطلوب تجارت بر کیفیت محیط زیست، آزادسازی تجاری یمی از پیشنهادهای پژوهش حاضر و پیشنهاد دیگر آن نیز کاهش مصرف انرژی به­‌ویژه از طریق کاهش یارانه حامل‌­های انرژی است..
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Impact of Ecological Footprint and Ecological Deficit on Environmental Quality in Iran

نویسندگان English

Alireza Keshavarz 1
MohammadReza Sepehri 2
zakaria Farajzadeh 3
1 Ph.D. student of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 M.Sc. student of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: The relationship between sustained economic growth and environmental sustainability has posed significant challenges for several decades. This ongoing discourse has led to the formulation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, which posits an inverse U-shaped correlation between economic development and environmental quality. Specifically, it suggests that at lower levels of per capita income, environmental conditions tend to deteriorate, whereas beyond a certain income threshold, improvements in environmental quality are observed. A significant challenge lies in the identification and incorporation of suitable variables for assessing environmental quality. Numerous studies have utilized atmosphere quality indicators, such as air pollution levels and carbon footprints, to explore the relationship between economic growth and environmental quality. Thus, this study employed, in addition to carbon dioxide, the ecological footprint and the ecological deficit as key indicators of environmental quality in Iran. This study aimed at investigating the relationship between specific environmental variables and various influencing factors, including income, in order to assess the validity of the EKC hypothesis. 
Materials and Methods: The literature indicates that various factors contribute to environmental quality. To achieve the most parsimonious specification, the study employed Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) approach. The analysis of the literature indicated that output composition, urbanization, energy consumption, agricultural value added, GDP, and trade openness might serve as potential factors influencing environmental quality. In addition, concerning the stationarity of the variables’ data, the Auto-Regressive Distributed Lags (ARDL) model was utilized, as it was determined that some of the variables’ data exhibited stationarity at their first differenced values.
Results and Discussion: The results obtained from GMDH approach identified energy consumption, agricultural value added, GDP, and trade openness as significant determinants of environmental quality. The study results showed that the GMDH had the ability to accurately forecast environmental quality variables, particularly ecological deficit, with a high degree of precision; in addition, the EKC hypothesis was not validated for any of the specifications in the short term while it was confirmed for all specifications in the long run. Based on the results, it is anticipated that as GDP increases, the ecological footprint will improve; however, regarding carbon dioxide emissions and ecological deficits, the Iranian economy is currently in an ascending phase, which is likely to lead to a deterioration in environmental quality. An increase of one percent in trade openness is associated with a reduction in the ecological footprint ranging from 0.11 to 0.24 percent. Similarly, a one percent rise in energy consumption leads to an increase in carbon dioxide emissions, ecological footprint, and ecological deficit by 0.28, 0.75, and 0.72 percent, respectively. In contrast, a one percent increase in agricultural value-added correlates with increases of 0.13, 0.15, and 0.46 percent in the concerned environmental indicators, respectively.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The variables utilized to assess the environmental quality reveal a contrasting scenario with respect to the state of the environment. While the ecological footprint suggests a positive trend, CO2 emissions exhibit an increasing trajectory. Therefore, a more in-depth analysis of the environmental quality is suggested. It appears that the components of the ecological footprint, aside from carbon dioxide, are indicating more favorable trends. It is recommended that the policy measures focus on reducing energy consumption, promoting the use of renewable energy sources, and enhancing the Iranian economy's integration into international trade.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

CO2
Ecological footprint
Iranian economy
GMDH
  • Abrishami, H., Bourbour, F., & Aghajani, M. A. (2014). Prediction of natural gas price using GMDH type neural network: a case study of USA market. The International Journal of Humanities, 21(3), 1-16. DOR: 1001.1.25382640.2014.21.3.2.0.
  • Abrishami, H., Mehrara, M., Ahrari, M., & Nouri, M. (2010). An investigation of nonlinear GMDH causality between inflation and productivity growth in Iran. Journal of Economics and Modelling, 1(2), 131-160.
  • Acevedo-Ramos, J. A., Valencia, C. F., & Valencia, C. D. (2023). The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Colombia: impact of economic development on greenhouse gas emissions and ecological footprint. Sustainability, 15(4), 3738. DOI: 3390/su15043738.
  • Agboola, M. O., & Bekun, F. V. (2019). Does agricultural value added induce environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from an agrarian country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(27), 27660-27676. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05943-z.
  • Ahmadi, M. H., Ahmadi, M. A., Mehrpooya, M., & Rosen, M. A. (2015). Using GMDH neural networks to model the power and torque of a stirling engine. Sustainability7(2), 2243-2255. DOI: 3390/su7022243.
  • Akadiri, S., Alkawfi, M. M., Uğural, S., & Akadiri, A. C. (2019). Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy: the role of energy, real income and globalization. Science of the Total Environment, 671, 1293-1301. DOI: 1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.448.
  • Al Mamun, M., Sohag, K., Mia, M. A. H., Uddin, G. S., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 1-11.‏ DOI: 1016/j.rser.2014.05.091.
  • Altıntaş, H., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). Is the environmental Kuznets curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecological Indicators, 113, 106187. DOI: 1016/j.ecolind.2020.106187.
  • Amirnejad, H., & Asadpour Kordi, M. (2014). The group examined the relationship between air pollution, GDP, energy intensity and openness in Iran (Applications of Environmental Kuznets hypothesis). Agricultural Economics8(3), 117-132. [In Persian]
  • Ansari, M. A., Haider, S., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Environmental Kuznets curve revisited: an analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106416. DOI: 1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416.
  • Bagheri, S. (2023). Investigating a non-cyclical diagram between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: a case study of Iran. Environment and Interdisciplinary Development, 8(81), 19-29. DOI: 22034/envj.2023.338377.1199. [In Persian]
  • Bagliani, M., Bravo, G., & Dalmazzone, S. (2008). A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 650-661. DOI: 1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.010.
  • Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29387-29396. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4.
  • Dinda, S. (2005). A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 53(3), 403-413. DOI: 1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.007‏.
  • Dogan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 1203-1213. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8.
  • Dogan, E., Ulucak, R., Kocak, E., & Isik, C. (2020). The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Science of the Total Environment, 723, 138063. DOI: 1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063.
  • Duong, N. B., Mayers, E. E., Nguyen, D. N., Dau, T. H., & Duong, H. T. T. (2022). Extended environmental Kuznets curve in Asia-Pacific countries: an empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics and Management, 22(3), 46-61. DOI: 38203/jiem.022.3.0053.
  • Farajzadeh, Z., Zhu, X., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2017). Trade reform in Iran for accession to the World Trade Organization: analysis of welfare and environmental impacts. Economic Modelling, 63, 75-85. DOI: 1016/j.econmod.2017.02.006.
  • Farajzadeh, Z., & Nematollahi, M. A. (2023). Components and predictability of pollutants emission intensity. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 9(2), 241-260. DOI: 22034/gjesm.2023.02.05.
  • Fathi, F., & Ashktorab, N. (2023).The effect of Coronavirus outbreaks on the future of economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in low- and middle-income countries. Agricultural Economics Research, 15, 107-117. DOI: 10.30495/JAE.2023.28470.2272. [In Persian]
  • GFN (2024). Country trends. Footprint Data Foundation, Global Footprint Network (GFN). Available at https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?type=BCpc,EFCpc&cn=5001.
  • Gokmenoglu, K. K., & Taspinar, N. (2018). Testing the agriculture-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 22829-22841.
  • Golkar, E., Ahmadi, M. M., Qaderi, K., & Rahimpour, M. (2019). Prediction of peak velocity of pollutant transport in rivers using Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and intelligent hybrid method of GMDH-HS. Journal of Water and Wastewater,30(1), 64-76. DOI: 10.22093/wwj.2018.83092.2389. [In Persian]
  • Golkhandan, A., & Sahraei, S. (2021). Assessing the impact of internet influence on energy consumption and air pollution in Iran. Environment and Interdisciplinary Development5(70), 17-30. DOI: 22034/envj.2021.181316. [In Persian]
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. DOI: 2307/2118443.
  • Hassan, M. N., Sulaiman, M. N., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2010). Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) for economic evaluation of air pollution. DOI: 2139/ssrn.1557193.
  • Helmi, H. , Bakhtiari, B., & Qaderi, K. (2019). Drought forecasting using Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in different climates. Journal of Climate Research, 35, 1-18. [In persian]
  • Heydari, M., Khadem Alizadeh, A., & Khorsandi, M. (2019). Investigating the effect of economic growth on the consumption of water resources in the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve. Agricultural Economics Research, 45(1), 163-180. [In Persian]
  • Iqbal, S. (2016). Projections of inflation dynamics for Pakistan: GMDH approach. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 3(3), 536-559. DOI: 1453/jepe.v3i3.904.
  • Ivakhnenko, A. G., & Ivakhnenko, G. A. (1995). The review of problems solvable by algorithms of the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH). Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis c/c of Raspoznavaniye Obrazov i Analiz Izobrazhenii, 5, 527-535.
  • Jiang, L., He, S., Zhong, Z., Zhou, H., & He, L. (2019). Revisiting environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide emissions: the role of trade. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 50, 245-257. DOI: 1016/j.strueco.2019.07.004.
  • Kargar Dehbidi, N., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2019). Comparison of the fossil and renewable energies impacts on carbon dioxide emissions in OPEC and Asian countries without oil reserves. Environmental Researches, 10(19), 313-326. [In Persian]
  • Kargar Dehbidi, N., & Esmaeili, A. (2018). Assessing the effects of economic factors on environmental pollution in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 9(36), 85-108. [In Persian]
  • Keshavarz, A., & Farajzadeh, Z. (2024). Climate change and agricultural trade in Iran: a dynamic input-output analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 37(4), 451-468. DOI: 10.22067/jead.2024.85467.1227. [In Persian]
  • Keshavarz, A., Farajzadeh, Z., & Tarazkar, M. H. (2021). Indicators for natural capital: changes and forecasts. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(1), 235-260. [In Persian]
  • Kitzes, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2009). Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators, 9(4), 812-817.‏ DOI: 1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.014.
  • Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., & Pozzer, A. (2015). The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569), 367-371.
  • Lotfalipoor, M. R., Hooshmand, M., Elami, E., & Bostan, Y. (2018). Effects of the industrial sector economic growth on the quality of the environment in Iran (application of ARDL model). Environmental Researches, 8(16), 103-114. DOR: 1001.1.20089597.1396.8.16.14.2. [In Persian]
  • Mahdavian, S. M., Mohammadi, H., Dehbashi, V., & Dehdashti, M. (2022a). Assessing the effects of political and economic freedom on environmental pollution in OIC member countries. Agricultural Economics Research, 14(2), 14-33. DOI: 10.30495/jae.2022.22312.2059. [In Persian]
  • Mahdavian, S. M., Ziaee, S., & Keikha, A. (2022b). Investigating factors affecting environmental pollution in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(4), 17-40. DOI: 10.30495/jae.2021.20349.1970. [In Persian]
  • Mehrara, M., Baharadmehr, N., Ahrari, M., & Mohaghegh, M. (2010). Prediction of oil price volatility using GMDH neural network. Energy Economy Studies, 7(25), 89-112. [In Persian]
  • Mohammadi, H., & Heydarzadeh, S. (2015). The impact of factors affecting environmental pollution with emphasis on trade openness in different countries (case study: CO2 emission). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(3), 113-123. [In Persian]
  • Molaei, M., & Basharat, E. (2015). Investigating Relationship between Gross Domestic Product and Ecological Footprint as an Environmental Degradation Index. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi)50(4), 1017-1033. DOI: 10.22059/jte.2015.56156. [In Persian]
  • Molaei, M., Besharat, E., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Factors affecting the consumption of ecological resources in Iran using economic approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,22(8), 377-388. [In Persian]
  • Molaei, M., Kavoosi Kalashami, M., & Rafiee, H. (2010). Investigation of cointegration relationship between per capita GDP and per capita CO2 emission and existence of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Iran. Environmental Sciences, 8(1), 205-216. [In Persian]
  • Moutinho, V., Madaleno, M., & Elheddad, M. (2020). Determinants of the Environmental Kuznets Curve considering economic activity sector diversification in the OPEC countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122642.‏ DOI: 1016/j.jclepro.2020.122642.
  • Naraghi, N., Moghaddasi, R., & Mohamadinejad, A. (2022). Study of the relationship between environmental pollution and agricultural growth in selected oil and non-oil countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 14(2), 85-100. DOI: 10.30495/jae.2022.19742.1943. [In Persian]
  • Ojaghlou, M., Ugurlu, E., Kadłubek, M., & Thalassinos, E. (2023). Economic activities and management issues for the environment: an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and STIRPAT analysis in Turkey. Resources, 12(5), 57. DOI: 3390/resources12050057.
  • Pablo-Romero, M. D. P., Pozo-Barajas, R., & Molleda-Jimena, G. (2021). Residential energy environmental Kuznets curve extended with non-linear temperature effects: a quantile regression for Andalusian (Spain) municipalities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 48984-48999. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13608-z.
  • Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development.‏  ILO Working Papers992927783402676, International Labour Organization (ILO).
  • Parsasharif, H., Amirnejad, H., & Taslimi, M. (2020). Investigating factors affecting the ecological footprint of selected Asian and European countries. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(2), 155-172. DOR: 1001.1.20086407.1400.13.2.8.9. [In Persian]
  • Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17-29. DOI: 1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0.
  • Raei, H., Maleki, A., & Farajzadeh, Z. (2024). Analysis of energy policy reform in Iran: energy and emission intensity changes. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 1535-1557. DOI: 1016/j.eap.2024.02.023.
  • Rezaei, M. H., Sadeghzadeh, M., Alhuyi Nazari, M., Ahmadi, M. H., & Astaraei, F. R. (2018). Applying GMDH artificial neural network in modeling CO2 emissions in four Nordic countries. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 13(3), 266-271. DOI: 1093/ijlct/cty026.
  • Ridzuan, N. H. A. M., Marwan, N. F., Khalid, N., Ali, M. H., & Tseng, M. L. (2020). Effects of agriculture, renewable energy, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 160, 104879. DOI: 1016/j.resconrec.2020.104879. ‏
  • Shaverdi, M., Fallahi, S., & Bashiri, V. (2012). Prediction of stock price of Iranian petrochemical industry using GMDH-type neural network and genetic algorithm. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 6(7), 319-332.
  • Shin, Y., & Schmidt, P. (1992). The KPSS stationarity test as a unit root test. Economics Letters, 38(4), 387-392. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(92)90023-R.
  • Siddiki, J. U. (2000). Black market exchange rates in India: an empirical analysis. Empirical Economics, 25, 297-313.
  • Tahamipour Zarandi, M., Abedi, S., Safahan, A., & Fathollahi, S. (2021). Investigating the effect of value added of the industrial sector on the CO2 discharge in Iran: Kuznets Curve approach. Strategic Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources6(1), 85-100. DOI: 22047/srjasnr.2021.128796 [In Persian]
  • Taheri, F., Mousavi, S. N., & Farajzadeh, Z. (2013). Analysis of the effect of trade on the spread of pollution among a group of developing countries. Agricultural Economics Research, 14(2), 47-67. [In Persian]
  • Tanizaki, H. (1995). Asymptotically exact confidence intervals of CUSUM and CUSUMSQ tests: a numerical derivation using simulation technique. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 24(4), 1019-1036. DOI: 10.1080/03610919508813291.
  • Tarazkar, M. H., Ghorbanian, E., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2018). The effect of economic growth on environmental sustainability in Iran: application of ecological footprint. Journal of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 2(3), 51-70. DOI: 22054/eenr.2017.9067.
  • Tarazkar, M. H., Kargar Dehbidi, N., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2017). The effect of economic development and urbanization on the spread of pollution in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 38(2), 155-174. [In Persian]
  • Ullah, A., Khan, D., Khan, I., & Zheng, S. (2018). Does agricultural ecosystem cause environmental pollution in Pakistan? Promise and menace. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 13938-13955. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1530-4.
  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1997). Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics, 20(1), 3-24. DOI: 1016/S0921-8009(96)00077-8.
  • Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2010). A review of the ecological footprint indicator: perceptions and methods. Sustainability, 2(6), 1645-1693.‏ DOI: 3390/su2061645.
  • World Bank (2024). Overview: Iran, Islamic Rep. Available at https://data.worldbank.org/country/IR.
  • Xepapadeas, A. (2005). Economic growth and the environment (Chapter 23). In: Handbook of environmental economics, 3, 1219-1271. DOI: 1016/S1574-0099(05)03023-8.‏