اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه

بررسی عوامل تعیین‌کننده حاشیه بازاریابی در صنعت شیر ایران با فرض شرایط غیررقابتی: تحلیل تکانه‌های برون‏زا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی ، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
10.30490/aead.2026.367589.1719
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نظام‏مند اثر تکانه‌های برون‌زا (شامل افزایش قیمت حامل‌های انرژی، همه‌گیری کووید-۱۹ و تغییر در نرخ ارز ترجیحی) بر رفتار حاشیه بازاریابی شیر در ایران و ارزیابی ساختار رقابتی بازار بود. با توجه به وجود شکاف مصرف سرانه شیر در کشور و کافی نبودن مدل‌های تک‌معادله‌ای در تحلیل بازارهای هم‏زمان، در پژوهش حاضر، ضرورت رویکرد نظام‏مند در تحلیل روابط پیچیده عرضه و تقاضا مطرح و بدین منظور، از یک مدل نظام‏مند معادلات هم‏زمان با لحاظ شرایط غیررقابتی و با استفاده از داده‌های فصلی برای دوره زمانی ۱۳۹۴ تا ۱۴۰۱ استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که ساختار بازاریابی شیر فاقد رقابت کامل بوده و قدرت بازاری بنگاه‌های فرآوری بیش از دامداران است. تحلیل کشش‌های حاشیه بازاریابی حاکی از آن بود که افزایش قیمت حامل‌های انرژی اثر مثبت و تغییر نرخ ارز ترجیحی اثر منفی بر شاخص‌های حاشیه بازاریابی دارند، گرچه بر اساس کشش‌های برآوردی، اندازه مقداری این اثرات بسیار محدود و ناچیز است. شایان ذکر است که با توجه به عدم معنی‌داری آماری ضریب همه‌گیری کووید-۱۹ در برآورد ساختاری، کشش مربوط بدین تکانه محاسبه نشد تا اطمینان حاصل شود که تفسیرهای نهایی صرفاً بر پایه پارامترهای آماری استوار است. اثر محدود تکانه‌ها بر حاشیه بازاریابی نشان داد که در این بازار، سیاست‌گذاری باید به‏جای مداخلات قیمتی پیش‌بینی‌نشده، بر شناسایی عوامل بنیادین هزینه‌ای استوار باشد تا از اختلال در نظام عرضه جلوگیری شود. بر اساس یافته‌های مدل، پیشنهاد می‌شود که سیاست‌های توانمندسازی حلقه‌های بالادستی زنجیره از طریق تقویت تعاونی‌های تولیدی برای تعدیل اثر قدرت بازاری صنایع فرآوری در اولویت قرار گیرد. همچنین، با توجه به کشش جانشینی محدود بین نهاده مزرعه و خدمات بازاریابی، ضرورت دارد که سیاست‌گذاری‌ها بر حفظ پایداری تأمین شیر خام و بهینه‌سازی بهره‌وری در شبکه‌های توزیع و پشتیبانی (برای مهار اثر تکانه‌های انرژی) متمرکز شود. علاوه بر این، کاهش تدریجی وابستگی زنجیره به ارز ترجیحی و ایجاد ابزارهای مدیریت مخاطره برای حمایت از تولیدکنندگان در برابر نوسان‌‏های هزینه‌ای پیشنهاد می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Determinants of Marketing Margin in Iran’s Dairy Industry under Non-Competitive Conditions: An Analysis of Exogenous Shocks

نویسندگان English

mohammad rezvani 1
Mahdi pendar 2
1 PhD Graduate in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Marketing margin, defined as the price gap between the end-consumer and the producer, is influenced by shifts in supply and demand functions across various market levels and their respective price elasticities. Consequently, any exogenous shock capable of shifting supply and demand at different stages of the market chain will affect the marketing margin. Over recent years, Iran’s agricultural and food markets have been significantly affected by various shocks, including increased energy prices, changes in the preferential exchange rate and the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the potential recurrence of such disturbances, this study aimed at systematically investigating the impact of exogenous shocks (energy prices, COVID-19, and preferential exchange rate changes) on the behavior of milk marketing margins in Iran and evaluating the market’s competitive structure.
Methods and Materials: This research employed a system of simultaneous equations approach based on the theoretical framework developed by Gardner (1975) and extended by Piggott et al. (2000) to incorporate non-competitive market conditions. The milk supply chain was conceptualized as a two-stage system comprising three interrelated markets: raw milk at the farm level, marketing services, and the final milk product at the retail level. The model consisted of four structural equations: (1) the retail demand function for milk, (2) the farm supply function for raw milk, (3) the marketing services supply function, and (4) the production technology function combining farm input and marketing services. A Translog functional form was selected for the production function to capture substitution possibilities, while log-log forms were employed for the supply and demand equations. Quarterly data spanning the period from spring 2015 to winter 2022 were utilized. Data sources included the Animal Affairs Support Company, the Central Bank of Iran, and the Economic Modeling and Information Management Office. Prior to estimation, the seasonal unit root test (HEGY test) was conducted to examine the stationarity properties of the variables. The system was estimated using both Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) and Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) methods. The 3SLS estimator was selected as the preferred approach due to its higher efficiency in estimating simultaneous equation systems by accounting for cross-equation error correlations, thereby yielding more consistent and precise parameter estimates. The model incorporated dummy variables to capture the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, energy price shocks, and the change in the preferential exchange rate. Market power coefficients were calculated to assess the degree of non-competitiveness at different stages of the marketing chain.
Results and Discussion: The empirical findings revealed several important insights. First, the milk marketing chain in Iran deviates significantly from perfect competition. The market power coefficient for the farm-to-retail stage was estimated at 0.20, while the coefficient for the processing-to-retail stage was substantially higher at 0.75. This indicated that processing firms (dairy companies) possessed considerably greater market power and bargaining power compared to primary producers (dairy farmers), creating a structural imbalance in the distribution of market power along the supply chain. Second, the estimated substitution elasticity between the farm input (raw milk) and marketing services was 0.20, confirming limited technical substitutability between these inputs. This low elasticity implies a rigid technical structure in the short term, making the supply chain vulnerable to farm-level supply shocks. Third, regarding the impact of exogenous shocks, rising energy prices exert a positive effect on the marketing margin. The elasticity of the percentage marketing margin with respect to energy price increases was 0.029. Due to the high energy dependency of transportation and logistics within the dairy industry, this shock leads to an increase in marketing costs, thereby expanding the margin. Conversely, the change in the preferential exchange rate has a negative impact on the marketing margin, with an elasticity of -0.0026 for the percentage margin. As a production cost shock, the removal of the preferential exchange rate sharply drives up farm-level prices; given the limited substitution elasticity, this upward pressure on farm prices outpaces retail price adjustments in the short term, thereby compressing the marketing margin. Importantly, due to the statistical insignificance of the COVID-19 pandemic coefficient in the structural estimation, the corresponding elasticity for this shock was not calculated, ensuring that the final interpretations were restricted to statistically robust parameters. Crucially, the calculated shock elasticities were remarkably small in magnitude, indicating a high degree of margin rigidity. This finding suggests that recent retail price surges are rooted in fundamental cost-push factors rather than opportunistic margin expansion by intermediaries.
Conclusion and Suggestions: Based on the empirical evidence, direct and mandatory price interventions should be avoided, as margin expansion is not the primary driver of market fluctuations. Instead, policy priorities should focus on empowering upstream actors by strengthening dairy cooperatives to mitigate the structural market power imbalance and enhance farmers’ bargaining position. Furthermore, given the highly limited technical substitution between raw milk and marketing services, ensuring a stable and continuous supply of raw milk is critical to prevent processing disruptions and capacity underutilization. Policies should also aim at enhancing efficiency in logistics and distribution networks to control energy shocks, while gradually reducing exchange rate dependencies and establishing financial risk-management tools to safeguard dairy farmers against production cost volatility. Finally, acknowledging data limitations, future research on the same subject could utilize provincial panel data to capture regional dynamics for decentralized policy-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Exogenous Shocks
Marketing Margin
System of Simultaneous Equations
Milk
1.       Ashrafi, M., Sadr Alashrafi, S. M., & Karbasi, A. (2005). Investigation on marketing margin of raising and grape in Iran. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 9(35), 213-237. [In Persian]
2.       BPTs (2025). What are the 9 operating costs of a milk processing plant? Business Plan Templates (BPTs). Available at https://businessplan-templates.com/blogs/running-costs/milk-processing-plant.
3.       Elitzak, H. (1996). Food cost review. Agricultural Economics Report 729. : United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., USA.
4.       Faminow, M. D., & Laubscher, J. M. (1991). Empirical testing of alternative price spread models in the South African maize market. International Association of Agricultural Economists, Agricultural Economic, 6(1), 49-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1991.tb00170.x.Top of Form
5.Bottom of Form 
6.       FAO (2020). Dairy and dairy products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy. Available at  http://www.fao.org.
7.       FAO (2025). Milk and milk products: market summary. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy. Available at https://www.fao.org/3/cd5655en/cd5655en_dairy.pdf.
8.      Gardner, B. (1975). The farm-retail price spread in a competitive food industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), 399-409. DOI: 10.2307/1238402.
9.       Gholami, S., Rezaei Aliabadi, H., Hashemi, S. Y., Gholinia, B., Shojapour, A., Attarmadraki, F., & Alighadri, M. (2020). The families’ attitude and awareness toward consumption of milk and dairy products in Ardabil, Iran. International Journal of Nutrition Sciences, 5(1), 24-32. DOI: 10.30476/ijns.2020.84306.1044.
10. Heidari Kamalabadi, R., & Shahnoushi, N. (2012). Study of broiler marketing margin: application of rational expectations model. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 4(1), 179-193. [In Persian]
11. Hirvonen, K., Minten, B., Mohammed, B., & Tamru, S. (2021). Food prices and marketing margins during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from vegetable value chains in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(3), 407-521. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12626.
12.   Hobbs, J. E. (2020). Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, 171-176.
13.   Holloway, G. J. (1991). The farm-retail price spread in an imperfectly competitive food industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 979-989. DOI: 10.2307/1242425.
14.   Hosseini, S. S., & Shahbazi, H. (2010). A model of Iran’s farm-retail marketing margin for beef. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 12(3), 255-264. DOR: https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.16807073.2010.12.3.5.5.
15.   Karbasi, A. (2008). Marketing of agricultural products. University of Zabol, Iran. [In Persian]
16.   Kohansal, M. R., & Rafiei, H. (2019). An Investigation of factors affecting the marketing margins using spatial regression: a case study of Neyshabour Plain in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 27(2), 133-154. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2019.95471. [In Persian]
17.   Lusk, J., Tonser, G., & Schulz, L. (2021). Beef and pork marketing margins and price spreads during COVID-19. Journal of Applied Economic Perspective and Policy, 43(1), 4-23. DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13101.
18.   Lyon, C. C., & Thompson, G. D. (1993). Alternative marketing margin models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 523-536. 
19.   Mahdipour, I., Sadr Alashrafi, S. M., & Karbasi, A. (2005). Study of potato marketing in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(3), 121-132. [In Persian]
20.   MAJ (2022). Agricultural statistical yearbook (Vol. II), various years. Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), Tehran, Iran.
21.   Malik, Y. S., Ansari, M. I., Gharieb, R., Ghosh, S., Chaudhary, R. K., Hemida, M. G., Torabian, D., Rahmani, F., Ahmadi, H., Hajipour, P., & Salajegheh Tazerji, S. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural, livestock, poultry and fish sectors. Veterinary Medicine International, 5540056, 1-13. 
22. Mohaddes Hossieni, S. A., & Mansourian, N. (2020). The factors influencing marketing margin for melon in Taybad of Razavi Khorasan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 12(3), 189-210. [In Persian]
23.   Mohammadi, H., Karim, M. H., Samare Hashemi Shabjare, K., & Sargazi, A. (2019). The effects of economic shocks on labor market in Iran. Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 7(26), 268-285. [In Persian]
24.   Piggott, R., Griffith, G., & Nightingale, J. (2000). Market power in the Australian food chain: towards a research agenda. RIRDC Project, No. UNE-67A.
25.   Pourghaderi, M., Mohammadi-Nasrabadi, F., Abdollahi, M., Houshiar-Rad, A., Khoshfetrat, M. R., … Farshidi, H. (2023). Optimal and thrifty sustainable food baskets of Iran. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences & Food Technology, 19(1), 1-16. Available at http://nsft.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-3793-en.html. [In Persian]
26.   Rezvani, M., & Pendar, M. (2025a). To examine the effect of price risk, eliminating the preferred currency and the covid-19 pandemic on the marketing margin of mutton. Animal Science Research, 35(1), 53-67. DOI: 10.22034/as.2024.62785.1749. [In Persian]
27.   Rezvani, M., & pendar, M. (2025b). Examining the possibility of substitution between farm inputs and marketing of livestock products. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 33(4), 33-57. [In Persian]
28.   Rezvani, M., Pendar, M., Hosseini, S. S., & Rafiee, H. (2025). Assessment of the effects of Covid-19 pandemic in the analysis of demand for livestock products using switching regression framework. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development, 39(3), 211-224. [In Persian]
29.   Roustaee, R., Eini-Zinab, H., & Mohammadi-Nasrabadi, F. (2021). Policy recommendations to increase milk and dairy consumptions in Iran based on a scoping review. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences & Food Technology, 16(3), 123-141. [In Persian]
30.   Roustaee, R., Eini-Zinab, H., Ghodsi, D., Mehrparvar Hosseini, E., Omidvar, N., Hosseini, H., Hosseini Mousavi S .O., & Rafiee, H. (2024). A 30-year trend of dairy consumption and its determinants among income groups in Iranian households. Front Public Health, 12, 1-13. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1261293.
31.   Shahbazi, H., Kavoosi Kalashami, M., Peykani, G., & Abbasifar, Z. (2009). Investigating price risk’s effect on marketing margin of meet in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(1), 79-87. [In Persian]
32.   Shahiki Tash, M., Sheidaei, Z., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2016). Market power and risk of price uncertainty (a case study of date market). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 30(2), 107-116. [In Persian]
33.   Tahmasebi, A., & Moghadasi, R. (2010). Factors affecting the chicken meat marketing margin in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 18(3), 163-178. [In Persian]