بررسی عوامل مؤثر در کارایی و بهره‌وری تولیدکنندگان پستة شهرستان سیرجان با تأکید بر سرمایة اجتماعی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز تهران شرق و مربی دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز سیرجان

2 دانشیار اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه پیام نور

3 دانشیار دانشگاه پیام نور

4 استاد اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

چکیده

عملکرد محصول پسته در استان کرمان، به‌عنوان قطب اصلی تولید پسته در ایران، نسبت به کشورهای رقیب مانند آمریکا بسیار پایین است. بر همین اساس، در این مطالعه، وضعیت تولیدی تعدادی از کشاورزان پسته­کار شهرستان سیرجان (دارای رتبة دوم تولید در استان کرمان) بررسی شد. اطلاعات لازم به دلیل مسئله سال‏آوری پسته، به‌صورت میانگین سال‌های 1393 و 1394 بوده است. تأکید این مطالعه بر نقش سرمایة اجتماعی به‌عنوان ابزار نرم‌افزاری افزایش کارایی و بهره‌وری است. طبق یافته‌های تحقیق، متوسط کارایی فنی در حضور سرمایة اجتماعی 69/0 اندازه‌گیری شد. به‌علاوه، براساس نتایج الگوی توبیت، متغیرهای تجربه، شرکت در کلاس‌های آموزشی، اندازة باغ، آب، میزان محصول و سرمایة اجتماعی بر کارایی تأثیر معنی‌داری دارند. همچنین برای درک تأثیر سرمایه‏گذاری در سرمایة اجتماعی در بین کشاورزان، شاخص بهره‌وری لوئن برگر بر مبنای تابع مسافت جهت‌دار محاسبه شد که رشد 5/12 درصدی داشته است. طبق نتایج، باید کشاورزان و متولیان بخش کشاورزی برای بهبود وضعیت کشاورزان در ارتقای ابعاد گوناگون سرمایة اجتماعی تلاش کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Social Capital on Efficiency and Productivity of Pistachio Producers in Sirjan County of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • J. Kourakinejad 1
  • A. Mahmoudi 2
  • M. Shokat Fadaei 3
  • H. Mehrabi Boshrabadi 4
1 Student in Agricultural Economics, Payame Noor University, East Tehran, Central Branch, and Instructor of Payame Noor University, Sirjan Branch, Sirjan, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics, Payame Noor University, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Payame Noor University, Iran
4 Professor of Agricultural Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The yield of pistachio production in Kerman province as the main pistachio pole in Iran is very low compared to rival countries such as the United States. In this research, the condition of pistachio production of some farmers in Sirjan County of this province standing in the second place of production in Kerman province was investigated. Because of annual pistachio production issue, the average data of 2014 and 2015 were used. The emphasis of this study is on the role of social capital as a software tool for increasing efficiency and productivity. The findings showed that the average technical efficiency in the presence of social capital was 0.69. In order to understand the effect of investment in social capital among farmers, the productivity index of Luenberger was calculated based on the directional distance function, which was found to be on order of 12.5 percent. According to the results, farmers and authorities in the agricultural sector should take appropriate measures to improve the situation of farmers by promoting the various dimensions of social capital.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technical Efficiency
  • Luenberger Productivity Index
  • Directional Distance Function
  • Sirjan (County)

مراجع

  1. Alibeighi, A., Aliabadi, V. and Gheravandi, SH. (2011). Structural model of social capital components affecting the risk averse of villagers: a case study of Kelsakaran in Canghavar city. Journal Space Economy & Rural Development, 1(1):101-111. (Persian)
  2. Asadpoor, H. (2015). Measuring the technical, allocational and economic efficiency of rapeseed producers in Mazandaran province. Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(93): 111-135. (Persian)
  3. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficienceies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  4. Chambers, R.G. (1996). A new outlook at input, output technical change and productivity measurement. University of Maryland, WP 96-05.
  5. Chambers, R.G. and Pope, R.D. (1996). Aggregate productivity measures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78:1360-1365.
  6. Chambers, R.G., Chung, Y. and Fare, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70:407–419.
  7. Chambers, R. G., & Färe, R. (2008). A calculus for data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30: 169–175.
  8. Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: Willey.
  9. Dashti, GH., Alfi, KH., Ghahramanzadeh, M. and Hayati, B. (2015). Technological changes, scale effects, and productivity growth of total cotton production factors in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(89):185-202. (Persian)
  10. Eftekhari, R., Mahmoodi, S. Ghafari, GH. and Poortaheri, M. (2015). Explaining the spatial pattern of social capital in rural sustainable development case: Khorasan Razavi villages. Journal Space Economy & Rural Development, 4(11):87-107. (Persian)
  11. Esfanjari Kenari, R., Mardani, M. and Shabanzadeh, M. (2016). Investigating the efficiency of industrial units of pullet, combined and chicken breeding in Iran using DEA and SFA methods. Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(95):69-79. (Persian)
  12. Faraji Sabokbar, H., Rezaee, H. and Gholami, A. (2015). Levels of rural settlements with emphasis on social capital components (case study: Tirjurd village - Abarkuh County). Regional Planning (Azad university of Marvdasht), 5(18):101-116. (Persian)
  13. Gharshasbi, A. and Dadashi, S. (2015). Comparison of technical, allocation and economic efficiency of wheat in Iranian agriculture with emphasis on the period of 2000-2008. Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(90): 75-96. (Persian)
  14. Kelman, J. (1998). The foundations of social theory. Translated by M. Saboori Tehran: Nay Publication. (Persian)
  15. Khaligh Khiavi, P. (2012). Analysis of total factor productivity growth of sugar beet production in Iran using Malmquist index. Sugar Beet, 28(1): 95-105. (Persian)
  16. Lansink, A.O., Stefanou, S. and Sreea, T. (2015). Primal and dual dynamic Luenberger productivity indicators. European Journal of Operational Research, 241: 555-563.
  17. Li, H. and Li, M.X. (2011). Collective water management and technical efficiency in rice production: evidence from China. The Journal of Developing Areas, 44(2): 391-405.
  18. Luenberger, D.G. (1995). New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 75: 211-264.
  19. Mohammadi, H. (2011). Comparison of application of random boundary production function methods and envelopment data analysis in the analysis of the efficiency of tomato paste production units. Agricultural Economics and Development, 19(76): 27-50. (Persian)
  20. Naderi Mahdiee, K., Fetross, M. and Esfahani, S.M. (2015). The relationship between dimensions of social capital and efficiency (a case study of Ferdows saffron farmers). Research and Rural Planning, 4(10): 21-34. (Persian)
  21. Nateghpoor, M.J. and Firoozabadi, S.A. (2004). Social capital and factors affecting its formation in Tehran city. Iran Sociology, 6(4): 59-91. (Persian)
  22. Nickche Farahani, H. and Nazari, G.H. (2008). The role of social capital in labor productivity. Tact, 202: 43-47. (Persian)
  23. Piran, P., Mosavi, M.T. and Shiani, M. (2006). Conceptual clutter and conceptualization of social capital (with emphasis on the conditions of Iran. Social Welfare, 6(23): 9-44. (Persian)
  24. Primont, D. and Fare, R. (2001). Luenberger productivity indicators: aggregation across firms. Discussion paper No. 6. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/econ_dp.
  25. Putnam, R. (2001). Democracy and civil traditions. Translated by Mohammad Taghi Dolfrooz. Tehran: Ministry of the Interior Ministry of Political Studies and Research. (Persian)
  26. Putnam, R.D. With Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  27. Raddadi, M. (2008). Social capital and social security. Development Strategy, 16: 186-196. (Persian)
  28. Sadeghi, N. (2011). Investigating the effect of social capital on the total productivity of production factors case study: pistachio producers in Zarand. M.Sc. thesis of agricultural economics. college of agriculture. University of Shahid Bahonar Kerman. (Persian)
  29. Salari Sardari, F., Beyravandzade, M. and Alizadeh, D. (2014). The role of social capital in local sustainable development (case study: urban and rural settlements in Assaluyeh). City Identity, 19: 77-88. (Persian)
  30. Serra, T. and Poli, E. (2015). Shadow prices of social capital in rural India, a nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 240: 892-903.
  31. Shephard, R.W. (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  32. Tahamipoor, M., Salleh, I. and Ne’emati, M. (2013). Measuring and analyzing the growth of total sugar beet productivity factors in Iran. Sugar Beet, 29(1):113-127. (Persian)
  33. Tavakoli, M., Mirzapoor, S. and Shams Pooya, M. (2015). Evaluation of social capital components in rural areas of Khorramabad city. Geography and Development, 13(39): 17-28. (Persian)
  34. Vatanpoor, M., Koochaki, A., Nasiri Mahalati, M. and Ghorbani, M. (2017). Estimating the effect of agricultural research on productivity growth in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 25(98): 193-216. (Persian)
  35. Wang, X., Mcintosh, C.S., Watson, P., Zhang, Z. and Lu, Q. (2013). Technical efficiency in small-scale irrigation cooperative and its determinants from the perspective of social capital heterogeneity: the case of northwestern China. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Annual meeting, August 4-6-2013-Washangton D.C.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار