تدوین و اولویت‌بندی ساختارهای توسعة زنجیرة ارزش مرکبات جنوب کرمان و الزامات پایداری آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی. کرمان. ایران

2 استادیار بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران.

چکیده

در مطالعه حاضر، الگوی مطلوب زنجیره ارزش مرکبات جنوب کرمان با توجه به مؤلفه‌های اقتصادی، اجتماعی- فرهنگی، زیست‌محیطی و ساختاری مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. برای تهیه اطلاعات مورد نیاز، از روش‌ تکمیل پرسشنامه از طریق برگزاری جلسات توجیهی به‌صورت مشارکتی برای خبرگان، متخصصان و کارشناسان مرتبط با تولید و تجارت صنعت مرکبات منطقه (25 نفر) استفاده شد. به‌منظور تجزیه‏ وتحلیل داده‌ها، محاسبه وزن معیارها و دستیابی به بهترین مدل زنجیره ارزش مرکبات، از روش فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‏ مراتبی (AHP) بهره گرفته شد. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که بر اساس مجموع چهار معیار اصلی و 21 زیرمعیار مورد مطالعه، از بین مدل‌های چهارگانه کسب‏ وکار در زنجیره ارزش، مدل «بازارساز» به‌عنوان بهترین مدل با بیشترین وزن نسبی (427/0) حائز رتبه اول و مدل «لایه‌ای» به‌عنوان کم‌اهمیت‌ترین مدل با وزن نسبی 09/0 حائز رتبه چهارم شناخته شد؛ افزون بر این، مدل‌های «یکپارچه» و «ارکستر»، به‌ترتیب، با وزن‌های نسبی 277/0 و 196/0 در رتبه‌های دوم و سوم اهمیت قرار گرفتند. معیارهای یادشده با نرخ ناسازگاری 04/0 برآورد شد که قابل اعتماد بودن قضاوت‌های نخبگان را به اثبات می‌رساند. همچنین، معیار اقتصادی، به‌عنوان مهم‏ترین معیار با وزن 361/0 در انتخاب بهترین مدل زنجیره ارزش مرکبات، نقش اصلی را ایفا کرده و رتبه اول را به‌خود اختصاص داده است؛ معیارهای زیست‌محیطی، ساختاری و فرهنگی نیز به‌ترتیب، با وزن‌های 333/0، 214/0 و 092/0، در رتبه‌های دوم تا چهارم اهمیت قرار گرفتند. از این‌رو، مدل «بازارساز» می‌تواند به‌عنوان بهترین و اولین اولویت مدل توسعه زنجیره ارزش مرکبات جنوب کرمان مورد تأکید برنامه‌ریزان و سیاست‌گذاران قرار گیرد. سرانجام، پیشنهاد می‌شود که تصمیم‌گیران و برنامه‌ریزان کشور، از طریق اعمال سیاست‌های تشویقی و حمایتی در یک دوره کوتاه‌مدت، اقدام به جذب سرمایه‌گذاری داخلی و خارجی کنند تا صنعت مرکبات کشور هرچه سریع‏تر، متناسب با تولید مرکبات کشور، رشد و توسعه یابد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Codification and Prioritization of Development Structure of South Kerman Citrus Fruit Chain and Its Sustainability Requirements

نویسندگان [English]

  • mahdiyeh saei 1
  • Hasan asadpour 2
1 Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO,
2 Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sari. Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Fruit and vegetable marketing system in Iran has been very inefficient and has caused dissatisfaction on both sides of the market, i.e. consumers and producers. Citrus fruits, as the first horticultural product with the production of 5.6 million tons, have accounted for 23 percent of the country's total horticultural production. Iran's share of the global citrus production is 3.7 percent and ranks the seventh in the world, but its share in the global export of citrus fruits is less than 0.25 percent and ranks the 31st in the world. The south region of Kerman has the third place in the country with the cultivated area of about 33 thousand hectares and the production of 587 thousand tons of citrus fruits. If we separate the citrus fruits of this region into their different types, the region ranks the second in orange production and cultivated area after Mazandaran, and the third in lime production and cultivated area in the country after Fars and Hormozgan provinces. Considering the importance of creating a citrus value chain in improving the marketing system and the sustainability of production and export, this research tried to find the best structure of the citrus value chain among the commercial models in the world according to the condition of the region and the economic, socio-cultural, and structural components.
 Materials and Methods: In this research, the method of completing the questionnaire was used to prepare the required information by holding briefing sessions and training workshops for elites and experts related to citrus production and trade in the region. In order to analyze the data, calculate the weight of criteria and sub-criteria and achieve the best citrus value chain model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used. In the first place, four main criteria and 21 related sub-criteria were identified by examining the types of business models in the value chain. After collecting the data through the AHP method, these criteria were prioritized in terms of their importance.
 Results and Discussion: The results from analyzing the matrix of pairwise comparisons of four economic, environmental, structural and socio-cultural criteria as the main criteria in choosing the best citrus value chain model in the south region of Kerman province from the elites' point of view revealed that the economic criterion was the most important criterion with a weight of 0.361 in choosing the best model; in addition, the citrus value chain played the main role and the environmental, structural and socio-cultural criteria were ranked the second, third and fourth in importance, respectively. In another part of this research, the importance of 21 sub-criteria were investigated and prioritized based on their relative weights in choosing the regional citrus value chain model. Among the seven components of the economic criterion, "specialization and mechanization of the production system" and "productivity", among the five components of the socio-cultural criterion, the components of "creating trust in the people" and "investment security", among the three components of the environmental criterion, the components of "preservation of water and soil resources" and "plant health standards" and finally, among the six components of the structural criteria, the components of "supplying energy and water" and "developing product funds" played the main roles as the most important components in the selection of the citrus value chain model in the south region of Kerman province. If all of the studied four criteria and 21 sub-criteria were considered together, among the four business models in the value chain, the "market maker" model would be the best option with the highest relative weight (0.427) and the "layer player" model would be the last one and the least important option with a relative weight of 0.09; in addition, "integrator" and "orchestrator" models were ranked as the second and third with relative weights of 0.297 and 0.186, respectively. The evaluation results from the pairwise comparisons of the mentioned criteria were estimated with an inconsistency rate of 0.04, which proves the compatibility and reliability of the elites' judgments. Therefore, the "market maker" model can be emphasized by planners and policymakers as the best and first priority of the citrus value chain model in the south Kerman province.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Citrus
  • Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  • South Region of Kerman (Province)
  • Value Chain Models
  • Ahi, P., Jaber, M.Y. & Searcy, C. (2016). A comprehensive multidimensional framework for assessing the performance of sustainable supply chains. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(23-24): 10153-10166.
  • Asadpour, H., Hassanpour, B. & Saei, M. (2022). Reviewing and compiling the comprehensive structure of the citrus value chain with an emphasis on export and its sustainability requirements in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Office of Economic Studies of Agricultural Research Projects. [In Persian]
  • Attaie, H., & Fourcadet, O. (2003). Guidelines for value chain analysis in the agri-food sector of transitional and developing economies. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Agricultural Support System Division.
  • Azizi, S. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing factors affecting sustainable supply chain performance. The Second International Conference on Modern Developments in Management, Economics and Accounting, 21 June 2018, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
  • Azizi, J., & Yazdani, S. (2005). Determining the relative advantage of Iran's major horticultural products. Agricultural Economics and Development, 12(46): 41-72. [In Persian]
  • FAO (2014). Developing sustainable food value chains – Guiding principles. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
  • Fathi, M.R., Karimi-Zarchi, M. & Safari-Zarch, M. (2019). A framework for identifying and prioritizing sustainable supply chain performance indicators (case study: Yazd Tire Company). Iranian Rubber Magezine, 23(94): 27-37. [In Persian]
  • Ghasemi, A., Rayatpisheh, M.A., Haddadi, A. & Rayatpisheh, S. (2017). Identifying and prioritizing the factors contributting to sustainability of food supply chain. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(4): 369-382. DOI: 22034/JEST.2017.10738. [In Persian]
  • Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. & Jafarian, A. (2012). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47(5): 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014.
  • Heidari, Sh., Bavarsad, B., Nili Ahmadabadi, M. & Mullah Alizadeh Zavardeh, S. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing supply chain sustainability indicators for perishable products via grounded theory and fuzzy hierarchical analysis approach. Journal of System Management, 7(1): 233-264. DOI: 10.30495/jsm.2021.1919814.1427.
  • S.R., Jafarnejad Chaghooshi, A. & Mehregan, M.R. (2019). Designing a sustainable supply chain model with an emphasis on behavioral factors for foodstuffs in Kermanshah province. Industrial Management Journal, 14(48): 61-73. [In Persian]
  • Hassanpour, B., & Zare, A. (2020). Familiarization with agricultural value chain. Tehran: A Technical Journal of Fars Province Agricultural Extension Coordination Management, Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ). Available at https://agrilib.areeo.ac.ir/book_8878.html. [In Persian]
  • Hatef, H., Daneshvar Kakhki, M., & Sarvari, A.A. (2011). Comparative advantage of export for major horticultural crops in Iran and forecast it. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 25(2): 227-236. DOI: 22067/JEAD2.V1390I2.9714. [In Persian]
  • Hong J., Zhang Y. & Ding, M. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 3508-3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.093.
  • Khatami Firouzabadi, S.M.A., Olfat, L. & Doulabi, S. (2015). Select suppliers on sustainable supply chain using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making techniques (case study: parts manufacturing industry). Journal of Design Engineering, 1(3): 7-38. http://jde.khu.ac.ir/article-1-21-fa.html. [In Persian]
  • MAJ (2017). Agricultural statistics: horticultural products (Vol. 3). Tehran: Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Center. [In Persian]
  • MAJ (2021). Agricultural statistics: horticultural products (Vol. 3). Tehran: Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Center. [In Persian]
  • Nouri Khajavi, D., & Jafari, A. (2021). Determining factors affecting sustainable medical tourism supply chain competitiveness. Journal of Tourism and Development. 10(2): 123-136.
  • Olfat, L., & Mazroe Nasrabadi, E. (2014). Model for measuring the supply chain sustainability, case study: Iranian carpet industry. Journal of Management Sciences in Iran, 9(33): 29-46. [In Persian]
  • Pirozeh, A., Eshraghi Samani, R., Arayesh, M.B. & Vahedi, M. (2022). Extension education methods affecting the conception of Ilam farmers sustainable supply chain of healthy agricultural products. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 14(60): 134-160. DOI: 22092/JAEAR.2022.359020.1901. [In Persian]
  • PBOI (2018). Development of public sector partnership with private and cooperative sector by providing special financial resources to complete the project. Tehran, Iran: Plan and Budget Organization of Iran (PBOI), pp. 486. [In Persian]
  • Porter, M.E. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Qudsipour, H. (2002). Discussions in multi-criteria decision making. First Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir University of Technology. [in Persian]
  • IPRC (2020a). Law of the Sixth Five-Year Plan of Economic, Social and Cultural Development. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center (IPRC). Available at https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/1014547. [In Persian]
  • IPRC (2020b). Law on increasing the productivity of agriculture and natural resources. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center (IPRC). Available at [https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/782387. [In Persian]
  • Saaty, T.L. (1994). Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 74(3): 426-447.
  • Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., & Gholamrezatabar Divkolaei, Z. (2014). Determinants of framework for assessing the sustainability of food supply chains using fuzzy analytic network process (case study: selected meat production companies of Mazandaran). Industrial Management Journal, 6(3): 535-554. DOI: 22059/IMJ.2014.50704. [In Persian]
  • Saeidifar A., & Akhani, Z. (2014). Determining the relative advantage of agricultural and horticultural crops in the provinces of Iran. Economic Magazine (Bimonthly Review of Economic Issues and Policies), 13(11-12): 47-64. http://ejip.ir/article-1-676-fa.html. [In Persian]
  • Schweizer, L. (2005). Concept and evolution of business models. Journal of General Management, 31(2): 37-56.
  • Sharma, Y.K., Yadav, A.K., Mangla, S.K. & Patil, P P. (2018). Ranking the success factors to improve safety and security in sustainable food supply chain management using fuzzy AHP. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(5): 12187-12196. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.196.
  • UNIDO (2009). Agro-value chain analysis and development: the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) approach. A Staff Working Paper, Vienna, Austria, pp. 83.
  • Yakovlevaa, N., Sarkisb, J. & Sloan, Th. (2012). Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: the case of the food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5): 1297-1317. Https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.571926.